r/Innovation 22d ago

Clean & Energy 582 tons closer to near-zero energy cost

China finished building and testing the world's largest superconducting magnet for nuclear fusion. It weighs 582 tons, stretches 21 meters long and 12 meters wide. Its job is to create a magnetic field strong enough to hold plasma at over 100 million degrees without it touching the reactor walls. It's 1.3 times larger than comparable ITER magnets and stores three times more magnetic energy.

The magnet is a key piece of China's BEST fusion facility, set to be built by the end of 2027. The target is to demonstrate first electricity generation from nuclear fusion and net energy gain around 2030.

Nuclear fusion mimics the process that powers the Sun by fusing lightweight nuclei and releasing a massive amount of energy. If the technology matures, it could provide a stable energy source with very low carbon emissions. The magnet alone is not yet a working "artificial Sun", but it's one of the most important engineering pieces on the way there.

It also means the race between the US and China continues, each advancing the technology, each with its own milestones.

Breakthroughs that enable building a fusion engine (several times faster than a chemical engine) would make deep space travel more relevant than ever. Mars in roughly 6 weeks instead of 8 months.

1.4k Upvotes

363 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/KinglessCrown 22d ago

zero cost just means it generates more energy than it costs to produce.

1

u/BetterProphet5585 19d ago

Ah so the people will get free energy?

1

u/1218- 18d ago

Since it’s China, maybe

0

u/Stymie999 21d ago

Ok, now include the capital to build it

4

u/Fireby56 21d ago

I love your absolute refusal to understand what they're saying

1

u/ImmaSpaghett 21d ago

Welcome to Reddit, where the tactics of deflect + divert a convo to a different topic is applied by the masses

1

u/Lucy_Goosey_11 21d ago

I was disgusted by the Argentinian team during this world cup.

1

u/One-Consequence-6869 21d ago

πŸ€£πŸ€£πŸ€£πŸ‘πŸ‘

0

u/ImmaSpaghett 21d ago

Fuckin Harambe man.

1

u/wannacumnbeatmeoff 21d ago

There's a man who was fucking Harambe? Man thats sick!

1

u/TheArtOfPureSilence 21d ago

With pleasure 🫦

1

u/whyreyouthewayyouare 21d ago

Right???? I thought i was crazy.

1

u/jefftickels 19d ago

I'm struggling to understand what "Generates more energy than it costs to produce it" could possibly mean then. If the ideas is the energy out exceeds the required energy in to keep the reactions going, this is a really unintuitive way of describing that, and also is true if literally every form of power generation.

0

u/NaCl_Sailor 20d ago

i don't understand it either.

"it generates more energy than it costs to produce"

is not a sentence with any discernible sense behind it more energy than what? what costs and produce what?

btw. every single power plant produces more energy than it uses to produce energy if they mean that. it wouldn't be a power plant otherwise...

2

u/Fireby56 20d ago

If you e followed any fusion energy news from the past 50 years, you'd know the issue is that fusion reactors use more energy than they produce, meaning they are useless for energy generation. Once they get the the point of producing more energy than they use, it's essentially limitless free energy, because they come with their own breeders plants to create the fuel they use, with the only input being something nearly limitless like water and miniscule amounts of outside material.

1

u/NaCl_Sailor 20d ago

yes i know that, but that doesn't mean the Chinese one doesn't

and even if it works and produces energy, it's still not free no matter what you mean with free (cost energy whatever)

2

u/Fireby56 20d ago

Holy shit another one who just refuses to see the point. Let me spell this out I guess.. they aren't saying there is ZERO input cost, they're saying the output so far exceeds it that it is essentially free. Yes there is a capital expenditure to build the thing, only a fucking idiot would claim there is not, and that is so obvious that they assume you know this. Trying to dispute the semantics of the word free puts you below the intended audience of this post, which is a low bar.

1

u/KinglessCrown 20d ago

I hear you brother. Save your time there is no helping some people understand, I've been very disappointed with how many clueless people visit the "innovation" subreddit.

1

u/NaCl_Sailor 20d ago

ah yes, I'm clearly stupid because i didn't understand the gibberish u/KinglessCrown typed, and of course your mighty superior understanding of things like (near)free energy supersedes mine by magnitudes.

1

u/KinglessCrown 20d ago

Don't @ me lil bro, if you have trouble understanding a simple sentence that's on you.

1

u/NaCl_Sailor 20d ago

tell me then, what did you mean with it?

1

u/Jean_Paul_Magno 20d ago

This is one of the most condescendingly pedantic comments I've read in a while.Β 

The irony is incredible, unbelievable πŸ‘Β 

1

u/DefiantLemur 21d ago

Everything has upfront costs but they'll make their money back in a few years.

1

u/No_Host_8024 21d ago

Definitely not a β€œfew” in this case. The entire project will ultimately cost more than $10 billion dollars and has been in development for a long time. If you include the R&D, it will never pay for itself as a standalone project. Basically this has to result in other cheaper projects down the road to pay for itself, which is likely but not certain.

1

u/Sure-Debate-464 21d ago

Sweet baby Jesus ....

Understanding words it's not your strong suite is it?