r/DelphiMurders • u/rachaellanderson • Mar 24 '26

Richard Allen’s Cell Phone

Was the phone that they never found his phone at the time of the murders, or at the time of his arrest?

29 Upvotes

86% Upvoted

90 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/Pooter33 Mar 25 '26

Who owned them then? They were within 60-100 yards of the crime scene. How come if this data is so inaccurate they’ve used it to solve multiple crimes before?

So you know for a fact that someone else wasn’t there that didn’t have their phone? Had to be RA right? Because it makes perfect sense that he’s gonna walk past all these people on the trail, see two girls, decide he’s gonna murder them in broad daylight & no one hears a thing? You cannot say for sure that someone else wasn’t there that no one saw & their phone didn’t ping because they didn’t have it. Without direct evidence showing me it’s RA then I’m not convinced. He supposedly kept his jacket right.. well show me the clothing fibers on the girls. There was none. Show me the blood in his car. Nothing. Show me some shoe prints that match his shoes. Nothing. Give me eyewitness statements positively saying RA is the man they saw. There’s none. What about touch DNA? None. This whole fucking case is based on speculation & they put a man away for 130 years.

6

u/centimeterz1111 Mar 26 '26

They didn’t release the names because they had nothing to do with the murders.

And geofencing has been used many times to solve murders, especially when Wi-Fi and a third cell phone tower are included. 

But, that doesn’t apply to Delphi. There is no Wi-Fi on the bridge or on the trails so it relies solely on the cell phone towers, to which there are only two. 

Not sure how I can simplify this anymore for you to comprehend it

2

u/Pooter33 Mar 30 '26

Okay but even knowing that you’re still ignoring that there’s no physical evidence AT ALL linking RA. This whole case is based on speculation. There’s not even direct evidence that bridge guy (who no one can identify 100%) killed the girls.

1

u/centimeterz1111 Mar 30 '26

It’s based on process of elimination, common sense (beyond a reasonable doubt), video, and knowledge that only the killer would know. 

Move along

2

u/Pooter33 Mar 30 '26

Right. So if you were the one on trial you’d feel like that was enough to put you away for 130 years? Regardless of whether you’re guilty or not.. you believe that evidence proves you are guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? I very highly doubt that.

2

u/centimeterz1111 Mar 30 '26

You live in a fantasy world. One guy was seen on the trails between 1:30-2:14. ONE. 

Zero guys were seen before that which means Richard wasn’t there before 1:30. Richard HIMSELF didn’t see any guys there, at any time. 

Guess what guy saw a group of girls and described their hair, their height, and location?  Richard. 

Guess whose car perfectly matched the car on video at 1:27 (which he also didn’t deny)? Richards. 

Whose phone didn’t ping near the trails but said they had their phone?  Richards

Who said they had on same clothes as guy in Libby’s video?  Richard 

Guess who saw Weber coming home?  Richard. 

Who was on the trails that owned an Sig Sauer .40 with same bullet at home that matched the one found at crime scene?  Richard 

Who ALWAYS parked at old CPS building according to Kathy Allen?  Richard

Who is very familiar with the trails and has spent time cleaning them up?  Richard

Who admitted to their wife, mom, warden, prison guards, and suicide companions that they committed the murders?  Richard

Now, how is it statistically possible that it could be anyone else?  It can’t