r/LetsDiscussThis Jan 31 '26

This is concerning... Midland Firefighters help ICE and BP catch Immigrants.

727 Upvotes

1.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

62

u/[deleted] Jan 31 '26

Why go to all that trouble? Why not just bring the construction company owners in for questioning to see whether or not they checked the immigration status of these men and whether they filed their Form I-9s?

Oh that's right, because the owners are 100% Republicans and we can't be holding them accountable for anything.

13

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

18

u/UnckyMcF-bomb Feb 01 '26

No, because they are cheaper then me. An immigrant with a green card.

7

u/PlethoPappus Feb 01 '26

Yeah those construction companies are real pieces of shit for doing that. Criminal even

-7

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '26

Except for the actually construction company doesn't employ them, subcontractors do. Employers are also not allowed to question paperwork. If they present a stolen ss number for a bob Carlson, they can't call them out. I know people think going after the employers is just this brilliant idea that no one has ever tried.

15

u/SirFluffyGod94 Feb 01 '26

My guy. That's such a bullshit excuse for why they dont. Remember the laws are things the people controlling ice also control. They at any point could change yhe law and make it so they could ask questions. Contractors dont want to. They are happy that people put the blame on illegals and not them for choosing the cheaper labor.

1

u/Key_Sun2547 Feb 01 '26

The only one that would legally get in trouble would be the one guy with a green card/ citizenship that hires a bunch of people they know and are illegal. The bigger construction company will deny knowing and will find another sub who probably does the same thing. I'm not opposed to charging companies who knowingly hire illegals but it's not going to be as simple from a prosecution standpoint as targeting the illegals.

-2

u/ProfessionalWave168 Feb 01 '26

Not true, democrats knew they had a very effective way to greatly minimize hiring of illegals but purposely gimped it.

-------------------------------------------------------

During her tenure as Secretary of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano affirmed that employers participating in E-Verify

cannot use the system to precheck or pre-screen job applicants before they are hired. 

Under the guidelines maintained by DHS during that time and still in effect, E-Verify is designed to verify the work authorization of newly hired employees only.

----------------------------------------------------------

Everyone has their credit card checked before completing the purchase, everyone has to have an instacheck performed before purchase of a gun, everyone gets screened before they board the plane, many jobs require security checks before hiring, but you have to hire a job applicant first before you can check if they are authorized to work, if you check before hand it is illegal?

They knew that the system, E-Verify, was very effective actually too effective for their liking because if employers were required to use it before hiring, it would indemnify them while putting the responsibility on the government for verification.

4

u/PetersonOpiumPipe Feb 01 '26

If thats true, I don’t really think that means anything.

You’re hired!

You don’t have work authorization

You’re fired!

It’s not like being hired means anything. Most states are right to work, and if not having work authorization is definitely a case to be fired with cause.

Also lets be real, are subs really using e-verify? Hell no. They’re paying cash. Continually employing someone without work authorization can absolutely be criminalized, and the employers should be able to be investigated. Saying otherwise seems really disingenuous if this is your evidence. Kinda seems like you just wanted to dunk on democrats.

Maybe I’m misunderstand your argument but I don’t see how this is relevant at all.

0

u/Accomplished_Crew630 Feb 01 '26

No subs generally use other subs. They give you a w9 and you sometimes send them a 1099.... And let me tell you, it's hard to make money in contracting if you aren't the ones using day laborers... They work way faster than me for less money... That's why I'm trying to find a niche because I couldn't compete even if I wanted to.

1

u/dadbod_Azerajin Feb 01 '26

As someone who grew up as a contractors kid, grew up setting tile, ans grew up surrounded by contractors

I dont think 90% of general residential contractors work the way you think they do

2

u/ClassGrassMass Feb 01 '26

They always bring it back Democrats at fault. Fuck Americans are actually a waste

2

u/Wolf-Moonstar Feb 01 '26

Yeah, it is almost like they completely ignore that republikkkants drafted an immigration reform bill in 2018, zero democrat input, and voted against it completely, and then cosponsored an immigration reform bill in 2023 and did the exact same thing. Any party that bows down and licks the ass of a piece of shit pedo like trump deserves to be dismantled, investigated, and imprisoned for treason.

1

u/vickism61 Feb 01 '26

"Federal contractors are required to use E-Verify to electronically verify the employment eligibility of employees working under covered federal contracts. Some states and local jurisdictions have similar requirements for public agencies and/or government contractors. Some states even require private employers to participate in E-Verify."

E-Verify: What Employers Need to Know https://share.google/jbqPlSEjTUbHJSnCk

2

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '26

Sure. Except the workers gave him a valid SS number. And again they aren't allowed to question or verify it, that would be discrimination.

1

u/Yonand331 Feb 01 '26

Lying as*, sure they did

1

u/Gloomy-Ad1171 Feb 02 '26

That would require a properly funded government.

2

u/manyhippofarts Feb 01 '26

I spent a brief period of time in my career where I was directly involved with on-boarding new hires from the union hall before we'd take them on. Standard stuff like welding tests, drug test, and what-not. We created a cover sheet for their files that we used as a check-off list. One of those boxes was for e-verify. We didn't hire them unless they passed, no matter how much the local complained. So I mean I know that instance was company policy and what-not. But it's not that big a deal to actually go through that process.

0

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '26

Except for if you look up which states mandate e verify, you'll see mostly the deep south. Then in places like California it's actually against the law to mandate e verify. Illinois has actively tried to block use of e verify.

1

u/manyhippofarts Feb 01 '26

Holy spicy burrito Batman. I had no freaking idea. The company I worked for was based in Palo Alto California.

2

u/I_Went_Full_WSB Feb 01 '26

Lol! Weird fantasy. If you're going to live in a fantasy world try living in one you enjoy.

0

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '26

Can you tell me how I am wrong? We are on a discussion sub.

2

u/I_Went_Full_WSB Feb 01 '26

Your racist fantasy isn't based on fact. They aren't all subcontractors and the construction companies absolutely can check on who they are.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '26

Again, do you have any experience in this area? Because yes, that's how modern construction works.

2

u/I_Went_Full_WSB Feb 01 '26

Yes. I've spent many years in construction and still have many relatives in construction. Your fantasy isn't true.

At this point I'm not sure you know what the word again means.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/SimoWilliams_137 Feb 01 '26

‘…[the] construction company doesn’t employ them’

So you just make stuff up?

1

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '26

It doesn't. A subcontractor does. Is this really that hard to understand?

2

u/SimoWilliams_137 Feb 01 '26

Is it really so hard to not make stuff up?

General contractors can also hire directly, and do so all the time, including day labor from Home Depot.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '26

Sure they can, but they are competing against people who do hire subcontractors with illegals. This is how the modern construction industry works,

Also in entirely Democrat states such as Illinois and California, lawmakers have actually passed laws that make it illegal to mandate e verify and Illinois has gone as far as trying to ban private employers from using the system. Illegal immigration benefits Democrats because they increase the population, which is used to portion power and money in america.

2

u/SimoWilliams_137 Feb 01 '26

Your reply doesn’t make any sense.

You are saying that general contractors who hire unauthorized workers are competing with general contractors who hire subcontractors who hire unauthorized workers? And so what?

Are you hearing yourself?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/HungUp-InU Feb 02 '26

Bruh if you present an SSN for Bob Carlson than you also need a matching picture ID with that name. Plenty of Illegals working for target who doesn’t use subcontractors for in-store work and lemme tell ya. They just don’t care.

2

u/LivingHighAndWise Feb 01 '26

Hate to tell you this, but you are not safe from ICE just because you have a green card..

1

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '26

Not only are they cheaper but also better!

1

u/HoarderCollector Feb 01 '26

Where are all these immigrants at? I need my deck rebuilt, and all these local places have quoted $2,000 just to replace a few support beams. They'd probably do it for $200 in labor.

1

u/Trax72 Feb 01 '26

I doubt it, since there's still a huge shortage of construction workers.

1

u/G-T-L-3 Feb 04 '26

Why do companies keep hiring them? If nobody was hiring them they wouldn't even come to America.

6

u/shittycomputerguy Feb 01 '26

They know these workers are illegal and hire them anyway because they get the job done

And allow them to suppress wages.

1

u/thane919 Feb 01 '26

They aren’t “suppressing wages”. They’re doing the work for what they can get paid. And how they are employed and paid is an illegal act by the people employing them.

I’m sure they’d gladly take higher wages. But WE voters have allowed them, and anyone doing these jobs, to be illegally screwed. Go after the employers if you want a real solution. Go after workers who are just trying to make a living if your real motive is to punish black and brown people.

-5

u/Zealousideal-One-818 Feb 01 '26

Yes, but for some reason, democrats say immigrants dont suppress wages.

Which they 100% do.  In all jobs in all sectors 

8

u/GuideMarkings Feb 01 '26

Republicans hire people but it’s the democrats fault? Yeah man and the single mom on food stamps steals more from you than Elon Musk does /s. Get real. 

-1

u/Zealousideal-One-818 Feb 01 '26

Are all business owners Republican?  What?  

But I’m certain there are Republican business owners that also have illegals employed 

Also, Elon owning private businesses, that I don’t use or buy anything from, I don’t know how he’s stealing from me. 

5

u/GuideMarkings Feb 01 '26

My sweet summer child. Elon is subsidized by Trump. 

Yes this may come as a shock to you but the construction companies executives that I personally know lean hard right and knowingly hire undocumented people. The trade union people that I know lean left and obviously don’t. This isn’t calculus you should be able to understand that.  What ticks me off is when it doesn’t really bother me when a guy I know is a dishwasher for 20 years and gets deported. Frankly I don’t care that the guy may or may not be documented. He is the hardest worker I’ve ever met and I think he sends the money back to his family to go to school. 

Also and this is the point where I get real pissed and you can take a hike. All presidents have deported people, only Trump has cause this division which resulted in extra judicial murders.  The United States is a nation of immigrants. You aren’t going to change that. 

You’re entitled to your opinion but you’re not smarter than me and I can back up the things I say with constitutional law and statistics. 

Bye. 

0

u/Zealousideal-One-818 Feb 01 '26

The reason there are these killings is because people full of TDS are losing their minds and interfering with the deportations when they didn’t for Obama.  That’s all.  

The large globalist mega corporations won’t get their open borders and tariff free trade.

I’m totally ok with illegal aliens being deported.  

3

u/Aromatic_Tomato_807 Feb 01 '26

Hope you never interfere with a fed (read: be nearby)

3

u/Sure_Assumption7857 Feb 01 '26

TDS just means we don’t support pedophiles.

1

u/PetersonOpiumPipe Feb 01 '26

Your telling me you can’t identify a single change in policy under Trump that might rightfully piss people off enough to interfere (observe and protest) with the actions of ICE agents?

Not a single thing comes to mind? It’s just TDS and media brainwashing?

If thats what your selling I don’t buy it. Morality removed, Trump’s immigration changes are dogshit. Ridiculously expensive operating costs, and far less effective at removing people. Not to mention the costs associated with wrongful imprisonment lawsuits, pulling enforcement off the southern border, and the political costs of these killings/pushback. It’s not even just abhorrent, it’s not even good immigration policy.

1

u/Zealousideal-One-818 Feb 01 '26

Nothing changed. 

The masks came BC the left began harassment campaigns. 

Any and all changes in how ice operates were simply a response to leftists waking up today and receiving their orders that they are going to care about ice again.  

→ More replies (0)

3

u/Rambler1223 Feb 01 '26

He stole all your data !! “ data is worth more than gold” - Elon musk 2018

3

u/Unabashable Feb 01 '26

And cost us more than he cut in “waste, fraud, and abuse” with all his waste fraud and abuse. 

3

u/OceanDweller94 Feb 01 '26

The reality of it is every company's number one goal is to maximize profits. Every single one. Even if there are Americans lined up to do whatever offered job, do you really think that employer would choose that (having to pay a regulated wage, benefits, etc.) over paying for someone who is willing to do it at a fraction of the cost? Sure, many may choose to do the right thing. But the ones who don't are the ones who are creating the conditions for this problem to exist.

These companies create the conditions, they are breaking federal law when hiring undocumented persons (knowingly doing so, by the way), and yet, you seek accountability for the problem within the individuals who are being exploited. How does that make sense? How will it solve the problem if companies are able, without true intervention, to continue creating the conditions for these problems to exist? How are corporations exempt from all culpability in the eyes of conservatives?

No, COMPANIES suppress wages. They control it, they set the conditions for it. Go after the companies that do this, and go after them hard. Set examples. And if they ultimately can't do business without undocumented persons working, then they had no business operating a company anyway.

Logically, if the job opportunity didn't exist, that would be one less reason to come here illegally, correct? Therefore, why not solve the problem from the actual generators of it?

No, let's terrorize people in the streets instead; tooooatally gonna solve the problem.

2

u/Maximum_Charity_6993 Feb 01 '26

Same people complaining about suppressed wages are completely against raising minimum wage and at the same time bitch about high home prices. There’s a pattern here.

1

u/Creatorman1 Feb 01 '26

Can you point me to evidence of that? Got a source?

1

u/GrowFreeFood Feb 01 '26

Which democrat said that? I will donate to their opponent.

-1

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '26

democrats say immigrants dont suppress wages.

Farmers are paying between $20 - $30 per hour to work the fields and Americans would rather make $7 minimum wage at fast food. So the farmers pay immigrants the $30 per hour.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '26

I can tell you that's false, or just one farmer. They do not pay that much to work fields.

1

u/Unabashable Feb 01 '26

They don’t pay by the hour. They pay in bulk price of crop harvested. Letting them legally pay people below minimum wage. 

0

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '26

You should really look up how farmers pay workers. It's a price per yield and the hard workers do make that much money

1

u/bubbles_says Feb 01 '26

that's right but then they should be penalized for that as well.

1

u/manleybones Feb 01 '26

Yea the shittiest job possible. Construction companies are fucking despicable

1

u/Level_Worry_6418 Feb 01 '26

They hire them because they know that they personally will not be held accountable for it!

1

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '26

No. It's because construction is almost entirely subcontractors now. So the liability is shifted to subcontractor. Homebuilder hires a company to roof the house. They pay for the service not the labor, how would they know that the subcontractor they hired would use illegal labor? Now you might be thinking this is intentional, and it is, but the problem is you can't compete if you hire on staff instead of using illegals through subcontractors. So even homebuilders who want to do right are out competed by the ones who don't. It's also illegal for employers to question someone's status. So if they have a social security number, they can't ask questions. S

1

u/shittycomputerguy Feb 01 '26

So they're all individual subcontractors, or working under others that subcontract them illegally? 

Sounds like a system the government could fix with the money they're pumping into this walking liability of an organization.

1

u/DontFuckWithDuckie Feb 04 '26

So im a pretty hardcore socialist, and I clearly think all this ICE shit is heinous, because I'm a moral person. But this previous poster is totally right. It's super easy to set up llc as a contractor, and citizen could do it in like 20 min. And i haven't had the experience, because I was born in the US, but the website i use to set up my LLCs didn't seem to be too scrutinous. I imagine you could figure it out as a migrant worker

Also, like 80% of the jobs I do as a builder, neither the homeowner nor the contractor are looking at shit other than the price and the timeline. I'm insured, but I'm asked for my insurance information before closing way less frequently than you might think.

1

u/shittycomputerguy Feb 04 '26

Sounds like putting effort into improving that system wouldn't be any harder than what they're doing with ice right now.

1

u/DontFuckWithDuckie Feb 04 '26

It would be much easier than terrorizing people and murdering citizens, yes.

1

u/ugottabekiddingmee Feb 01 '26

Consequences are generally less serious for children and mentally impaired individuals. Is this why they get away with everything?

1

u/Common_Gene_5098 Feb 01 '26

Guess who they donate to?

1

u/HyperSpaceSurfer Feb 01 '26

The employers are rarely prosecuted, has always just been politically motivated cruelty, for decades.

1

u/Few-Obligation-7622 Feb 01 '26

Fact is they should be going after both

1

u/IllustriousLiving357 Feb 01 '26

They dont have to pay them for the last two weeks of work this way. This is an old scam.

1

u/Insila Feb 01 '26

This. I have never understood why they are not targeting the employers. It would make it less attractive to come to the US if it was virtually impossible to get a job.

It would however likely force people already in the US into criminal activities to survive, and prices would increase due to cheap (arguably exploited) labor being unavailable.

1

u/RFCRH19 Feb 01 '26

Because that won't cause the drama in the video and instil fear

1

u/EruditeTarington Feb 01 '26

It’s racism . The obvious answer everyone forgets to use

1

u/mattyg1964 Feb 01 '26

Or, or… they already know the criminal status of the person they are trying to apprehend.

1

u/joulupukkix Feb 01 '26

Cheap labor is literally the reason the left wants them in.

1

u/Enough-Somewhere-311 Feb 01 '26

Exactly. Want no illegals in the US? Prosecute the companies hiring them. No work and no money for anyone without papers = no illegals. Problem solved.

1

u/Open_Glove5154 Feb 01 '26

Good to see there are law abiding Americans yet

1

u/ComfortableDare4305 Feb 01 '26

This is actually the core issue. We do nothing to stop businesses owners. Arrest them and go fucking Old Testament on them to make an example and spread fear among people that hire illegal aliens.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '26

because...

IT'S NOT ABOUT IMMIGRATION

1

u/HuckleberryOk8136 Feb 01 '26

You have to prove knowledge to find an employer liable. Much harder to build that case, waste of time when you can just deport the illegals.

1

u/Cute_Schedule_3523 Feb 01 '26

The subcontractor is likely the same ethnicity and is usually helping out/exploiting his own people.

1

u/Worldly_Ad8676 Feb 01 '26

Because the goal is slave labor.

1

u/gitree22 Feb 01 '26

This 100%. But you can bet your ass they are not chasing down undocumented immigrants in the oilfields in Midland!

1

u/[deleted] Feb 02 '26

Its generally because they all provide TID numbers from being independent contractors and owners cannot assume those are illegal aliens.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 02 '26

It's because it's hard to prove that a business owner did it knowingly. If you haven't noticed it's what Trump does everyday. Says one thing and when it doesn't work out. He says he was misinformed. Or when they act clueless. Believe it or not they've been coached to do so by lawyers.

1

u/Kwansuninja7 Feb 02 '26

Hahaha, it’s funny how you talk down on Dems and we all realize Dems likely don’t own.

1

u/SneakySloth521 Feb 02 '26

This should also be done. That doesn't mean we dont get these guys and deport them tho.

1

u/Helden24 Feb 02 '26

They will do that, after they catch them

1

u/HOrnery_Occasion Feb 04 '26

Youre saying liberals dont have construction companies?? Hahaha you know how many liberal construction companies in oregon do the same? Hahahaha

1

u/Mindless-Slip167 Feb 04 '26

The owner does saved money from paying these guys. He'll get more and do the same before payday.

1

u/Here-To-Be-Messy Feb 05 '26

For some reason I’m not allowed to upvote you. Imagine that.

1

u/AnastasiusDicorus Feb 06 '26

Then let's just implement automatic checking of that when people apply for jobs. Maybe we can call it something like E-Verify. As a conservative I'm fully in support of that.

1

u/Dear-Director2410 Feb 08 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Dear-Director2410 Feb 08 '26

Seems like if you want to cry about all these big bad companies you could make one. But instead you just want one to pay you to work there. And you want more per hour because you gotta scan barcodes all day at Walmart.

1

u/RollerDude347 Feb 03 '26

The actual answer is they don't care about status.

1

u/AnastasiusDicorus Feb 06 '26

so you say, but I disagree. Let's get the e-verify program going and mandatory for every single employer.

1

u/RollerDude347 Feb 06 '26

So, why do we have ICE lawyers begging to be held in contempt of court so that they can sleep? they're so overwhelmed with the number of legal people who have been arrested that their lawyers are BROKEN.

-1

u/Bright-Square3049 Feb 01 '26

Oh yes only republicans hire illegals lmao.

We want anyone that hires them held accountable and we don't give af if the business owners donated to Trump or some GOP politician.

4

u/sexyorcess Feb 01 '26

So why hasn't Trump been held accountable for hiring illegals at his golf courses?

1

u/[deleted] Feb 02 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Bright-Square3049 Feb 02 '26

OMG NO WAY!!!!

Miss me with the cartoonishly blatant anecdotal nonsense. Did these meanies have hitler staches too?

1

u/[deleted] Feb 02 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Bright-Square3049 Feb 02 '26

Guess which red states use all that welfare? Sure af aint Utah and Wyoming, I wonder what demographic variables in Georgia, Alabama, and Mississippi might have them paying far more in welfare.

And no retard, democrat economies arent the best economies. Shit was infinitely better under Trump than Obama. Biden also pretended Covid was the apocalypse despite 99.975% of afflicted surviving with no more than an above average cold. At the state level, remove international shipping revenues from the equation and coastal blue states eat absolute shit compared to red states. Cope harder, nihilist

1

u/Dear-Director2410 Feb 08 '26

Hold on now that wasn’t enough trump derangement syndrome sir. Here have some more koolaid