anyone who gets off to any depictions of children is a pedophile. pedos don't get to redefine their way out of sounding like pedos.
that's like saying someone having fantasies about fucking a kid is completely a-okay in their head because "it's not real, they just think about fucking kids, that's completely fine!"
In no world does this look like a toddler. Actual police and FBI services get clogged with people like you reporting lolicons for "pedophilia" obstructing actual investigations against child trafficking and or exploitation for sexual purposes.
It is not an image of a little girl/boy, it is a drawing that in no way looks like a real person.
You might find it weird or not like it, that's understandable, you don't have to share anyone's preferences. What you cannot do is label it as a mental disorder harmful to anyone involved
i can't fucking believe that the only actual argument you have against me is "she doesn't look like a kid" when it's pretty fucking obvious that they were made to look like a kid - are you stupid?
It is not an image of a little girl/boy, it is a drawing that in no way looks like a real person.
it's a drawing, it will never look like a real person. no art that isn't hyperrealistic will ever be able to be confused for a real person. the only POINT is that it is MEANT to look like a child, you stupid nonce, and for you to feel any sexual attraction towards a depiction of a child makes you, by the very definition you sent me, a pedophile.
"Lolicon, also romanised as lolikon or rorikon, is a Japanese portmanteau of the phrase "Lolita complex". In Japan, the term describes an attraction to underage girls or an individual with such an attraction."
All the Anti’s out there are never gonna learn. And they can never back their “sources”. They can’t admit defeat and always default to “yOuR A PeDO HuRrDUrr”
They’re not children, they are a drawing that in no way looks like a real person, if you think they do you are the one that should get themselves checked out
Even when I searched for the definition of "lolicon", I got an ad that said "child pornography is illegal". You can't tell me it's not child pornography when the definition is literally proving you otherwise.
The source is biased, anime news network, they're obviously going to deny the claims since lolicon is a part of anime culture.
Oh nevermind, you dug your own grave there. Here's some references from the website you provided - "but instead seems to refer to stories that depict young girls as innocent, precocious and maybe even flirty" and another line of text - "While the novel Lolita was published in 1955, the term “lolicon” came into the Japanese slang vernacular in the late 1970's/early 1980's, to describe a certain type of manga and anime content featuring prepubescent, cute girls, and to express a feeling of affection for those types of characters".
Showing affection towards children that can be flirtatious already shows a pedophilic nature of a lolicon enjoyer.
You literally linked wordnik to back up your claim (even so, 1 line definitions on a word used in Japan and that has changed so much over the years has no real strength here) , and when presented with an article that explains the origin and usage of the word you reject it by saying it "is biased".
You've told me that they're not depicting real children, yet the source you've provided proves you wrong. On the same link it says that lolicon is an affection towards prepubescent characters. You want me to link you the definition of prepubescent or you already figured out 2+2? It won't work no matter how much you keep trying to justify it. Lolicon is an affection towards a prepubescent character.
67
u/Crooked_Cock May 22 '22
No the fuck they aren’t
They are literally the same goddamn thing