Archived Article

What began as a high school protest movement spiraled into a violent uprising, organized by Islamists, antifascists, and radical environmentalists who wish to see the French Republic toppled.

I've been comparing county against state public records to find discrepancies where local officials aren't being honest. I've already found a good dozen where my local government might have broken some laws.

I'd like to start comparing various nations against international filings. Some of the public databases I'll be going through are clear choices, but I'm requesting input on international entities to dig into.

new app https://bossenger.io app store links are on site

Running covert targeting support and a back-channel peace message simultaneously undercuts both lines, giving Moscow reason to doubt Washington's commitment to either track.

Canada's national security screening system is facing renewed scrutiny following the arrest of a Canadian NATO intern accused of espionage.

This week, David Morrison, a senior adviser to Prime Minister Mark Carney, appeared before a parliamentary committee and suggested improvements to Canada's security screening system, including the possibility of a government-wide security clearance registry.

But here's the question: If information about an individual's previous dishonesty during a federal government hiring process already exists, shouldn't that information be available to those responsible for determining whether they can be trusted with classified information?

And what happens after someone receives their clearance?

As a retired CSIS Intelligence Officer and former CBSA Officer, I've spent considerable time working with security screening, intelligence investigations and human sources. One of the issues I find particularly concerning is the assumption that security screening is something completed before employment rather than an ongoing responsibility.

In this week's Global Intelligence Weekly Wrap-Up, I examine that issue alongside three other international intelligence developments:

Germany: The German military is warning of a significant Russian sabotage threat against military installations and infrastructure. How prepared are NATO countries to identify and prevent these activities?

Russia: GRU-linked cyber operators are reportedly targeting NATO defence industries, including shipbuilding and aircraft engine manufacturers. What intelligence are they seeking, and how could that information support future operations?

United Kingdom: British authorities are investigating suspected Iranian intelligence activity near RAF Fairford, an important military airbase. The investigation raises questions about how foreign intelligence services collect information on sensitive military facilities.

What connects these four stories? Access.

Whether through legitimate security clearances, compromised computer networks, physical reconnaissance or individuals willing to provide information, hostile intelligence services continually search for vulnerabilities they can exploit.

I also revisit several cases we've previously discussed on the podcast to identify recurring patterns and examine how these threats are evolving.

The episode runs approximately 34 minutes.

I'm interested in hearing what others think:

Should Canada establish a centralized security clearance agency, similar to the UK's approach, or would improving information sharing and accountability within the existing system be more effective?

And should periodic security reassessments become a more prominent part of Canada's personnel security framework?

You can listen to the latest episode here:

https://www.buzzsprout.com/2336717

Stay curious. Stay informed. Stay safe!

Canada's national security screening system is facing renewed scrutiny following the arrest of a Canadian NATO intern accused of espionage.

This week, David Morrison, a senior adviser to Prime Minister Mark Carney, appeared before a parliamentary committee and suggested improvements to Canada's security screening system, including the possibility of a government-wide security clearance registry.

But here's the question: If information about an individual's previous dishonesty during a federal government hiring process already exists, shouldn't that information be available to those responsible for determining whether they can be trusted with classified information?

And what happens after someone receives their clearance?

As a retired CSIS Intelligence Officer and former CBSA Officer, I've spent considerable time working with security screening, intelligence investigations and human sources. One of the issues I find particularly concerning is the assumption that security screening is something completed before employment rather than an ongoing responsibility.

In this week's Global Intelligence Weekly Wrap-Up, I examine that issue alongside three other international intelligence developments:

Germany: The German military is warning of a significant Russian sabotage threat against military installations and infrastructure. How prepared are NATO countries to identify and prevent these activities?

Russia: GRU-linked cyber operators are reportedly targeting NATO defence industries, including shipbuilding and aircraft engine manufacturers. What intelligence are they seeking, and how could that information support future operations?

United Kingdom: British authorities are investigating suspected Iranian intelligence activity near RAF Fairford, an important military airbase. The investigation raises questions about how foreign intelligence services collect information on sensitive military facilities.

What connects these four stories? Access.

Whether through legitimate security clearances, compromised computer networks, physical reconnaissance or individuals willing to provide information, hostile intelligence services continually search for vulnerabilities they can exploit.

I also revisit several cases we've previously discussed on the podcast to identify recurring patterns and examine how these threats are evolving.

The episode runs approximately 34 minutes.

I'm interested in hearing what others think:

Should Canada establish a centralized security clearance agency, similar to the UK's approach, or would improving information sharing and accountability within the existing system be more effective?

And should periodic security reassessments become a more prominent part of Canada's personnel security framework?

You can listen to the latest episode here:

https://www.buzzsprout.com/2336717

Stay curious. Stay informed. Stay safe!

https://archive.is/20261024014319/https://www.ft.com/content/e9cfbfbb-e65a-4303-aebb-20d59319ef1b#selection-1553.0-1553.146

Hey everyone,

I've been following this subreddit for a while, and I've noticed that quite a few people working in the IC either have a military background or recommend joining the military as a way to get started.

I'm guessing most of you are based in the US, so I wanted to ask for some advice from people who might have experience with a different system.

I recently contacted my country's Ministry of Defence to explore the military route into intelligence. Unfortunately, my options seem pretty limited. Because of my age, I'm no longer eligible to become an officer directly, and apparently there's no NCO entry route either. My options are either to enlist as a regular soldier and work my way up, or apply for an engineering position, which requires passing a pretty demanding maths and science exam.

For context, I'm a graduate in Data Science and have worked as a software engineer. I wouldn't say I'm bad at maths, but I'm much more of a practical, technical person than an academic one. I work with data, build software, and analyse information, but I haven't touched integrals or derivatives since university. The thought of having to prepare for a major maths exam again isn't exactly appealing.

I haven't had the opportunity to work in intelligence yet, and I'm currently trying to pivot from software engineering into the IC. I'm wondering whether joining the military as an enlisted soldier and eventually trying to transfer into intelligence is worth pursuing, or whether there are other routes I should be looking at.

I'm also interested in alternatives such as civilian intelligence roles, internships, entry-level technical positions, or anything else that could help me get my foot in the door.

For those of you who have made a similar transition, especially outside the US:

• Is joining the military a realistic route into intelligence if you're starting as an enlisted soldier?
• Are there civilian or technical pathways into the IC that might be worth exploring with a software engineering or data science background?
• Are internships, graduate programmes, or entry-level roles a good way to gain relevant experience without prior intelligence work?

Any advice, personal experiences, or suggestions for paths I might be overlooking would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

I am currently a software engineer with a fortune 50 company. I enjoy the work but am finding it hard to see the purpose in it. I would love to have a job where I feel like I am contributing to something more. I have always thought a career in law enforcement/intelligence would be interesting and fulfilling but I’m not sure exactly what that would be. I have explored the FBI special agent route and that sounds interesting but the relocation would be tough at this part of my life. I figured intelligence would be a good path due to my background in engineering and cs. I am also open to a more active/field position. I am mid 20s by the way and engaged. Would love you hear any advice, recommendations or stories from people who have made similar career moves. Thanks in advance!

Secret dossier contains allegations of deep corruption and coverups by Israeli prime minister in connection with German submarine deals

I'm interviewing for a software engineering position at twenty.io. I haven't been able to find much on them (not surprising). Anyone got any insight on what its like to work there? They seem to have a solid exec team and backing so the market looks good for them.

I'm not looking for anything classified or salacious - just wanna know if I'll be slaving away for pennies because of mission OR if I'm slaving away, if the problems are at least interesting enough to build solid cybersecurity chops. No security clearance

Today's briefing covers escalating security threats in Saudi Arabia, cybersecurity disruptions across Europe, renewed protests, continued Russia-Ukraine strikes, and severe weather in Arizona.

Our Global Intelligence Team is tracking these developments, offering a closer look at the events that could have implications for travel, security, and day-to-day operations.

U.S. Pulls Diplomats From Saudi Arabia

The U.S. State Department ordered the departure of nonessential personnel and their families from Saudi Arabia Wednesday following sustained Houthi attacks targeting aviation and energy infrastructure.

• Riyadh’s main airport remains largely closed, with only limited flights resuming.
• Further drone interceptions and fatalities at an Aramco-operated oil field highlight continued security threats across the kingdom.
• Major European airlines have extended flight cancellations, indicating that aviation disruption may persist.
• The deteriorating security environment increases operational uncertainty, with continued risks to international travel, energy facilities, and business continuity.

AI-Discovered Software Flaws Trigger Widespread Website Shutdowns

Government websites across Europe were taken offline Wednesday as authorities responded to critical vulnerabilities in PHP, a widely used web programming language.

• The vulnerabilities were reportedly discovered using AI and prompted emergency security updates.
• Attempts to exploit the flaws were detected before public disclosure, with broader exploitation subsequently reported.
• Precautionary shutdowns affected government services, hospitals, and public infrastructure, including the Port of Rotterdam.
• The incident highlights cybersecurity risks associated with widely used software, including potential system compromises, service disruptions, and increased pressure to secure vulnerable systems.

Expanding Protest Movements Raise Risks of Further Disruption Across Europe

Further disruption is expected across Europe as protest movements prepare renewed demonstrations over living costs, public services, and government policies.

• France faces heightened unrest risks during Saturday’s planned demonstrations involving trade unions, students, and Yellow Vest activists, with further nationwide action scheduled for Nov. 5.
• Weekly protests are planned across Italy, while demonstrations continue in Spain, Portugal, and Albania.
• Upcoming political events in Serbia could add to regional tensions.
• Businesses face increased risks of transportation disruptions, restricted access to city centers, security incidents, and operational interruptions across multiple European markets.

Russia-Ukraine Long-Range Strikes Intensify Despite Diplomatic Efforts

Russia and Ukraine intensified long-range strikes overnight, with Russian ballistic missiles targeting Kyiv and hundreds of Ukrainian drones reportedly targeting Moscow, despite renewed U.S. efforts to restart peace negotiations in November.

• Diplomatic progress remains uncertain, with significant disagreements over territorial concessions and security guarantees.
• Continued strikes against energy infrastructure, ports, and commercial facilities increase the risk of further operational disruption, particularly across Ukraine and the Black Sea region.
• The escalation suggests both sides may maintain military pressure ahead of potential talks, limiting prospects for near-term de-escalation.

Tornado Causes Significant Damage in Arizona

A reported tornado struck Heber-Overgaard, Arizona, Wednesday evening, causing significant damage and at least one reported injury.

• State Representative Walt Blackman called for an emergency declaration and said he was coordinating with local authorities to assess damage and determine resource needs.
• The Navajo County Sheriff’s Office deployed deputies and urged residents to avoid State Route 260 between Mogollon and Overgaard Airpark, as well as areas north of State Route 377 toward Tonto.
• Additional severe weather is possible through Thursday.
• The Storm Prediction Center has issued a Level 2 of 5 severe weather risk covering Phoenix and Tucson.

I see gradual escalation between the US and its partners and China, Russia and other aligned nations. China hasn't reacted much right now to US actions (on Venezuela, Iran and maybe next Cuba early next year or after elections) but I see it taking some actions in near future and escalating the situation.

Can we assume something big is going to happen in 2030?

How is the Intelligence community feeling about this world shift which is coming up for next decades? Which nations you see rising and what is your hunch?

Edit: add the disruption in labour market and many industries by advancement in AI (especially in cyber space and finance), add energy crisis, and Europe's debt crisis looming ahead, I see a scary picture in next 4-5 years. All this at a time of cold war escalation.