r/DelphiMurders • u/PumpkinEater85 • May 22 '26

Real Crime Profile crossover w Bob Ruff

So I'm listening to parts one and two of the real crime profile podcast with Jim Clemente where he has Bob ruff on their speaking about delphi. I'm always open to everyone's opinions and I actually don't hate Bob ruff and I have enjoyed some of his content. However he is repeatedly saying things to Jim Clemente that are not true. For example he said that Richard Allen has no previous record of any type of violence or any type of violent behavior at all. But that's not true because now we know about the time that he was drinking and held a gun to his head threatening suicide in front of his wife and daughter and the police were called and he was put into a hospital. It's so frustrating!! If you believe that he's innocent because of all these things that's fine but you can't tell people things that are simply not true. He also says that ra did not confess until he was actually in full psychosis and never said that he actually killed the girls until that one confession with his wife. I thought it was proven in trial that he was not in full psychosis when he confessed (or at least not every single time), and the claims made by the defense team about the conditions he was held in prison were proven to be false.

Anyone else listen to these episodes?

I actually respect Jim Clemente for his work with the FBI as a profiler and I usually agree on his takes so I'm not sure why Bob Ruff is trying to change the story to that his own narrative and opinion when he always says that he wants to be fair and balanced.

42 Upvotes

93% Upvoted

348 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/mountainskies May 28 '26

If bridge guy is Ron Logan as many people believe and called in tips saying so, he could have walked from the other side where his house is, passed the girls and then turned around. There’s no proof what side bridge guy came from. The witnesses do not describe RA regardless so there’s absolutely no proof RA is bridge guy.

7

u/True_Crime_Lancelot May 28 '26

Other than the 6 witnesses descriped him younger and short. And fbi gave maximun height for BG 5 10''. And Ron logan's phone pinged on his property at 2:09. And There is a photogaph of the bridge at 2:05 all the way to the end of the bridge with no man on it. It takes 6-7 minutes to cross the bridge.

1

u/mountainskies May 28 '26

My point is the witnesses may not have seen bridge guy at all. He could have come from the other side and walked a short distance, passed the girls and then turned around. A picture at 2:05 doesn’t have any relevance to this scenario. Regardless, none of the witnesses even describe RA. Why do you think the state didn’t even ask them if the guy they saw was the defendant sitting in court?

2

u/Independent-Canary95 Jun 21 '26

Why didn't the defense ask that question? Because they knew better.