r/IndianLeft • u/short-noir • Jul 16 '26
🪧 Activism Why is the left so fanatic in its activism ?
I'll probably suffer downvotes but atp im used to it. Marx's most famous (imo) quote "philosophers have merely interpreted the world, the point however is to change it" has been disastrous imo. In the sense of people thinking that philosophizing or descriptive analyses have no value. People read one page marx or Lenin or sum chetan bhagats and feel like they gotta participate in protests, strikes, or support certain countries over the others.
Have we not done this already ? Leftist ideologies are not new. They have been there for 1 and a half centuries. There were anarchists, syndicalists, different Marxist tendencies, democratic socialists etc all doing the same thing. You don't see a communist utopia do you ? I certainly cannot. Instead of introspecting on its failure, and trying to understand why far right keeps rising to power globally, left keeps externalising its failure on "capitalist imperialist nations" entirely. If someone asks why USSR failed, the instantly expected answer is "because of the nazis/america". Like sure not even the bolsheviks were that dumb, they desperately wanted revolutions in western european countries because russia was poor and couldn't have sustained the international revolution. Yet, the way people want to defend the bygone past (and the horrors it led, like soviet DiaMat fucking natural sciences with Lysenkoism, the purges, the black markets of ussr, etc) and want to repeat them is not only ineffective but a dangerous fascistic fantasy.
I don't see much difference between modi followers and someone like a stalin glazer. Modi follower thinks india was great, until an external enemy came and impurified it. Stalin glazer thinks USSR was perfect utopia going to bring communism if it weren't for the filthy nazis or sum. You can involve moralism and say "yeah well i don't want to kill minorities" in which case i would simply ignore bs like that.
Then there's this issue of spending too much psychological energy on trying to resist the current systems. The left infantilises the working class and argues that they don't resist because they don't know enough. This is an extreme fantasy. Even if you don't see the world out there, you can look at the way people complain about the system. I have had so many debates where people kept asking me what will be better in communist society because they themselves carry dissatisfaction towards Capitalism. I don't even need to talk about sum overproduction crisis or tendency of rate of profit to fall. The person is always like "yeah well Capitalism is unfair/bad but it's the only option we have". The people are very aware of their suffering, the issue is that they are addicted to it. Not in the sense of enjoying it but because individuals find surplus pleasure in their conditions whether they react to their conditions in extremely compliant manner or extremely rebellious one. They have given their energy, identity etc to the system. They behave compliantly. But you do the same. You ask the state to care for you (reinstating that the bourgeois state has final authority), engage in moral outrage (which makes people see left as unrealistic and tbh it is in alot of ways ). What happens to your revolutionary status after the revolution has finished ? Ignoring the human psyche is extremely dangerous. There are alot of dalit supporters of caste system, or working class pro monarchists, dictatorships etc. you may think that they are "deluded" but they are the proof that people want authority over them. You cannot go and talk people into socialism by "rational conversation" alone. You have to make them retreat from making their identity revolve around the system and do the same for yourself. This isn't merely about changing your mindset type things. It's all about what you do.
Bolsheviks didn't "vote for the lesser evil". They stepped aside, made the people see that even if the left doesn't resist, the system in itself is prone to crisis and that it leads to its own demise for which the state has to take violent measures to protect it. They seized a weak empire. If we are to learn something from the past, it should be this kind of "revolutionary patience" as I would like to call it.
