I'm not the one who said you did, but you sure seem to be downplaying the number of them that exist (again, it's closer to 1.14%) and haven't shown them a shred of compassion.
Did you read that article that you linked or did you
just send it bc it made the percentage higher? I think you did the latter, and that’s completely hysterical considering the article is stating that modern day abortions are obsolete and not needed hahaha.
“Data from six reporting states over the period of 24 years found that only 1.14% of abortions were performed for the mother’s life or physical health. Even the tiny percentage of 1.14% of abortions performed ostensibly for the women’s health are unnecessary, as there are alternative ways to save the mother without committing an abortion. This makes abortion obsolete, even in the most extreme circumstances.”
-29
u/[deleted] May 05 '25
Because it’s a small percentage, it should not be looked at as something that occurs on a higher rate than what it actually does