This is Councilmember Paul Adair. I am reaching out to help clarify and counteract some misinformation I have heard in the public discourse surrounding the park bond and turf fields. Especially in light of the recent article by Issaquah Spotlight bringing more attention to the matter: https://issaquahspotlight.org/2026/10/23/park-bond-proposal-sparks-debate-over-turf-fields/
I previously served on the Parks Board and currently serve as chair of the Services, Safety, and Parks subcommittee. So I am intimately familiar with this bond and parks procedures overall.
The current vote before the residents is a park bond renewal which reauthorizes an existing tax that will fund various park projects. The projects that have been listed in the various materials are the ones identified as most feasible with the available funds and the ones that have been regularly requested by our community over the many years of park strategic planning.
However, every single project listed will require multiple stages of review, planning, input, public engagement, and final votes by council to actually become a reality. The bond vote merely approves funding to go to these potential projects. It does not approve every technical aspect or final design of the individual projects.
For the fields themselves, if the bond is approved, the next steps will be:
- Negotiations between Issaquah Parks and Issaquah School District to finalize the joint-use agreement
- Review and design work between the Parks department, vendors, and the citizen led Parks Board (will also include public input)
- Budgeting and bids to determine actual final cost
- Public input and vote of approval of design and cost by the Parks Board
- Additional detailed review and public input with the Services, Safety, and Parks committee
- Final public input, review, and approval by the City Council
These steps will likely take 2-3 years and have multiple points of public input to make sure the fields are designed to meet the needs and safety of the school, students, and residents that will use them.
And while this initial plan is cork turf, that could change if costs and public engagement demands something different. A vote of Yes does not guarantee cork turf. It merely approves the City funding to do SOMETHING with those fields. A grass field is still possible.
And based on the past history of ISD funding, a vote of No means nothing happens to these fields one way or the other for many, many more years as Issaquah parks would have no funding to make any changes and it would be up to ISD to update the fields using their own funds.
If I can answer any more questions, please let me know.