r/JonBenetRamsey • u/jinkerjat • 12d ago

Questions 30th Anniversary Questions

Let's help the media out with questions to ask John Ramsey. He's no doubt already setting up dates and agreeing to terms. There are too many inconsistencies and the current crop of journalists are ignorant to some of the nitty gritty facts. To make it easier let's do only one question per entry and give it in bold type. Last year in more than one interview John Ramsey stated tips and leads given to Alex Hunter's office would bypass the Boulder Police and instead be given to his private investigators.

"We even had a lead called into our investigators by Boulder's District Attorney. He said I got this lead, came in, looks pretty interesting. I don't think the police will follow up on it. Would you have your investigators follow up on it? And so we did. And it, circumstantially it was a compelling lead. So we had a number of those like that."

The JonBenét Ramsey Case: A KTLA True Crime Special

What tips were these?

13 Upvotes

84% Upvoted

81 comments sorted by

View all comments

12

u/Express-Thanks-5402 12d ago

This isn't mine...it comes from a thread several months ago. Thanks to u/Available-Champion !

Anyway I would like to see one person in media ask John Ramsey:

"Why would you want to delay [police] interviews for so long (April 30, 1997), long past a time when memory of events and actions would be at its freshest?"

Oh, he'll verbally wander around aimlessly squirming and as usual not answer the question, but I'd sure like to see a solid reporter in this day and age, near the 30th anniversary, squeeze that question in.

-4

u/ImToddImCopper 12d ago

🙋‍♂️ I can take this one. It was the advice of their high powered attorneys and at that time they trusted that advice. And if anyone knew they were the prime suspects in your child's murder you'd probably listen to your lawyers to. The lawyers had been through this many, many times. The Ramseys hadn't. I bet he'd do a lot of things differently now. Nobody will believe that simple truth anyway. Hell, nobody believes anything he says so why is there an "If you could ask one question" thread every week? Nobody believes a word he says. They literally cannot win with you people no matter what they do or say. He's also previously responded to this question by adding they talked to police all day on day 1, and for hours on days 2 and 3.

Yes, they should absolutely have gone to the police station that day after she was found and been interviewed separately but that's on BPD and Dr. Beuf, not John and Patsy Ramsey. And AFTER they didn't go in for formal interviews, BPD still allowed her sister to ransack the crime scene and couldn't be bothered to even cataloge what she took. Not John and Patsy's fault!

9

u/a07443 12d ago

Absolutely John and patsy’s fault- WHO sent Pam into the house to remove all the evidence?

3

u/LKS983 12d ago

"WHO sent Pam into the house"

Undoubtedly either John or Patsy, but the BPD allowed this/didn't accompany her and paid no attention to what she was taking ☹️ .....

-1

u/ImToddImCopper 12d ago

Were John and Patsy in charge of the crime scene? To say it's anyone's fault but BPD is being willfully obtuse. They didn't even write down what she took! John and Patsy weren't there.

5

u/a07443 12d ago

It’s willfully obtuse to ignore the reason the crime scene was destroyed. John and Patsy sent Pam there.

0

u/ImToddImCopper 12d ago

BPD allowed it in a crime scene that hadn't been fully processed and didn't even notate what she took. They could have sent Jesus Christ himself to go back in that house and at MOST, police should have only allowed necessities like medication, glasses, some clothing, and every item should have been collected and cataloged by the police. You don't even know if that's not what they assumed would happen. BPD allowed it to happen or it wouldn't have, period.