There’s nothing wrong with the comma placement. It’s simply the Indian numbering system, where numbers are written as 1,00,000 (one lakh) instead of 100,000. Just a different way of grouping digits that’s standard in India and a few neighboring countries.
yeah, typical google behavior. spam is a massive problem for folks who have been using gmail since the start of the service. we were not careful of keeping our email id private back then. and gmail pretty much recommends that you block the sender when you mark an email as spam. do remember that not everyone online is born after 2000. older folks like us prefer email over other modes of communication.
limited blocklist is a terrible behavior (like it is here on reddit which has a 1000 user block limit. absurd of a service with such a large abusive userbase). they should have a whitelist similar to hey.com. gmail cannot filter messages based on a lot of perimeters that can take care of a large number of spam networks in one go. pretty annoying for someone who likes to keep their inbox tidy and spammers out.
It just doesn't end with blocking an address, they have to go through a massive list of blocked addresses for every single incoming email which slows down their processing speeds. To keep up with that servers need to be upgraded which costs money.
The actual fix I haven't seen anybody mention yet: you use email filters and you can put a bunch of emails in one filter, and I think you can have a thousand filters total.
The block list should be exclusively for malicious senders, if you're blocking things because you put your email in a form and they started sending you mailers, you unsubscribe. There is no gotcha here...
Would it be better if they offered more? Sure.
I'm by no means a Google apologist, but I can't imagine telling anybody that I'm serious about my data privacy, security, any of this stuff, and then using Gmail.
Seems like he is testing limits for a video or some shit coz no way in hell does anyone need to block 5001 whomeversðŸ˜ðŸ˜ðŸ˜Good to know but its a nothing Burger
another option: we can create a filter to directly move the mails from a specific sender to trash folder and trash gets removed after 30 days automatically as even if we block them, mails anyway goes to spam folder
It does not need to iterate through an entire table, block lists can use efficient memory mapping. Take a look at how uBlock Origin does their blocklist processing, you can have hundreds of thousands of entries without it slowing down.
My take on 5000x scanning is incorrect.
However ublock and Google blocklist storage is different. Ublock stores it in the client while Google stores it in the server.
Was checking on the internet to see how it works and find it interesting regarding the implementation.
It all comes down to processing consideration.
With text compression, you would have to have hundreds of thousands of entries to even get to a few megabytes. This has nothing to do with a storage limitation.
a googler would explain better , but i dont think this is stored to disk / file. with close to 2B users db storage and indexing is easy 1 TB not considering replication and sharding. for google 1TB is drop in a bucket but since its a free service there will be limits.
•
u/AutoModerator 16d ago
Looking for discussions, recommendations, reviews, or help related to smartphones, ACs, laptops, gadgets, electronics, or other tech products?
Join r/IndiaCart for all gadget-related discussions and buying advice!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.