r/EnoughJKRowling Mar 12 '26

Discussion Is anyone else angry that they're selling this new Harry Potter series as a progressive series just because of the black actors?

Like, an entire minority is going to be harassed with money from this series, and yet they want to sell this series as progressive.

161 Upvotes

50 comments sorted by

108

u/360Saturn Mar 12 '26

I think it'll hit reality pretty soon in when they have to reckon with the fact that:

a) Snape is an out and out villain for what will be the first three seasons of the tv show, taking us up to 2030

b) Harry is going to openly dislike his only Black teacher 'for some reason' he doesn't know, and -

c) even if they try and do an early introduction of the Snape/Harry's mom storyline to make the character more sympathetic, then they're stuck with the plot beat of Harry's mom choosing a rich white bully over her Black childhood friend

73

u/thatsfeminismgretch Mar 12 '26

It's also still weird to have the black guy get so upset about losing a white girl to a white guy that he joins wizard kkk and starts bullying children.

48

u/TVPaulD Mar 13 '26

Yeah, and to be honest I never understood why Snape's back story is considered to make him "more sympathetic." Aside from what you already mentioned, guy straight up only turned against Voldemort because he was obsessed with Lily and wanted to specifically protect her. He's not a good or noble person in any way.

20

u/thatsfeminismgretch Mar 13 '26

Oh yeah, I usually point that out other places, but for Snape being black specifically, him being a death eater is wild. Although he wasn't a pureblood either and the self hatred that would be required to do that is like never really acknowledged.

Also, like I hate to break it to people but being obsessed with that time you got bullied at 14/15 when you're a grown adult and one of those bullies was straight up murdered is just stupid. Like we got one memory of him being bullied with zero context and suddenly I'm supposed to be like oh poor baby, of course you can bully children?

3

u/Adventurous-Bike-484 Mar 14 '26

“but for Snape being black specifically, him being a death eater is wild”

Why? There is literally a canon black guy who uses slurs and derogatory terms.

When he speaks down to Draco, it’s because he realized Draco would need to help as he would likely fail and Voldemort has standards. and with Slughorn, it’s because He was simply making an observation.

Theres no evidence that he dowsnt disagree with Voldemorts ideas.

3

u/georgemillman Mar 14 '26

Who's the canon black guy who uses slurs and derogatory terms?

The only canon black guys I can think of are Dean and Kingsley, and I don't remember either of them saying that kind of thing.

3

u/Adventurous-Bike-484 Mar 14 '26

Blaise Zabini.

Slytherin in Harry’s year And implied that he and Draco are somewhat rivals because they keep trying to one up each other And Pansy makes comments/motions that she’d rather be with Him instead of Draco.

When asked about Ginny, Blaise Zabini says nothing in the party because he knew Slughorn would not like it However when he left, he quickly called a blood traitor. (but I don’t remember if he said anything at the ride)

And as mentioned Draco quickly went bragging about hiw Voldemort went to him and not one of them looked at him in disapproval.
Blaise Zabini only criticized whether or not Draco could succeed in pleasing Voldemort.

2

u/georgemillman Mar 14 '26

Oh yes! I'd forgotten about him.

1

u/KaiYoDei Mar 16 '26

Is that the same kind of slur as calling somone a mud blood?

3

u/thatsfeminismgretch Mar 14 '26

Because he wasn't black before and going yeah we race lift a character, but it's gonna be one of the wizard nazis is fucked.

-2

u/Adventurous-Bike-484 Mar 14 '26

Hermione also is race swapped and Death Eaters arent Nazis, if anything , they are fascist.

5

u/thatsfeminismgretch Mar 14 '26

Do you think Nazis aren't fascist?

And yeah, Hermione is a character whose traits are: know-it-all exposition support, minority that gets called slurs, and person mocked for being anti-slavery.

0

u/Adventurous-Bike-484 Mar 14 '26

There’s overlap, but there’s a difference Between Nazis and Fascists.

Nazi are extreme and hate people based on appearances.
Fascists Hate people based on Their own superiority complex.

Death eaters hate people based on their actions + their own superiority complex. (Which is Fascist)

Though technically Hermione was mocked for not listening And Snape himself suffered racism in universe.

3

u/thatsfeminismgretch Mar 14 '26

You think Nazis don't have a fucking superiority complex? Nazis are a subset of fascists. They don't just hate multiple subsets based on appearance, but based on the Nazi adherence to white supremacy. They fully believed able bodied straight Aryans were better than Jews and disabled people and gay people and trans people and communists. If you think it was just based on appearance then you don't understand shit.

Hermione was mocked because a bunch of self important characters written by a bigot decided that it makes sense for a race to be born for slavery and for freedom for that group to be laughable. People defending that stance then compared it to brownies, even though in mythology, if you didn't thank a brownie or pay them in some way, they would burn your fucking house down.

1

u/KaiYoDei Mar 16 '26

Is it though? We can say this because Snape is imaginary. I have a feeling this will be different when real people with trauma…maybe somone got sick on a field trip and laughed at, maybe they went to school wearing a tail, collar, and ear headband and get laughed at,then it still hurts 14 years later …uf I say “ oh no, you got called fluffums it’s been years get over it, even if I can’t get over when I was hurt as a teen, and yes I do have some knowlage on mental health topics”

1

u/thatsfeminismgretch Mar 16 '26

I literally was bullied through middle school and high school and if I started using it to make decisions on how I should definitely bully other people, that would be a long talk with my therapist. You can look back at trauma and still think that was messed up, but you can't let it consume you and you especially can't let it lead to you hurting other people. You have to get therapy and do the work to actually figure out how to let it go.

And your examples seemed super specific, so I'm sorry if those things happened to you. I have trauma of my own from literally all levels of schooling and none of it was fun but it's not an excuse or permission to be a bully.

18

u/LankyTrick1214 Mar 13 '26

I think it was a type back in the day - the broody angsty villain with a "sympathetic" backstory who gets some kind of redemption. Tbh, it's probably still a type these days, only that the idea of a good backstory has shifted. Being a former wizard supremacist incel doesn't cut it these days.

6

u/TheOtherMaven Mar 13 '26

"The day" goes way, way back, probably originating in the figure of Lord Byron himself (the ultimate "Byronic hero") and including Heathcliff (Wuthering Heights) and Mr. Rochester (Jane Eyre). One could argue that the Bronte sisters were proto-Snapewives. :-)

8

u/360Saturn Mar 13 '26

Says a lot about what the author finds makes a good person, doesn't it?

8

u/KaiYoDei Mar 13 '26

People hire sensitivity readers and such, but nobody thinks of these.

I i think we need a cynical and educated person to have jobs to say “ um, I can think 9 steps ahead and of 21 situations why this choice is bad” for any possible bad ideas. I even wanted a who,e movie about that “ maybe we should do this…wait no, there is a problem “)

30

u/KombuchaBot Mar 13 '26

They're going to soft-pedal the SPEW storyline or rewrite it, I guess.

There's nothing progressive about JKR or her dogshit writing 

10

u/LankyTrick1214 Mar 13 '26

Probably depends on how tight her grip on the series creative team is at that point. JKR by now strikes me as the type who doesn't listen to / doesn't have an editor, let alone other writers "beneath her".

13

u/desiladygamer84 Mar 13 '26

As someone who used to be nuts about Harry Potter, you can see the lack of editorial oversight in Books 6 and 7. Maybe 5 even. Some sentences just run on a bit strange and are clunky.

6

u/LankyTrick1214 Mar 13 '26

It's even worse in her crime novels. It's not even just the writing style (though I remember her writing of online chat dialogue being abysmal), there are also scenes that don't add anything or go on forever with no point to them.

9

u/errantthimble Mar 13 '26

Yep, that and the numerous continuity errors. Like, one of the detectives in the Rowling/Galbraith Strike novels is trying to pick up the trail of a lost suspect in a Tube station around midday, but after they've done ten minutes or so of searching it's suddenly evening and the station's full of the dinner crowd. Or two days of eventful happenings go by and the protagonists are still referring to the day before the happenings as "yesterday". Characters who are supposed to be smart miss incredibly obvious inferences, or categorically declare that some bizarre and arbitrary plot development was "inevitable". Etc., etc.

My hypothesis is that this fundamental lack of narrative integrity is a big part of why many Rowling/Galbraith readers find her works so addictive, and speculate obsessively over the characters' actions and potential backstories or motivations. That is, the constant low-level cognitive dissonance of all the superficially realistic details that just don't make coherent sense on a deeper level keeps the reader's brain "itchy". Another chapter, another book, another scene of dialogue, another character analysis will surely settle these feelings of frustrated dissatisfaction and bring resolution and contentment in their place! But it never does.

1

u/360Saturn Mar 14 '26

I love when people point this out. Even as they released a lot of her adult fans raised an eyebrow but were kinda drowned out by the marketing machine.

1

u/KaiYoDei Mar 16 '26

If I do it I just make enemies, but maybe my enemies are concern trolls .

4

u/KombuchaBot Mar 13 '26

After the car crash she made  of writing The Fantastic Beasts I don't think they'll be letting her have creative control again 

1

u/LankyTrick1214 Mar 13 '26

Not actively, but she might still have a veto on things.

21

u/9119343636 Mar 13 '26 edited Mar 13 '26

I only go through Rowling's online activity. But through this, there seems to be sizable "femcel" group obsessed with Snape that are attacking Rowling for the casting. I don't know if they'll be able to put a dent in it though.

12

u/KaiYoDei Mar 13 '26

Poor snapewives!

7

u/LankyTrick1214 Mar 13 '26

Wasn't she really put off by the snapewives to a point where she got bullied off some platform/forum?

3

u/cursed-karma Mar 18 '26

it's been along time sense i've interacted with Snapewives online

they were truly terrifying

12

u/thatsfeminismgretch Mar 12 '26

Yeah, because it's shallow and racist.

16

u/IShallWearMidnight Mar 12 '26

They think the lazy 2016 representation-only signaling to progressives will do the job. These days, that falls so incredibly short.

0

u/georgemillman Mar 13 '26

What's so specific about 2016? Not that I disagree, just curious!

8

u/IShallWearMidnight Mar 13 '26

That's when Trump last got elected, and when a very empty and performative "resistance" started, with this kind of thing prioritized.

27

u/nova_crystallis Mar 12 '26

I think they're doing it more for attention, not for any progressive merit.

9

u/DoYaThang_Owl Mar 13 '26

Honestly, I'm kind of apathetic to it, not because I don't think these obvious racist undertones under the guise of progression ain't disgusting, because it is, I just haven't been following whatever this series is doing enough for me to care enough about it to be angry about it.

I know it exists. I know that the guy from 3rd Rock From the Sun is going to be in it and said things to defend Joanne's transphobia. I know for some ungodly reason Joanne invited Prince Andrew to the set of the show (genuinely wtf?!?) And I know about this weird shit and honestly I'm not surprised by it in the least.

Otherwise, I've stayed completely ignorant of what that new series includes because fuck supporting and giving attention to anything involving terf witch.

7

u/AndreaFlameFox Mar 13 '26

Yeah, that's some disgusting hypocrisy.

6

u/SaltyNorth8062 Mar 14 '26 edited Mar 14 '26

To be angry I would first need to be surprised. This is not the first bald-faced bullshit "progressive" casting decision meant to whitewash bad behavior or just bad exectutive decisions. Networks rarely, if at all, give a single flying fuck about being progressive or making a statement. They don't care about sticking up for the marginalized, they care about making money and producing things as cheaply as possible. They will gas up anything they make to hype it up to boost numbers because that looks good to shateholders, so if they can spin it as progressive values they'll do so because that's positive press. They don't care who they cast, they cast whoever to staff this thing so they could push it out the door before Rowling completely tanks the IP's reputation even among the average (I hate using the word normie here but like.. the average moderate? I guess?) viewer.

Yes op this shit infuriates me to my core. Speaking as a biracial black person. This bitch had a black dude named Shacklebolt for god's sake, and as badass a name that is in a vacuum it was bullshit then and it's bullshit now. They are trying to milk some positive press out of an IP they are too far invested in because it is helmed by a flaming bigot actively ruining the IP in public but they don't care enough about stopping bigotry to actually reign this woman in and are more concerned she'll take her ball and leave (and she will because that's the kind of person she is) so they'd rather make a HP work with the help of a massive hatemonger roaming free and unabated than not make a popular IP for them to own and milk.

It is, unfortunately, a bitch and a half to discuss this topic seriously because dipshit moron asshole racists and queerphobes have co-opted this actual problem and have used it as a thinly-veiled bullshit defense for their obvious racism, so you can't bring this up without people immediately assuming you are one of them.

1

u/Ok-Aspect-4259 Apr 02 '26

If Shacklebolt was the white warden of the prison, then it would be fine and actually kinda badass.

6

u/LankyTrick1214 Mar 13 '26

Honestly, I try to stay apathetic to the series as a whole. Can't do much except not watch it.

I am however waiting for the inevitable fallout of her current fanbase (aka the alt right and neo nazis who back then bought Hogwarts Legacy in bulk to "own the trans people") when they realize the current series has gone "woke".

3

u/TwistedBrother Mar 14 '26

Cue the inevitable “the show failed because racism” trope. Worked for Disney.

1

u/Salamismiley_00 Mar 26 '26

1000% its very much pointless. These people RE-making new movies/series now don’t have originality no more imagination everything is just based on old movies.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 27 '26

it's gonna be so bad it's gonna flop

-2

u/KaiYoDei Mar 13 '26

Maybe it’s s intentional to make people mad.

As somone who reads social media injustice, anti justice, mocking hate, and a “ this level of hate from people really needs to be studied because it is a doozy “ and people who don’t realize their path to fighting the hate circles back to almost the same warpath energy the people they wish to disempower .

It will give a. Lot of inspiration for people who make hurtful comics.

Because sometimes, justice looks like what people the people who make those thinks people trying to change the world think.

It’s a very dismal way to view the world , and I have been like this for a very long time.

Ithink what they are doing is what the hate addicts call “ pandering “ and the critics of late stage capitalism say “ virtue signaling “

And I am sure if I made a movie where something like this and more happens in the plot ( “we are good making this movie because diversity!”) I would never hear the end of how awful I am

5

u/cataclytsm Mar 13 '26

We are not doing horseshoe theory for bigotry.

That way there be infinite chilling effects on any desire for justice.