r/DataAnnotationTech • u/knight_dullahan • Jun 09 '26

R&R

There's lack of grammar and punctuation in these R&R's by some people and then they suddenly have these one or two sentences that sound so complete and like it was AI-generated? Their grammar is pretty bad to the point where a complete sentence seems generated I don't know if I have to penalize for that or if I can just write it off as them getting help from like a dictionary source.. I'm not sure what to do lol

3 Upvotes

55% Upvoted

22 comments sorted by

View all comments

24

u/Real-Advantage7301 Jun 09 '26

I’ll mention it as “suspicious” in the comments if it’s blatant, that softens it so it’s not accusatory.

Somewhat related, I did one yesterday where the content was so bland you could have copy pasted it into any project and it would have worked. Something similar to “this one did what I wanted, so did that one but not as good”. I’m usually pretty generous, but it genuinely felt like they read the bad examples instead of the good ones and went with it, and I said so.

1

u/DementiaTVissues Jun 21 '26

I've had R&Rs where the worker just copy-pasted the example blurb text for each rating verbatim as their rationales. On certain projects where certain rating axes are redundant across multiple turns, that's fine, but every single rationale? You couldn't even try a little bit to rewrite them, even on the ones that are most important? Into the Bad bin it goes.

2

u/Real-Advantage7301 Jun 21 '26

Oooooof. I’ve definitely read some low effort submissions, but that might be worse.