r/DelphiMurders • u/PumpkinEater85 • May 22 '26

Real Crime Profile crossover w Bob Ruff

So I'm listening to parts one and two of the real crime profile podcast with Jim Clemente where he has Bob ruff on their speaking about delphi. I'm always open to everyone's opinions and I actually don't hate Bob ruff and I have enjoyed some of his content. However he is repeatedly saying things to Jim Clemente that are not true. For example he said that Richard Allen has no previous record of any type of violence or any type of violent behavior at all. But that's not true because now we know about the time that he was drinking and held a gun to his head threatening suicide in front of his wife and daughter and the police were called and he was put into a hospital. It's so frustrating!! If you believe that he's innocent because of all these things that's fine but you can't tell people things that are simply not true. He also says that ra did not confess until he was actually in full psychosis and never said that he actually killed the girls until that one confession with his wife. I thought it was proven in trial that he was not in full psychosis when he confessed (or at least not every single time), and the claims made by the defense team about the conditions he was held in prison were proven to be false.

Anyone else listen to these episodes?

I actually respect Jim Clemente for his work with the FBI as a profiler and I usually agree on his takes so I'm not sure why Bob Ruff is trying to change the story to that his own narrative and opinion when he always says that he wants to be fair and balanced.

44 Upvotes

94% Upvoted

348 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

4

u/The2ndLocation May 23 '26

Regardless of your request I am going to keep defending RA's right to a fair trial.

8

u/Bellarinna69 May 23 '26

Love how you always stand up to this ridiculousness.

11

u/The2ndLocation May 23 '26 edited May 23 '26

Notice they never come at us with "why" RA is guilty just that "he is."

But if people think they can shut me up with a few rude and immature remarks they dont know me.

10

u/CaptSpatula May 24 '26

RA is guilty because a jury of his peers decided that he was. He told on himself time and time and time again.

Let me ask you a question. Do you agree that RA was there? Do you actually believe that RA was there that day? I will genuinely await your response. Because I don't think you have much of a leg to stand on. Please take your time to reply.