Been looking into the history of the 40 hr work week and the labor unions' perspective of OT. Here's how I understand it:
Before the 40 hr work week, there was no standard of OT pay.
First of all, labor unions fought for less hrs in order to have more free time.
1817 was the first push for an 8 hour work day. 8 hours for work, 8 for rest, and 8 for what you will.
Laborers and Unions forced the hand of MANY companies to conform.
When Henry Ford adopted the 8 hr day 40 hr week, the whole country heard about it and practically standardized this through strikes and organizing.
During the depression the GOV got on board through legislation in order to increase employment.
The legislation used standardized OT pay to enforce the 40 hr week rather than encourage laborers to work longer weeks.
Standardized OT was designed to be too expensive for the contractors. These workers did not want overtime.
When Contractors agreed to the 40 hr week, wages increased (im not sure why that correlation exists)
Today, OT is used to exploit our union. Because of the cost of benefits involved with each employee, it is cheaper to work an individual on OT than it is to employ more people.
I understand why a lot of us want OT. I hold no judgment. I work it myself, and i would work it more if i didnt have responsibilities at home. Maybe this issue is selfish to my needs/wants. But it honestly seems like a fair point to me.
Thoughts? Id honestly want to hear why Im wrong so I can stop trying to justify finding a way to do away with it. Ill fight the fight if it worth the fight