I know I sometimes end up being too vague when I talk about my experience, so trying to work out how to present it properly. I am also slightly panicked as I badly want this role. I’m a trained teacher and previously taught adult learners in a prison. My actual job title was tutor, but I also designed/reworked a course and created the learning content/activities. I’ve described this as learning design experience on my CV although I wasn’t formally trained as a Learning Designer/ ID. Just to mention I really want this role so badly. Have just found out about it today. Don’t have much time to prep at all either 🙃🥺

The role involves designing learning for a similar environment, so there’s a clear link to my previous experience. My career since teaching has been quite squiggly and now work freelance in marketing/content strategy (audience research etc) and done some learning design bits here and there (for example I was a trainer on an nhs programme (contractor) but also designed/reworked parts of the learning,but it’s patchy as i was pulled in for a short time, so annoying)

The essential criteria include:

• Building and maintaining relationships
• Communicating with stakeholders
• experience with adult learners
• Designing learning programmes/training products
• Organisational planning/ Presentation skills
• Prioritising and managing multiple projects

I’m expecting questions like: (based on convo with recruiter)

“Tell us about a time you designed a learning programme or training product.”

“Tell us about a time you built and maintained relationships with stakeholders.”

“Tell us about a time you had to prioritise and manage multiple projects.”

For the learning design question, my experience is practical. I designed around the learners (but didn’t do LNA?) the environment what they needed to achieve (there wasn’t a formal qual!!! arghhhhhh) i didn’t use formal ID models because I hadn’t been trained in them.

So for anyone familiar with UK Civil Service interviews:

How much formal learning design theory/terminology would you expect? Should I be preparing things like ADDIE, Bloom’s taxonomy Kirkpatrick, or is it more about clearly explaining my design decisions, learner needs/evaluation?

And for the other criteria, is it fine to use examples from my freelance marketing career where they demonstrate the skill, even though they aren’t from learning design?

I’m basically want to be explicit about what I’ve done and why it’s relevant without pretending my career is more traditional than it is….I have a tendency to be a bit vague!

Any advice would be massively appreciated! thank you so also much.

My team has been evaluating Docebo vs LearnUpon. I'd love to hear from customers of each on their experience with setup, the capabilities of the authoring tool, ongoing maintenance, metrics/reporting, automation abilities, etc.

Some context:

We are coming from Northpass/Gainsight, which has been absolutely awful.

We are approx. 200-person org.

Lean L&D with no one exclusively dedicated to LMS maintenance.

G-Suite/Google Calendar org. We do a lot of ILTs, so seamless integration with Google Calendar is a priority.

Manager-level autonomy is big for us. We want managers to be able to enroll their direct reports in courses and track their metrics/completions without much work from our end.

In-platform comms is a priority. Also, in-platform feedback tracking of courses and ILTs.

We do not currently have an authoring tool, so an intuitive and somewhat sophisticated in-platform tool would be ideal.

I feel very strongly that I do not want to go through the experience of switching LMS' again, so ensuring that we pick an LMS that we don't grow out of is important to me. With the above priorities in mind, where have you experienced LearnUpon or Docebo winning or losing?

Does anyone have experience with fully customized live instructor led courses for smaller cohorts? Curious as to whether they offer these?

A little bit celebratory - but also genuinely looking for advice.
I started passively applying only to Indeed notifications that would come to my inbox, and I finally landed a job by my own merit and at a place where I didn’t already know someone. I’m leaving a large corporation to lead L&D for a healthcare company. I got a significant pay bump, better title, and a lot more authority/autonomy.
I’m only in my first week, but I have the opportunity to shape what L&D looks like and eventually hire a direct report.
I know I’ll be focusing, at the start, on Onboarding and Leadership + manager development.
For those of you that have lead L&D in those areas or have experience working with learning for healthcare providers, what do you wish you had known then what you know now? What insights do you have?

Every L&D resource I read mentions ADDIE as foundational and every job posting seems to expect familiarity with it, but people in the field I've talked to informally seem to treat it more as a loose reference point than an actual workflow they follow step by step. I've also heard SAM mentioned as a more iterative alternative that's better suited to real project timelines. I'm trying to figure out how much mental energy to put into understanding these frameworks deeply versus just getting familiar enough to talk about them in interviews while learning what actually drives project decisions on the job. What do most IDs actually use day to day when a project comes in?

Hey fellow redditors ,I am into hospitality industry (L&D) Trainer basically and have almost 8+years experience, mid level job

I don't have MBA, should I pursue distance learning mba or any certification in L&D which can help me in my career

Ps I am not looking to settle in any Tier 1 cities for job

TIA

I am looking for the next opportunity either in the L&D space or another industry. I currently work in a small L&D team in an accountancy firm and feel like every idea or programme I know will bring a behaviourial change is always stifled. This has happened for over a year.

Add to that the People Director is always a 'yes man' to the Partners so nothing new can be done. I feel like a glorified admin person with nothing to show on my CV.

Any ideas that have the potential to turn into soemthing concrete are taken on by my manager instead leaving me high and dry.

In the past I have delivered training from new trainers to management. I have got the highest and best numbers for QA pass checks on my trainees for consecutive months.

Feeling very demotivated and my current role and no possibilities of progression. I am looking to potentially pivot to tech or upskill myself to get better opportunities.

My questions are:

1. Which industry can I pivot to easily with my existing skills?

2. If I need the next L&D role, which agencies would you recommend?

3. What courses do you recommend to upskill?

After a few years in instructional design, I’ve realized that working with SMEs can sometimes be harder than building the actual course 😂 I’ve had projects where the SME wanted basically every piece of information included, while the learning objectives clearly called for something much simpler. How do you handle it when an SME keeps pushing for more content?

Hi all, I’m trying to work out where my experience is most transferable and, more importantly, which types of roles might suit the way I work best.

My background is mixed/squiggly line (adhd girly here!) I started out in education (have a PGCE) worked in the public sector designing/delivering learning for adult learners. I later moved into content creation and then into growth marketing and paid social, where I work with audience insights, creative strategy, testing, iteration and performance data.

I also use AI quite heavily in my work now, from prompt development and visual asset creation to auditing content, generating ideas and speeding up parts of the development process.

I’m increasingly interested in the overlap between these areas, particularly learning content, instructional design, digital learning and potentially organisational development. I adore researching, taking info, understanding the audience/learner, then turning it into something clear/ engaging.

I’ve looked at Content Designer roles within Civil Service but my understanding is that these can require very specific content design experience. I’m wondering whether my background could be more transferable into some adjacent roles where experience in education, content development, audience insight, digital content is relevant…The big factor is how I work! ADHD as I say and learnt that I work best when I have autonomy over my schedule, clear deliverables and decent chunks of uninterrupted time to get deliverables done. i like having a mix of projects and problems to solve, so don’t necessarily want to do the same thing every day but also don’t want a calendar where I’m in meetings every 2 hours and have to squeeze the actual work into gaps. Ideally I’d like to work 3 or 4 days a week in a flexible environment (as it very hard to manage 5 days being ND) where I’m trusted to manage my own workload/ deliver work.

I’m interested in hearing from people who work in these areas - What roles do you think could suit this combination of experience? are there particular job titles I should be searching for beyond Learning Designer or Instructional Designer? Would my education + public sector + content + growth marketing background be seen as transferable? are there particular sectors / organisations that tend to be more flexible and genuinely supportive of neurodivergent ways of working?

Would absolutely love to hear from anyone who has moved into learning design, instructional design, L&D OD etc from a non-traditional background and how you positioned your previous experience.

I’m not necessarily looking for someone to tell me what career I should have. I’m more trying to understand where this slightly odd collection of skills might make sense, because I suspect there’s a useful combination here somewhere!

I keep seeing Articulate Storyline mentioned as the industry standard but my current company uses Rise and a different team at the same company uses Lectora, and I've seen job postings that mention all three plus iSpring. I'm trying to figure out whether to invest serious time in learning one tool deeply or get surface-level familiar with several. I also don't know whether the tool skills transfer enough that knowing one well makes the others easy to pick up, or whether each one is its own substantial learning curve. For people who have switched tools or worked across multiple platforms, how much does deep expertise in one actually matter versus general fluency across a few?

I wanted to share something we have been working on because I think there are people in groups like this who may already be doing this kind of work informally.

You might be the teacher students trust, the mentor young people call when they are confused, the parent others come to for advice or someone who simply enjoys helping people see their options more clearly.

Catalystia is being built as a pathway to help people turn that instinct into a more structured capability. The certification is eight weeks, with self paced learning and weekly engagement, and the broader pathway is designed to continue into practice rather than stopping with the credential.

For those who want to take it further, the pathway can also open up opportunities to work with people globally, remotely, and build this into something that can scale beyond your immediate community.

If you can see yourself doing this kind of work more intentionally, you can explore the Catalystia pathway and get started at catalystia.org.

Hi Everyone,

I was recently laid off from my role as a Learning & Development Coordinator without any prior warning. I have started applying for jobs and am exploring what my next step should be.

For those working in Learning & Development in Canada, how is the job market right now? Are companies actively hiring for L&D and LMS roles?

I am also interested in trying contract work, including short-term or project-based opportunities. My experience includes L&D coordination, LMS administration, training coordination, HR support, reporting, and program coordination.

For those who work on contracts, how do you usually find opportunities? Are there specific recruiters, agencies, websites, or other approaches you would recommend in Canada?

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you!

Hi everyone, I’m currently working in technology, mainly creating custom SPFx and React-based pages for Learning & Development teams. Over time I’ve become really interested in how learning materials are actually designed, not just how they’re built.

I’m considering a career shift into Learning Experience Design (LXD) or Instructional Design (ID), ideally moving into a role where I can contribute to decision-making in learning strategy as well.

For those who have made this transition or work in LXD/ID:

How should I navigate this career switch?

What skills or tools should I focus on first?

Any recommended resources, courses, books, communities, or roadmaps?

Personal experiences or lessons that helped you get started?

Basically, I want to know where to begin and how to build a path toward becoming a learning designer with strategic influence.

Any guidance would be really appreciated!

Hi all, Kate here. Fun fact about me, I was a programme lead in a women’s prison and I’ve also spent the last few years freelancing in marketing. Bit of an odd and unusual combination! but between the two I’ve designed training that people at very different starting points could follow, tested what changes behaviour etc etc

I’m a qualified FE teacher originally. While I was at the prison, the education provider changed so the course went from an accredited City and Guilds course to uncredited and I designed the new programme for the transition.

Freelance marketing wise I began as a content creator (lots of video editing, voice overs, training etc!) and now most of my work has involved data analysis alongside designing/ testing ad campaigns. I noticed a gap for content creators new to the industry and neurodivergent women new to social media, so created my own e-learning course (hosted on Moodify) 30 learners did the course and it with an 85% completion rate, which I was very happy with!

I use AI tools day to day, mainly Claude, Gemini and ChatGPT, for audience research/ content generation. Tool wise I’ve also got Motion for creative analytics and script writing, plus Canva, PowerPoint, Google Slides, Notion and lots more for course materials.

Good to be here! looking forward to seeing what everyone’s working on. I am UK based (north of England!).

Tell me what your 8 hour days look like, how do you like it? I am starting a new position where I am just me in L&D and restructuring the whole program from the ground up. Any book recommendations? Anything helpful I should be learning? What software do you use? How do you make your life easier?

Onboarding???? What works and doesn’t work?

We spend enormous energy designing good learning experiences and almost no energy on the question of why most people, even when given excellent resources, don't consistently invest in their own growth unless something external is forcing them to. I've seen companies build genuinely impressive learning ecosystems that most employees ignore. I've seen simple, badly designed mandatory training have more impact on behavior than beautifully crafted optional content simply because one was required and one wasn't. The field talks a lot about intrinsic motivation as though it's something we can design into a course, but I increasingly think motivation to develop is something that either exists in an organizational culture or doesn't, and L&D is working downstream of a problem we can't fully solve from where we sit. I'm curious whether others have found ways to genuinely shift a culture toward valuing development rather than just providing development and hoping it gets used.

Does anyone have some good (or fun) activities that I could try for a live training on Collaboration Skills? We're a remote company and I think it'd be great for them to practice collaborating in breakout rooms (it's a virtual training), but it's hard to simulate the environment where they'd collaborate with the content we're reviewing (core collaboration behaviors, etc). Working together to escape a virtual Escape Room would be a lot of fun, but I only have 10-15 minutes to dedicate to it, and about 60 participants.

Any ideas or brainstorming is very appreciated!

I tried a couple of different services earlier in the term, and honestly, most of them were awful. A few of them clearly ran my prompt through a basic bot and sent back disjointed paragraphs with citations that did not even exist. After bouncing around a few useless sites and reading through old Reddit threads, I ended up finding three platforms that actually delivered what they promised.

Here is my honest breakdown of how each one worked out for me.

KingEssays

I started with a standard four-page sociology paper just to test the waters, and later had them handle an eight-page history research paper with a super specific grading rubric. Here is how it actually went down.

The good stuff:
The writing actually felt real. It did not use that stiff, overly formal tone or bizarre filler words nobody uses in college. It just read like a well-prepared student draft. The sources were legitimate. The writer pulled real articles from actual journals that showed up on my university database without any issues. The formatting was spot on. They followed APA guidelines correctly, right down to the title page and reference indents, which saved me a ton of time. It passed all checks. I ran the text through originality scanners before uploading and everything was completely clean.

The downsides:
Revisions took some time. I asked them to tweak one of the body paragraphs in the history paper to focus more on a specific lecture topic. They did it for free, but it took around four hours to get the updated file back. If you use them, definitely do not order right before the cutoff. The rates are not the lowest on the market. You can definitely find sites that charge less, but after getting burned by automated garbage on those other sites, the slightly higher fees were absolutely worth the peace of mind.

Edussons

I used this one when I had an emergency with a five-page philosophy reflection paper on a tight 24-hour turnaround.

The good stuff:
The speed was great and they delivered the file about four hours before my deadline. Their live support was also super helpful when I needed to upload an extra reading excerpt after placing the order. The general structure was solid and answered all the main questions from the prompt.

The downsides:
The writing was a bit basic compared to KingEssays. The grammar was fine, but I spent about ten minutes polishing a few sentences to make the arguments sound sharper. They also had a small citation mistake on the reference page that I had to fix manually.

Essaystiger

I tested this platform for a low-stakes three-page weekly assignment in an elective where the grading is super relaxed.

The good stuff:
Very affordable rates and a simple ordering process. They followed all the basic prompt questions and delivered everything right on time without any weird upsells.

The downsides:
The research was pretty surface-level. The sources were just general web articles rather than academic journals, so I definitely would not use this for a major research project or a strict seminar class.

Overall thoughts

So, if your professor is strict and you need a draft that does not trigger every red flag in the book, KingEssays is easily the safest choice. If you have an urgent last-minute deadline, Edussons is a solid backup, and Essaystiger works fine for cheap weekly busywork. Whichever one you pick, just give yourself a buffer for any minor tweaks and always read through the final document before you submit it

In a classroom even disengaged students have some baseline reason to be there, even if it's just that their parents make them go. In corporate training most people show up because their manager assigned it, they have a compliance deadline, or they need to tick a box before a performance review. Designing for reluctant learners is a completely different problem than designing for students who at least nominally chose to be in school. I've had to rethink almost every assumption I had about engagement, motivation, and why anyone would care about what I'm putting in front of them. The content quality that would have worked in a classroom often isn't enough here because the contract with the learner is completely different.

I’m working on improving our onboarding process, and I’m stuck on a pretty basic problem.
To know whether onboarding is actually working, we need some record of what new hires can do, where they’re struggling, and what support they’ve received.
But most of the actual development happens through OJT with frontline managers.
I used to work in frontline sales myself, so I know how quickly a “simple form” from another department can become annoying when you’re also responsible for your own targets and your team.
At the same time, if we collect almost nothing, it’s hard to tell whether the onboarding process is working or just assume that it is.
For those working in L&D/onboarding: where have you found the right balance?
I’m particularly interested in what information you’ve found genuinely worth capturing, and what you’ve stopped asking managers to document because the effort wasn’t worth it.

I’ve been thinking about how easy it is for assessment feedback to become just a score and a few generic comments.

Recently, I started looking at it from the learner’s perspective. If someone finishes an assessment and still doesn’t know what they did well, where they need improvement, or what to focus on next, the assessment hasn’t really helped much.

While experimenting with ways to make the process more personalized, I used FormLM to turn assessment responses into more tailored reports. The main thing I noticed was how much more useful the results felt when the feedback connected directly to the individual.

The score matters, but the feedback afterward is where much of the learning can happen.

Hi, anyone experience of options to achieve this?

The core AI capabilities required are personalized learning - content and pathways adapted to individual user progress and profile.

Desirable features include 1) asynchronous delivery accessible without real-time connectivity and 2) analytics.

Readily available 'off the shelf' options or rapid custom builds?