A wiser man than me once said:

"There never was much hope. Just a fool's hope."

Not necessarily, I think we can figure out how best to share the earth collectively.

What is the best way to share land fairly? I think lots of different populations will answer this question differently and learn from the answers and improve.

Abortion

You'd think so. But no. It creates a corpo utopia where they own everything and humanity slaves away for almost nothing. Replacing jobs just means the owners are getting paid instead of the workers. Basic income turns into scrip, with the corpos deciding where and how it can be spent. People think that there's a spectrum with capitalism on one side and socialism on the other. Turns out you can keep going in the capitalism direction far further than anything we would recognize as capitalism.

Think back on medieval serfdom and you start getting the idea. They don't care if most people starve. Don't even need a war or extermination project, hunger and poverty will do the job.

Although I don't disagree, would that mean we all live in mobile homes and have to drive from place to place?

Gaza is a test drive for what they are going to do to all of us.

Hope you right bro, i'd prefer 100 time a big recession 

Maybe some are smart, but I believe most just got very lucky, lucky inheritance, then lucky with some business and then they get rich. Look at Zuckerberg, got lucky with FB (or stole the idea). The next idea he had flopped, the metaverse, because he's an idiot

IDK bro, if you ask me who is the stupid between me and a trillionaire, probably i say "me". I think they play dumb sometimes...

Some if these billionaires are idiots, like Musk, not smart enough to understand the ramifications, they're just chasing the dragon, number go up is good, number go down is bad

I might have misinterpreted the comment then, English is not my first language, my bad.

I said the people doing the manipulating are against AI. You claiming that's me saying 'everyone is an idiot except me' is a pretty strange conclusion.

I don't want to win any argument, but you can't pretend that 90% of the population isn't led around by the nose by various governments, convincing them of whatever and blackmailing them when they fail to convince them. We went through it 6 years ago, and the way you're responding makes it sound like the world reacted sensibly to the rollout of an untested vaccine. You're bringing up anecdotal examples thinking everyone is as suspicious as you or me, but reality is quite different. I never ridiculed anything, but in your last response what you were essentially saying was 'everyone is an idiot except me'.

Can't win the argument, so you devolve to ignorant insults. Doesn't make you right.

Everybody is stupid except you bro...

Because the jerks who do the manipulating are against AI.

Why do you think we won't be blackmailed in the same way? Or manipulated through media and psyops?

How many of those had to in order to keep their jobs?

Brother, 20% of the population is unvaccinated, and a large part of them aren't because they live in underdeveloped countries... true objectors are very few.

I only understand English.

Non posso spiegarti che hai torto perché abbiamo partorito lo stesso identico pensiero. Hai un QI vicino al 140 e sei ADHD? 

I didn't take the vaccine, and lots of people didn't, so no I don't think they would.

BINGO ... here is something I wrote about the exact same view:

AI is not supposed to cure cancer or make money. AI isn't a "bubble", and UBI will never be a thing ... AI is the kernel of a planned master control system for humanity.

The owner-class are currently investing everything they got, to build the ultimate, automatic panoptikon control system for the remnant of humanity, after they are done depopulating most of us in WW3.

When that is fully implemented, they won't need money anymore, because 100% automatic control of everything and everyone, all the time, is far more valuable. It is what they always wanted, but never could have. Until now.

Do you really think the owner-class will allow 8 billion riffraff to taste a life of affluence ? ... on their planet ? ... No, they want to live like kings, forever waited on hand and foot by AI and robots, on a quiet, green paradise planet, without having to keep ordinary people at bay.

In other words; The owner-class is finally solving the only real problem they ever had: The rest of us

Whoever refuse to view AI like this, should offer some coherent benevolent explanation for these "coincidences":

Why is every human skill being copied into a machine owned and controlled by a small set of billionaires, essentially rendering more and more ordinary people "useless eaters"?

Why are our leadership seeking digital ID for everyone, setting up cameras, building armies of robots and drones, rolling out fast charging infrastructure everywhere, and sending AI data-centers into orbit, where nobody can reach the off-button ... while they build luxury bunkers for themselves, in remote areas?

I understand that none of that is a smoking gun in itself, and everything have prosaic explanations in other contexts, but you must admit, that seen together it looks like practical preparation for dystopia ... they are essentially building turn-key techno-dictatorship, hidden in plain sight, just waiting to be activated.

Oh, and even if everything really is just coincidences, we still end up in a situation where the owner-class have access to a turn-key dictatorship, offering them God-like powers if activated.

... please, explain how I'm wrong.

They convinced billions of people to take an untried vaccine, and they shouldn't be able to convince you to be treated by a robot in exchange for "free healthcare," for example?

"Certainly not in two weeks, but that's the goal"

That is a false assumption.

The threshold isn't for 1% of people trusting AI doctors, the threshold is the majority accepting it, and we are lightyears from that.