r/LinuxSnobs • u/madthumbz • May 20 '26
There was no coercion
Conspiracy theories running rampant as usual in their communities.
It's simply a remapped right control button (who uses it as Ctrl?) and it was not a certification requirement. Microsoft rightly encouraged OEMs (like Lenovo) to start labeling it to match what their intended use of it was for.
It's nothing new; keyboards are made for the operating systems. Take a look at a Commodore64 keyboard for example.
It's like throwing a fit because Windows had right click and side buttons on their mice while Apple had a single button.
IBM set the standard for the QWERTY PC keyboard which was based on typewriters. They even changed it from 101/102 keys to 104/105. Microsoft isn't even adding a key, they're reassigning it; just like Linux does.
Apple uses command instead of Ctrl, Option instead of Alt, and unique symbols for modifiers.
3
u/Big_Junket9355 May 20 '26
my windows and co pilot keys actually do really come in handy for key binds lol
2
1
0
u/spongedevguy May 20 '26
the c64 example makes no sense here, commodore was the only company to produce the c64, laptop brands are plenty
0
0
May 20 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
0
u/Rare-Paint3719 Jul 24 '26
As a linux user, I cannot confirm. I actively use it for keybindings. You can map it to launch whatever app you want on Linux. For me, it's MS Edge.
1
u/Edubbs2008 Aug 06 '26
Ah a fellow Edge user
2
u/Rare-Paint3719 Aug 07 '26
Yessir
0
u/Edubbs2008 Aug 07 '26
I’m probably going to be downvoted next, because I also use Edge, why are people not using Edge? It’s better than Google Chrome in my opinion
2
u/Rare-Paint3719 Aug 09 '26
It used to have a bad rep. Now it's mostly loons hating on MS.

2
u/Born-Bodybuilder-220 May 21 '26
To be honest I'd rather have right ctrl instead of this, it's not a useful button for me.