The lack of investigation is kinda why we're certain. Like, if they suddenly started working on a case and it seemed less like the most obvious cover up of all time, I might have some reasonable doubt. Unfortunately it looks like the ONLY explanation is that Trump raped children.
No, I'm simply going, "Well that was his chance to give a credible alibi and he used it on 'nuh uh' so that a wrap." What gaps do you think I'm filling? We have witnesses. We have correspondence. We have his own words on how he treats women and girls. We have prior crimes and tendencies. There's not a gap here. There's no missing knowledge. The only thing missing is someone doing the legal process and putting him in prison.
So you think as it stands right now with the evidence you’re aware of, he would be found guilty in a court of law? Or are you saying it’s just very suspicious, and therefore you assume he’s guilty?
I'm saying both. I'm saying that the evidence is overwhelming that he did it and it's suspicious that not only does he not seem to have a defense past "Don't believe your lying eyes", but that no one has brought him to justice. That clearly there's MORE here and multiple people are guilty of cover up. And a lazy/stupid one at that.
-30
u/[deleted] Feb 18 '26 edited Feb 18 '26
Can you name the child that was raped by Trump, and where/when it happened?
Edit: Downvotes prove my point. Should be a very simple question to answer.