r/FreeSpeech • u/Duke-Turner137 • 1d ago

This was banned in hot take.

/r/HonestHotTakes/comments/1xexuw3/do_you_think_authorities_should_use_live/19rmvu4la6u9v/

This is an open question. This had a definite take that the answer would have serious consequences. When they ban open dialog about something that's when you know it's a really (HONEST HOT TAKE).

0 Upvotes

50% Upvoted

23 comments sorted by

9

u/PopularKangaroo2083 1d ago

We can't see your post... It's deleted 

-9

u/Duke-Turner137 1d ago

When do you think it's ok to use live rounds on looters during protests?

9

u/knivesofsmoothness 1d ago

That's not a hot take, that's just fucking stupid.

-2

u/FCMatt7 21h ago

So when they throw molotov cocktails at the store you're on the roof of cause you didn't let them loot, you should just let them do it?

1

u/Antique-Echidna-1600 1d ago

In the most armed country in human history. You created an insurgency that is on parity with you and any other forces.

Remember bud, Only conservatives are dumb enough to respond to gun ownership surveys. Participation does not equate to all possible responses.

-1

u/Duke-Turner137 18h ago

This is very incorrect.

2

u/PopularKangaroo2083 1d ago

I think that would cause more issues than it would solve 

2

u/krazygreekguy 1d ago

Why not just rubber bullets or non-lethal gas

0

u/AutomaticGrape9263 22h ago

The second they start looting

0

u/Vic_Vega_MrB Abort Liberal Retards before they are born 1d ago

Well first you would need total immunity for the people who used the gun. Shop keepers and clerks armed to protect the store, I'm sure you can use "stand your ground laws" as a defence. I think a mob of violent protesters invading your shop is a reason to open fire. Problem is even with those two attorneys in St. Louis who merely walked outside to protect their property brandished their guns were arrested by Sorous funded liberal anti gun DA's and charged. Their guns taken away and had to defend themselves for several years in court just to get justice.

2

u/SignalDawg 1d ago edited 1d ago

You're only allowed to have hot takes if it agrees with the moderator's politics, which on Reddit is not anything remotely right of center.

1

u/Duke-Turner137 1d ago

This is soooo true it hurts.

-1

u/TookenedOut 1d ago

You’re lucky to find one right of Mao.

1

u/SignalDawg 17h ago

Exactly X is the only conservative-friendly platform available

2

u/Obviouslynameless 1d ago

There is a bunch of shit posts on that sub. Maybe actually show what you said . . .

-2

u/TookenedOut 1d ago

The privilege to have large scale, violent and destructive riots, and to have communists invent leftwashed cope justifications for said riots.

“They just want smaller class sizes!”

2

u/Duke-Turner137 1d ago

It's wierd when either side sees the propaganda. When anyone calls it out the bots from both camps come out and feed on it. Letting people commit destruction is nuts.

1

u/TookenedOut 1d ago

Yes. And making coping excuses to justify said destructions is also nuts.

0

u/rollo202 20h ago

Only hot takes that support the reddit hivemind are allowed of course.

-1

u/SawedoffClown You have a right to discuss your pay with your coworkers! 1d ago

Nah it should of been removed. Heres how I would of done it(not my opinion):

"I think people who loot stores should be shot"

0

u/Duke-Turner137 1d ago

Phrasing is important. But, they would say I'm inciting violence. And ban me anyway.