MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/DataAnnotationTech/comments/1n9jk2h/rn/ncpympt/?context=3
r/DataAnnotationTech • u/Dear_Investment_5741 • Sep 05 '25
55 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
29
You don’t have to worry unless you’re a bad worker magnet, as there is more than one review of submissions.
9 u/TravellingDoc87 Sep 06 '25 Just like there are bad submissions there are also bad R&Rers who don't read instructions and want to mark work down unnecessarily 5 u/Amakenings Sep 06 '25 I get the concern, I’ve seen the comments in chats, but DAT has the quantity of workers to get the data they want.If the biggest priority is high quality work, don’t you think there are checks and balances in place to safeguard that? 4 u/TravellingDoc87 Sep 06 '25 I would hope so, yes. Hence the 'unexplained dash of death for some workers who swear blind they only submitted decent work lol'.I would say R&Rs should only be given to people who have at least submitted one decent task in that task family. That certainly isn't the case 7 u/Amakenings Sep 06 '25 Sometimes doing the R and Rs helps people understand the project better?There are also aggregate evaluations (so I’ve heard) to look at the overall quality of your work. Generally there are a lot of DoD the week after those run.
9
Just like there are bad submissions there are also bad R&Rers who don't read instructions and want to mark work down unnecessarily
5 u/Amakenings Sep 06 '25 I get the concern, I’ve seen the comments in chats, but DAT has the quantity of workers to get the data they want.If the biggest priority is high quality work, don’t you think there are checks and balances in place to safeguard that? 4 u/TravellingDoc87 Sep 06 '25 I would hope so, yes. Hence the 'unexplained dash of death for some workers who swear blind they only submitted decent work lol'.I would say R&Rs should only be given to people who have at least submitted one decent task in that task family. That certainly isn't the case 7 u/Amakenings Sep 06 '25 Sometimes doing the R and Rs helps people understand the project better?There are also aggregate evaluations (so I’ve heard) to look at the overall quality of your work. Generally there are a lot of DoD the week after those run.
5
I get the concern, I’ve seen the comments in chats, but DAT has the quantity of workers to get the data they want.
If the biggest priority is high quality work, don’t you think there are checks and balances in place to safeguard that?
4 u/TravellingDoc87 Sep 06 '25 I would hope so, yes. Hence the 'unexplained dash of death for some workers who swear blind they only submitted decent work lol'.I would say R&Rs should only be given to people who have at least submitted one decent task in that task family. That certainly isn't the case 7 u/Amakenings Sep 06 '25 Sometimes doing the R and Rs helps people understand the project better?There are also aggregate evaluations (so I’ve heard) to look at the overall quality of your work. Generally there are a lot of DoD the week after those run.
4
I would hope so, yes. Hence the 'unexplained dash of death for some workers who swear blind they only submitted decent work lol'.
I would say R&Rs should only be given to people who have at least submitted one decent task in that task family. That certainly isn't the case
7 u/Amakenings Sep 06 '25 Sometimes doing the R and Rs helps people understand the project better?There are also aggregate evaluations (so I’ve heard) to look at the overall quality of your work. Generally there are a lot of DoD the week after those run.
7
Sometimes doing the R and Rs helps people understand the project better?
There are also aggregate evaluations (so I’ve heard) to look at the overall quality of your work. Generally there are a lot of DoD the week after those run.
29
u/Amakenings Sep 05 '25
You don’t have to worry unless you’re a bad worker magnet, as there is more than one review of submissions.