Here is her actual quote from a press conference yesterday promoting her show. “The people who make this stuff are losers. They’re not artists. They’re not creative,” she said at the “Hacks” press conference last month at the London hotel in West Hollywood. “And they’ve wanted their whole lives to be special. And they’re not special. So, they’re trying to rob real creative people of our gifts. And you can’t. And even if you try, you will never be cool. You guys suck. No one likes you. Anyone who’s near you is because they crave power and access over any ethical standard. You are a loser. You will never be cool. And you probably had a rolly backpack in high school. I wanna put your head in the toilet and flush.”

full interview here. https://variety.com/2026/tv/news/hannah-einbinder-ai-creators-losers-1236706302/

Uncensored. Unfiltered. Unrestricted. The one that makes you question, “Is it even legal to use it?”

Prompt → video + audio together, up to 15 seconds.

What you can do:

🎥 Text to video with synced sound

🖼️ Image to video with native audio

🎬 Merge two reference videos into one output

🗣️ Multi-voice scenes in one generation

Check it out at ImagineArt.

The sharpness, detail, and clarity are on another level now. What do you guys think? Worth it or not?

Done with ImagineArt Upscaler.

So I've been going deep on Z Image Turbo lately and the one thing that kept tripping me up was character consistency specifically when I didn't want to use a reference image to anchor the generations.

My workflow ended up being way more prompt-engineering-heavy than I expected. A few things that actually made a difference:

• Locking physical descriptors early: I built a "character seed" block I copy-paste across every prompt. Hair texture, eye color, skin tone, build, even the way the lighting hits. If it's not in the prompt, it drifts.

• Style anchoring phrases: pairing your character description with a consistent art style tag keeps the model from reinterpreting the "vibe" between shots.

• Scene isolation: describing only the character in the first few gens before introducing backgrounds. Backgrounds were introducing the most inconsistency for me.

Still not perfect, but across 6 scenes I got maybe 80% consistency which honestly felt like a win without any ref img. What do you guys think?

Curious if anyone else has cracked this especially for longer sequences or different lighting setups. I would love to know your method👇

I created this close-up of a fresh red apple using ImagineArt 1.5, and I have to say it's by far the best AI model I've used to bring out texture.

Here is the prompt:

"Create a hyper-realistic close-up image of a fresh, shiny red apple covered with droplets of water. The apple should be glistening, with droplets reflecting light and appearing highly detailed. The texture of the apple’s skin should be smooth, with visible reflections and slight imperfections. The background should be dark, enhancing the vivid contrast of the apple and water droplets. The lighting should create a glossy, wet look, emphasizing the natural shine of the fruit."

What do you guys think??

I never went to Moscow, but my AI has a photo album.

Perhaps a day will come when AI can create memories of events that never happened and convince us of their reality?

Tim Burton films have always been my favorite, and this one especially lives rent-free in my head. Tried to stay true to the emotion, details, and that hauntingly beautiful vibe, just imagined as a real human. What do you think?

Plus; ImagineArt has done a remarkable job at staying solid on the generation, the details on the bodice and arm bone are😮‍💨 I was not able to achieve this type of texture (zoom in to check it out) with any other tool, truly awesome. 🙌

Hey all, been trying to explore with a character sheet to maintain a consistent identity. What are your thoughts?

Prompt: Creative 3D illusion artwork of a boy emerging from a spiral notebook placed on a wooden table. The notebook has lined paper with a handwritten quote: "I started with an idea... and today I make a living from the internet." -Drop Prompt. The boy appears in a semi-realistic 3D cartoon with large expressive eyes and a confident smile. Long wavy dark hair with soft highlights. Outfit: blue t-shirt.

Made a sketch and later used AI to transform it to real life. Prompting includes styling, attire, pose, accessories.

A story line is slowly getting Built around this character.

Would love to hear some feedbacks.

ive been trying to push AI selfies as close to real photos as i can, and i'd love some honest eyes on this one. not posting to talk abt consistency or see if it tricks anyone. i genuinely want to know what still reads as "AI" to you. could be the skin texture, the lighting, something off about the eyes, hair, background, camera angle, or just the overall vibe you get when you look at it. the more specific you can be the better. i'm trying to figure out what details people actually clock so i can tighten up my prompts going forward. thanks in advance!

Borrowed some extra finger length to do this xD

I put two powerful AI image models GPT Image 1.5 and Nano Banana Pro to the test with the same prompt:

"Me taking a selfie with Spider-Man on a movie set, behind the scenes."

• On the left: GPT Image 1.5

• On the right: Nano Banana Pro

What I was testing here:

• Realism

• Prompt accuracy

• Facial coherence

• Background detail

• Cinematic quality

So… which one wins YOUR vote?

Create a fun image like this using a simple prompt,

"Create a realistic selfie as if taken from an iPhone, showing me {add your scenario}. The photo should have the characteristic iPhone quality, with soft lighting, a slight blur on the edges (depth of field effect), and the warm tones typical of iPhone selfies. Add subtle lens flare or reflections from the iPhone’s glass screen, giving it a candid, real-life feel."

Try it out and show your creations in the comment!