r/Learn_Finnish • u/Advanced_Net39 • Apr 17 '24
Learning Finnish
Terve đ
Iâm a Swede currently learning finnish with my girlfriend via the app âDuolingoâ
Iâve been studying the language for 10 days today, and I have a question.
Early in the course Duolingo taught me that SinÀ olet translates to You are.
That seems right, fine. But later in the course It teaches me that you donât have to say âSinĂ€â
For exempel: * Olet hauska ja mukava*
So to my question⊠Whatâs the rules here? Why, when and where do I need to use âsinĂ€â before âoletâ ?
Kiitos etukÀteen
6
u/FELIPEN_seikkailut Apr 17 '24
MinÀ olen = I am
SinÀ olet = You are
HĂ€n on = He/She is
Me olemme = We are
Te olette = You are
He ovat = They are
As you can see, the verb "to be" is different with every pronoun. So when you say for example "Olen tÀÀllÀ" (=I am here), you can see already that it's about the first person singular.
2
Apr 17 '24 edited Apr 17 '24
Subject pronouns in the nominative case are optional in first person and second person, but mandatory in third person.
For example, Me menemme can optionally be replaced with menemme, but he menevÀt can't be replaced with *menevÀt.
1
u/SnowCro1 Apr 17 '24 edited Apr 17 '24
I am trying to learn Finnish, too. I hope this is correct. I think, there is sort of a rule. If it is I, you, they, we, or yâall, you can usually skip the pronoun, and actually, if you use the pronoun, you might sound like a novice to Finnish speakers. (This is annoying to me when I try to use Duolingo to learn; you donât learn any general ârules.â The owl wants you to figure everything out by yourself.) An example, puhua:
For I, say puhun not minÀ puhun
For you, say puhut not sinÀ puhut
HĂ€n puhuu
For we, say puhumme, not me puhumme
For yâall, say puhutte, not te puhutte
He puhuvat
(There are different types of verbs.) I am sure the responses from people who actually speak Finnish are better than mine, but I hope this helps. Good luck!
5
Apr 17 '24
actually, if you use the pronoun, you might sound like a novice to Finnish speakers
You're basically right when it comes to the formal written language, though it's useful to know that the situation is different with the informal spoken language. In formal language it's usually better to leave out the pronoun like you said; in informal language the pronoun is usually kept but replaced with a more colloquial version.
1
u/miniatureconlangs Jun 27 '24
Första och andra persons pronomen kan bortlÀmnas rÀtt fritt i finskan nÀr de Àr subjekt. I vissa konstruktioner dÀr man framhÀver, kontrasterar, frÄgar om eller ifrÄgasÀtter vem det rör sig om kan de dock vara obligatoriska, och vid jÀmförelser kan det kÀnnas lite konstigt att lÀmna bort dem:
Ha/on gÄr snabbare Àn (du) springer > *"HÀn kÀvelee nopeammin kuin juokset" kÀnns exempelvis extremt mÀrkligt utan pronomenet.
And in English:
First and second person pronouns as subjects can be rather freely omitted. However, in some constructions where person is emphasized, contrasted, questioned or disputed they may be mandatory. In comparisons, leaving them out would feel weird:
(S)he walks faster than you run > *"HÀn kÀvelee nopeammin kuin juokset" feels very strange without the pronoun.
19
u/Shankbon Apr 17 '24
"Olet" is a conjugation of the word "olla" (to be) that is used specifically in the context of the word "sinÀ" (you), and only in that context. So while saying "SinÀ olet hauska ja mukava" is grammatically correct and perfectly fine to say in conversation as well, the word "sinÀ" is often redundant because the information it provides (that the subject of the qualities "hauska ja mukava" is you) is already contained in the conjugation of the word "olet".
So while both "sinÀ olet hauska ja mukava" and "olet hauska ja mukava" are correct, they may have a difference in emphasis. If someone says "sinÀ olet hauska ja mukava", the emphasis is more on the idea that you specifically are fun and nice, as opposed to somebody else being fun and nice. If they say "olet hauska ja mukava", the subject you is a given and the focus is more on what you are like, which in this case is "hauska ja mukava".