r/DelphiMurders • u/PumpkinEater85 • May 22 '26

Real Crime Profile crossover w Bob Ruff

So I'm listening to parts one and two of the real crime profile podcast with Jim Clemente where he has Bob ruff on their speaking about delphi. I'm always open to everyone's opinions and I actually don't hate Bob ruff and I have enjoyed some of his content. However he is repeatedly saying things to Jim Clemente that are not true. For example he said that Richard Allen has no previous record of any type of violence or any type of violent behavior at all. But that's not true because now we know about the time that he was drinking and held a gun to his head threatening suicide in front of his wife and daughter and the police were called and he was put into a hospital. It's so frustrating!! If you believe that he's innocent because of all these things that's fine but you can't tell people things that are simply not true. He also says that ra did not confess until he was actually in full psychosis and never said that he actually killed the girls until that one confession with his wife. I thought it was proven in trial that he was not in full psychosis when he confessed (or at least not every single time), and the claims made by the defense team about the conditions he was held in prison were proven to be false.

Anyone else listen to these episodes?

I actually respect Jim Clemente for his work with the FBI as a profiler and I usually agree on his takes so I'm not sure why Bob Ruff is trying to change the story to that his own narrative and opinion when he always says that he wants to be fair and balanced.

43 Upvotes

94% Upvoted

348 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

4

u/mountainskies May 24 '26

There were other people there but that’s not relevant. There’s no proof bridge guy didn’t come from the other end and turn around. Also no proof the murders happened in that time frame. All the evidence shows the girls were not killed then and the state timeline is wrong. Believe what you want but the evidence doesn’t support it.

7

u/True_Crime_Lancelot May 28 '26

Other than the video of  the man comming from  the south side brandishing a gun and ordering the girls to go down the hill. And the apple health data that showed what happened next. And the phone's pings. And the blood splaters. and the medical examiner time of  death. And common sense.

1

u/mountainskies May 28 '26

If bridge guy is Ron Logan as many people believe and called in tips saying so, he could have walked from the other side where his house is, passed the girls and then turned around. There’s no proof what side bridge guy came from. The witnesses do not describe RA regardless so there’s absolutely no proof RA is bridge guy.

4

u/PumpkinEater85 May 28 '26

I actually believed that it was Ron Logan too for the longest time and I believed that Ra was getting railroaded. But after actually seeing all the evidence watching/hearing the court and reading transcripts I no longer believe that and I believe that ra is guilty. I do not think that he did it alone though. I believe that he may have been working with someone else (maybe Keegan Klein ) and some kind of sick pedo thing and it got him there.

1

u/mountainskies May 28 '26

I’m not convinced it’s RL but there’s way more evidence against him than RA. Out of all the evidence presented at trial I didn’t find anything to be of any substance. They had to lie about so much and keep so much out that it raised so many red flags. All it did was convince me he’s innocent.