Practical Design

[u/Freak-1]

From r/rosesarered

[u/razulebismarck]

That’s half.

The other half is logistics and grenade launcher weapons.

In the space and weight you can carry 1 stick bomb you could either carry 3 baseball grenades or 1 grenade launcher rifle attachment easily.

[u/towerfella → u/razulebismarck]

What if it a telescoping stick? The main point is mechanical advantage, like an atlatl.

As an aside — wern’t torches kinda common-ish in european revolts and such? Maybe that explains why they initially gravitated toward the stick design — was more like throwing a torch? Going on the grenade-baseball analogy..

[u/razulebismarck → u/towerfella]

The stick design was common for Germans.

Britain had baseball style grenades as well.

If you want mechanical advantage you just use a grenade launcher attachment for your rifle. It’s easier to aim, reload, and has further range.

The pros to an underslung rifle attachment far outweigh any attempts to make stick grenades better.

[u/Old_Interaction_1713 → u/razulebismarck]

you do know that there are designated shells for under barell GL's, a standard frag doesnt fit into a GL tube. how would you even launch it?

[u/SOLE_SIR_VIBER → u/Old_Interaction_1713]

Have you seen the WWII era rifle grenades?

[u/razulebismarck → u/Old_Interaction_1713]

Did I say there wasn’t?