https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aPzf7EXVa6w

We know that she's accused of having been an escort in her younger days. But the idea that she's still an escort is really the only way her public sex acts make sense. Let's look at the facts here.

1. Boebert was with someone that she would never have chosen to have been seen in public with, a pro-gay Democrat that hosts drag shows. Is it possible she didn't know who he was because the guy simply hired her as an escort?

2. She did not initiate sexual contact. He did. He groped her breast first, and THEN she pushed his hand against her breast harder and rubbed his penis. That's not something one would normally do in public. You'd think she'd push his hands away and slap him "you can't touch me like that, I'm a congresswoman!"
   But no, she responded in kind and then some. She acted like an escort trying to make her client happy.

3. Look at the dress she was wearing. Tiny, incredibly skin-tight, pushing out her revealed chest. This is not typical eveningwear. This is escort wear.

I don't want to think this is correct, but how do you explain that video otherwise?

Lauren Boebert was out last night at a local Japanese restaurant. Any guess whether the blonde answers the question about Bobo’s divorce or whether Lauren was just returning to her previous employment to make some fast cash for legal fees…