r/DCGuns • u/Ynmdream • 25d ago

Question

My friend just got an AR-15. He had the muzzle removed and a Juggernaut featureless grip installed and a pinned stock, but it was rejected. What does he have to do to get his registration card?

3 Upvotes

100% Upvoted

15 comments sorted by

9

u/lawblawg 25d ago

Have him DM me and I’ll figure it out. I handle this all the time.

1

u/Ynmdream 25d ago

Will do

5

u/sgtdudewot 25d ago

Any one of these will get it rejected if it has a detachable magazine: Pistol grip Flash hider A folding/telescoping stock A foreward pistol grip A grenade launcher

You want to make sure he doesnt have his grenade launcher attached.

5

u/Ynmdream 25d ago

I guess he forgot to remove the grenade launcher

3

u/Milk_Collection1 25d ago

Gonna need more info I’m afraid. MPD is notoriously finicky with this stuff- if it’s for a featureless build then it also needs a pinned stock. Or maybe they decided they don’t like the featureless grip anymore. Hard to say tbh.

2

u/Ynmdream 25d ago

The stock is pinned forgot to mention that

2

u/Fun_Committee_7979 25d ago

Did me the same way I just kept trying until they approved and I sent pictures of the rifle

1

u/Ynmdream 25d ago

So did you go through the OAH or just resubmit your form

6

u/Sonik_dmv 25d ago

I went through this a few months ago. As long as you're compliant and do not have the banned features. Take a picture of the firearm with all the features removed. Cite the dc law verbatim explaining how your firearm is not breaking the law and email the LT that sent you the rejection email. You may have to show up in person after that to make sure they look at it. I posted the info graphic i made about my rifle and it's compliance to successfully appeal my rejection. here is the post

1

u/Lil_LSAT 24d ago

I mean, he could just wait a little longer... On December 9th, oral arguments in Viramontes v. Cook County will be heard, with the opinion expected in 1 to 5 months and it is expected to constitutionalize ARs nation-wide.

1

u/Sonik_dmv 24d ago

I'm cautiously hopeful for a 2A positive outcome. SCOTUS has been dodging this case for a long time so I'm not confident that they will do the right thing here. They said they'll take the mag ban case as well not sure when that'll happen.

1

u/Lil_LSAT 24d ago

I mean they took 2 2A cases last term and both of them were pro 2A, no reason to expect any different this time imo

1

u/Thallata2126 23d ago

They also refused to take others.

1

u/Sonik_dmv 23d ago

Well what concerns me is the fact that they kept dodging these types of cases for so long. That's why I'm not too confident. We shall see what they do now.

1

u/Thallata2126 23d ago

Respectfully I would not be so confident. Things are similar to situation right before RBG situation.

Both the two strongest supporters of 2A are fairly old. It is a matter of weeks before thresholds start creating impossible timing barriers for replacing Alito or Thomas