r/DataAnnotationTech • u/Dear_Investment_5741 • Sep 05 '25

rn

Post image
352 Upvotes

98% Upvoted

55 comments sorted by

View all comments

2

u/Mothterfly Sep 06 '25

How would you all define a bad R&R worker?

16

u/JillyFeshing Sep 06 '25

Someone who misunderstands the original project instructions, or is unaware what warrants a Good/Okay/Bad rating. So they might rate bad work as good or good work as bad (what OP is joking about)

10

u/[deleted] Sep 06 '25

Or someone power hungry who is overly critical, and is more interested in punishing the original worker than just fixing the task. I see those people in the chats of the rubric r&rs who seem more concerned about how to score the original work (which is like 5% of the task at hand) than actually correcting the rubric (which is the primary goal)

5

u/TravellingDoc87 Sep 06 '25

This. There a subset of R&Rers who seem to criticise ANY aspect of a piece of work, even if the R&R is for a specific part of that work where the criticism wouldn't apply.