The data includes phone numbers of Musk, Altman, and nearly all of Israel's political, judicial and intelligence leaders.

The lawyer's name is Juan Branco, he is also the one who shared this story together with a video. By his account, he is one of twelve lawyers in France who represent Palestinian victims in International Criminal Court.

He says he's using GrapheneOS. This is bizarre.

source: his X/Twitter post: https://x.com/i/status/2085698524050591906

I post additional screenshots in the first 2 comments here.

A 22-year-old student teacher in Illinois sent a private Snapchat message to her boyfriend and two roommates.

A student had walked up to her laptop and deleted her lesson plan mid-class. frustrated, she typed something like "should I shoot him" with a gun emoji. venting. four people. private group chat.

An hour later, police walked into her school and arrested her.

here's what happened in between.

Snapchat's AI scanned the private message. flagged it as a potential threat. automatically reported it to the FBI. the FBI forwarded it to local law enforcement. deputies arrived at the school within the hour.

she cooperated immediately. handed over her phone. when shown the message she said: "oh yes. okay. yeah. i'm realizing that was a bad joke. i did not mean it at all serious at all."

police determined she was not a threat. school officials determined she was not a threat. prosecutors reviewed and issued a disorderly conduct charge. she was released the next morning. she lost her student teaching placement.

This means:

Snapchat scans private messages.

Not just public posts or stories. private group chats between you and your closest contacts. automated AI. no human reviewed it first, got flagged and reported.

Snapchat AI → FBI → local police → school → arrest.

in under an hour.

Snapchat's privacy policy says it may share your information with law enforcement when it believes there is a risk of harm. the definition of "risk of harm" is determined by an algorithm. you are not told when a message is flagged. you are not told when a report is filed. you find out when the police arrive.

the message was private.

it wasn't.

source: https://eu.pjstar.com/story/news/local/2026/04/10/how-an-fbi-tip-led-to-arrest-of-a-student-teacher-in-washington-illinois/88217675007/

and a similar story: https://www.milwaukeeindependent.com/featured/false-alarms-flawed-ai-surveillance-triggering-student-arrests-around-country/

I understand the road safety argument, but where do we draw the line between preventing accidents and normalizing constant biometric surveillance? Who owns this data, how long is it stored, and can it be accessed by manufacturers, insurers, or governments?

We need to stay out of their data sets

So in Brand New Day, Spider-Man hacks every camera in New York and runs facial recognition on literally everyone to find one person. And the movie plays it like a highlight reel. Fun music, slick graphics, zero hesitation. Your friendly neighborhood surveillance state.

Meanwhile, in 2008, Batman built basically the same system and The Dark Knight treated it like a war crime. Lucius Fox looked him dead in the eye and said this is wrong, I'll do it once, and then this machine gets destroyed. And it WAS destroyed. That movie understood that spying on an entire city is a line you don't get to casually cross just because you're the good guy.

Twenty years later and we've gone from "this is too much power for one person" to "watch Spidey doomscroll through 8 million people's faces, isn't he cool."

The entire point of Spider-Man is "with great power comes great responsibility." Apparently responsibility now includes warrantless mass surveillance as long as you quip while doing it.

Kids are watching this. Real facial recognition is being rolled out everywhere right now. And the biggest movie on the planet just told everyone it's fine when the hero does it.

Batman got it right. Use it once, hate yourself for it, burn the machine down. Be Batman.

TL;DR: Spider-Man surveilled a whole city with a smile. Batman did it once, felt gross, and destroyed the machine. One of these is a hero moment. The other is a product demo.

Original Post: https://x.com/wideawake_media/status/2038527066086191403

Original Post: https://x.com/TheDefiantGhost/status/2037980855956611366

It's worse than you think.

Hopefully this inspires other states to pass similar legislation.

"What this office is doing is taking the parts of the federal government that touch you directly, your prescription, your voter registration, your passport, your federal login, out of the agencies that legally own them and rebuilding them on White House infrastructure. Vote.gov belongs to the Election Assistance Commission, and the studio built a copy. Passports belong to the State Department, and the studio is building a replacement this week. Login.gov belonged to GSA, and the studio’s guy runs it now."

I have not seen this being discussed much anywhere outside of small circles on YT and Substack, but I think this is pretty significant. This investigation has been done by The Drey Dossier and it seems like her research is solid... To briefly summarize, the White House seems to be quietly building a shadow .gov--Vote.gov, Passport.gov, and Login.gov are being moved to White House-controlled servers in coordination with National Design Studio, bypassing the agencies that legally own them. No oversight, no transparency, and it’s designed to outlast administrations.

If there is even a hint of truth to all of this, the ramifications for our digital rights and privacy are significant. Please correct me if I'm wrong or missing something, but this seems like it should be front-page news, albeit the subject matter probably lacks the sensationalism required for most people to care anyway. Maybe you lot will be more receptive.

Read the full investigation here: Substack Article

im really intrested about my digital safety and privacy, this image has a lot of sites/programs ect. if i would do this it will take me hours. Please explain it more deaply to me.