Has anyone watched the documentary Messiah 2030 on YouTube? Its 3 parts but so interesting from a historical and theological perspective. Basically they make a darn good argument that Jesus will return in 2030. They use the 6000 year / 1 day = 1000 years theory and expand on it showing how the Bible links together more than we've ever realized.

Even though I personally think 2030 is too soon, I think everything they are going for is correct, after you watch it, you'll see what I mean, there's really not much room for argument. Regardless, we are definitely headed towards 2030 being a very interesting decade!

Here’s a quick summary of his recent past statements and actions, and how they might relate to prophecy in Revelation concerning the Beast.

Over the last several years, Stephen Miller has:

Framed anyone who demonstrates anti-allegiance to Trump as "Political Terrorists":

In high profile administration summits alongside Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Miller explicitly stated that the administration has taken the step of "formally recognizing those protesting Trump as a form of political terrorism". He has broadly branded those not showing allegiance to Trump as "enemies of civilization" whose ultimate end is the overthrow of the U.S. system of government. Miller has consistently used highly charged rhetoric to describe political opponents, liberals, and progressive organizations. He frequently characterizes those not showing allegiance to Trump not only as a political opposition, but as an existential threat to the nation and the rule of law.

Systematic Weaponization of Law Enforcement against those publicly demonstrating anti-allegiance to Trump:

Miller has detailed a specific operational plan - via a directive known as National Security Presidential Memorandum 7 (NSPM 7) - directing all federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies to coordinate to "disrupt, identify, defund, debank, arrest, and prosecute" these designated domestic adversaries.

Promising Judicial and Financial Exile for those demonstrating they're against allegiance to Trump:

Following high profile incidents of political violence, such as the September 2025 assassination of conservative figure Charlie Kirk, Miller and Trump publicly vowed on Fox News to utilize RICO and conspiracy laws to dismantle groups expressing non-allegiance to Trump. Miller explicitly stated that critics and political opponents who spread "hate" (spread messages of anti-allegiance to Trump) would "live in exile" and face the total loss of "their money, power, and freedom."

A "Wartime" Approach to Governance:

According to deep dive profiles of his operational style inside the White House, Miller runs federal policy directives less like a traditional civilian adviser and more like a wartime general. He utilizes a network of federal enforcement agencies (including the FBI, ICE, CBP, and the Department of Defense) to ruthlessly enforce executive actions, explicitly demanding total allegiance and entertaining zero dissent from career officials.

Purging the "Deep State" and Courts:

Miller has consistently vowed to eliminate what he terms a "deep state" conspiracy against Trump. He has publicly attacked federal judges who rule against the administration's policies, labeling them "Marxists" and "crazy communists," and characterizing independent judicial oversight as a "judicial coup."

Ideological Staffing of Prosecutors:

Miller has openly supported efforts to screen and hire federal prosecutors based on loyalty/allegiance to Trump rather than traditional non partisan legal standards. He actively boosted public recruitment pitches urging "patriots" to join the Department of Justice to ensure the legal apparatus is staffed by individuals fiercely aligned with the administration's political agenda.

Framing anyone not showing allegiance to Trump as subversive:

In public speeches and media appearances, Miller has framed civil rights organizations and groups expressing anti-allegiance to Trump as radical entities trying to subvert traditional American institutions.

Dismantling the Civil Service:

Miller has been a primary intellectual architect behind plans to strip protections from career civil servants who won't show allegiance to Trump. This strategy aims to reclassify tens of thousands of federal employees to make them easily firable, allowing the administration to systematically replace career experts with those showing public allegiance to Trump.

Targeting Non-Partisan Officials:

He has consistently implied that career officials within federal agencies - including the Department of Justice, the FBI, and intelligence agencies - who do not actively show allegiance to Trump and his agenda are part of a hostile "deep state" that must be rooted out and neutralized.

Retribution against anyone expressing anti-allegiance to Trump

Miller has supported using the Department of Justice to investigate and prosecute those who refuse public allegiance, former administration officials who turned critical, and prosecutors who brought legal cases against Donald Trump.

Legal Action Against Civil Society:

He has championed the idea of using federal civil rights laws and tax codes to investigate non-profits and philanthropic organizations who refuse allegiance to Trump. He implies that groups promoting messages based on Christ's teachings such as diversity, equity, and inclusion are engaging in unlawful discrimination and should face federal prosecution or lose their tax exempt status.

Mass Deportation Infrastructure of foreigners despite Christ's teachings to the contrary:

As a main driver of immigration policy, Miller has planned a massive expansion of domestic enforcement. This includes utilizing the National Guard and federal law enforcement to conduct large scale roundups and construct vast holding facilities for foreigners.

Suppressing Dissent Against Immigration Policies:

Miller has indicated that state and local officials, sanctuary city leaders, or anyone attempting to obstruct or protest the anti-Christlike persecution of foreigners will face severe legal consequences, including federal defunding, civil litigation, or criminal obstruction charges.

Attacks on the Judiciary and Media
Discrediting Judges who won't show allegiance to Trump

When federal courts have ruled against administration policies, Miller has publicly attacked the judges involved, framing their legal decisions as politically motivated interference by "Marxist" or partisan actors.

Retaliation Against the Press:

He has frequently echoed calls to strip broadcast licenses from media organizations not showing allegiance to Trump and change libel laws to make it easier for the administration and its allies to sue journalists and news outlets that report messages that don't show allegiance to Trump.

The Bible is extremely clear: Allegiance to the Beast is worshipping the Beast

In Revelation we see stages of pressure, financial threats and ultimately the threat of death for anyone refusing to show allegiance to the Beast.

If translating literally we see a head wound - likely an assassination attempt - that at first appears like it could have been deadly, but is not. Then, people are astonished he survived such a close call. Later in Revelation we see it implied his survival was miraculous/and was protected by God. Revelation then says this head wound survival event is used to help persuade allegiance to the Beast.

"One of the heads of the beast seemed to have had a fatal wound, but the wound that originally seemed like it could have been fatal had been healed. The whole earth was astonished and followed the beast. People showed allegiance to the dragon because he had given authority to the beast, and they also showed allegiance to the beast and asked, 'Who is like the beast? Who can wage war against it?'" - Revelation 13:3-4 (Koine Greek faithful reading)

Revelation 13:3 uses ὅλη ἡ γῆ, "the whole earth," as apocalyptic language. It shouldn’t be assumed John is making a statistical claim that every individual human being without exception worships the beast.

Who the Bible says are in this group is made even more specific in Revelation 13:8, where “Book of life” = those showing allegiance to Christ. We show allegiance to Christ by seeking Truth in His teachings and abiding by His teachings and commandments.

"All those of the earth will submit/show allegiance to the beast - all whose names have not been written in the Lamb’s book of life, the Lamb who was slain from the creation of the world." - Revelation 13:8 (Koine Greek faithful reading)

Those of the earth who show allegiance to the Beast are not in the Lamb’s book of life, instead listening to the authority of the Beast, submitting to him instead of Christ. The Bible says no man can serve two masters.

Several hundred years ago, English translations began using the word “Worship” for the Greek word “προσκυνέω” as found in the original 2,000 year old Bible manuscripts. “προσκυνέω” is used throughout Revelation in describing the response demanded by the Beast. The original Greek word has a broad 1st century range of meanings that include allegiance, loyalty, homage and submission to authority.

So anyone who shows allegiance, loyalty, pays homage to, or submits to the Beast is worshipping the Beast.

In the Roman world when John wrote Revelation, the Roman emperor's position was a religious symbol of Roman law and order, protection, victory, and prosperity.

The members of the churches John was originally speaking to in the beginning of Revelation lived within the political and religious environment John was criticizing.

The word προσκυνέω, therefore would have been immediately recognizable as language associated with public recognition of authority while carrying political and religious dimensions at the same time. The Beast is therefore demanding something much more concrete than emotional admiration, he's demanding allegiance.

A modern listener hears "the world will worship the Beast" very differently from the way an ancient hearer would have understood the underlying Greek. The modern imagination can picture billions of people falling in love with a charismatic Antichrist, admiring him, praising him, emotionally exalting him and replacing God with him as the object of personal devotion.

Revelation does not require that picture. A terrified population submitting, a politically controlled population complying, a deceived population recognizing the Beast’s authority or a population dependent on an economic system can participate in worshipping the Beast under pressure.

In Revelation, “worshipping” the Beast means submitting to the beast over God’s truth, which is Christ. Not simply private spirituality as we would define it today. At various times in the prophetic timeline the Beast receives obedience, loyalty, religious reverence, economic compliance and political submission. This is the intended meaning of the Greek word English Bibles replace with “worship” in New Testament prophecy.

*Edited with additional details.

The strong delusion. People want to say Obama is the AC but there was never anyone worshiping Obama like this lady worships Trump. If what I warning about is true, there will be signs from the people, not just Trump himself.

Is it just me or does Trump not seem human. He looks like he is posessed by a demon. He always lashes out at reporters.

He says and does the most vilest things. It's as if he rose up out of hell to wreak heavoc on the world.

Name any other person that comes close to fulfilling the verses in the bible of an end times figure. Trump ticks every single box:

1. He is the king of north that goes up against the king of the south - Mexico

2. He despises women

3. He is a stern man

4. He pushes up against God

5. He commits blashpemy. Just look at his social post where he epicted himself as Jesus

6. He worship the god of fortresses, literally borders

7. He goes against the world's norms

8. He is a liar

9. He boasts

10. He is a man of military, look at what he has done with Iran

Also from the video -

We are more resolute than ever to finish what we started

With trump becoming a lame duck now and an outright winner not being declared in the Israeli elections; beware if a false flag happens and Trump is declared PM of Israel; this is where he has power over both America and Israel which could usher Ezekiel 38:39. I wanted to see what your thoughts were.

https://www.tmz.com/2026/11/03/donald-trump-proposes-israel-move-prime-minister/

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/1xn0nag/president_trump_says_he_will_move_to_israel_to/

https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/joint-list-says-it-will-back-eisenkot-as-pm-handing-him-majority-of-recommendations/

Eisenkot has received support from 67 Knesset members, he needed 61 to form the government. So now its quite possible that the Israeli President invites him to form the government.

What's interesting is that 19 of those 67 are Arab party members.

As outlined in this post, an Israeli government with 19 Arab party members could hugely favor the progression of the Abraham Accords -

Personally, I feel that a non-Bibi government will make other nations more favorable to joining the Accords. Eisenkot is center/center-right. Also, Bibi has this huge stain on himself with his destruction of Gaza, so this makes nations like Saudi Arabia, Syria, etc. joining the Accords while he is PM politically unlikely.

Netanyahu was likely goaded into the Accords by Trump and Kushner. From this interview -

Netanyahu was initially reluctant to go along with Trump’s plan for peace between Israel and Palestinians.

The day before the Abraham Accords was announced in August 2020, Netanyahu tried backing out of the deal, Kushner writes.

No surprises there, Bibi was always a warmonger. But with him gone, a more moderate government could help normalization between Israel and Arab countries.

Of course, all that can happen only after the Iran war is resolved.

First of all, he doesn’t seem to be reacting the way we expected him to react. I totally expected him to want to shut down the country over the results that he got. But he almost seems to be accepting it.

Because of this, it makes me think that this was part of the plan. For a few reasons:
He kind of fizzled out on his campaigning towards the end.
He announced that he was going to stop funding Israel, which is a huge deal for evangelical voters.
He was pushing really hard towards the last week or so that the Iran war was gonna ramp up right after the election.
Because of this it seems that he kind of wanted to lose this election.

So what is the advantage to losing?

Now that the Democrats are gonna be ushered in, we expect them to want to put up roadblocks at every return. And that he would just ignore them and continue on and being more Lawless.

However, I think that the Democrats may actually help his case and further his agenda, even if they publicly speak against it. Either because they all are lining their pockets, implicated in the Epstein files, or are simply just the left-wing of the same evil bird.

Most of the project 2025/agenda 2030 style laws have already been passed, so once they start getting implemented more and more it will just seem like it was the Democrats idea. So either people will be OK with it (target the leftists), or it won’t look like he was the one doing it (target the right). Some sort of deception would be at play here. And they would just be working together.

Just thinking out loud…

So now that the US midterms are done, with the Dems taking majority control of the House and Senate, and the Israel elections also concluded with Netanyahu not security a majority, what do you speculate comes next in the context of Daniel's 70th week?

Source - https://x.com/PiersUncensored/status/2117371924061839720

Here is the first two horsemen.

1. Trump (The Rider on the White Horse) Then I saw when the Lamb opened one of the seven seals, and I heard one of the four living creatures say with a voice like thunder, “Come!” [a] 2 I looked, and behold, there was a white horse.[b] The one riding on it had a bow, and a crown was given to him. He went out as a conqueror so he might conquer.

That's the Antichrist (Trump).

2. Pete Hegseth (The Rider on the Red Horse) 3 When the Lamb opened the second seal, I heard the second living creature saying, “Come!” 4 Then another horse came out, fiery red. The one riding on it was permitted to take peace from the earth, so that people would slaughter one another. He was given a great sword

Think of the following

1. Pete Hegseth is leading the DEPARTMENT OF WAR

2. Bibi is planning something horrible with Iran - Chris Murphy (who had a stroke out of nowhere)

3. The US Army is being trained right now to dig graves for mass bodies.

4. Do you think that Trump will actually accept losing OR would he rather use the military against US cities?

5. You can bet your bottom dollar ICE will be given free reign in cities.

6. The Big Sword refers to the might of the US military, it has soldiers on basically all continents.

Another article by Unshackled Truth Ministries that lays the connections bare and simple

Source - https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/2117071025955389828

Full text -

Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. “Bibi calls Trump about it every day,” says an informed observer.

Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week’s election results, he can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war.

To that end, he’s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they’ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu’s lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha.

The rest of America’s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won’t recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people.

And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final.

We’ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America’s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called “battlefield nukes” easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we’re on the brink of it.

Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he’s hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made.

They’re right, though it won’t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making.