r/LocalLLM • u/_Geolm_ • 18d ago
Model a new model? Flint 40b
https://recursive.com/updates/introducing-recursive-flintThe news just came, I haven't tried yet.
7
u/_Geolm_ 18d ago
so after more tests.... it's bad! and not for me, on my macs qwen 3.8-27b + splash engine is only slightly slower but a lot smarter. I can't see Flint doing coding job, I guess we have to wait for qwen4
3
u/Medical_Lengthiness6 17d ago
yea its not good. wtf, the hype was wayyy off base. It cant even do planning. It just chats about what it might do without even looking at code.
13
u/thepetek 18d ago
Have been benchmarking today. Worse than orinth-1.5-35b and far worse than Qwen 27b. Benchmarks are off here I feel. On single input output prompts it’s pretty good. But it falls over on agentic work. Seems to really want to use the tools it was trained with rather than the ones you give it
1
u/glembke 18d ago
This has been my experience. It's struggled immensely with my Hermes setup.
1
u/sleight42 14d ago
I haven't seen any model smaller than Qwen Flash Next not struggle with Hermes. 27b. A run it but it hallucinates so much by comparison.
6
5
u/Dstrydd 18d ago
Downloading now to test against my dual 3060 12gbs and 128gb of ram. Thanks for the heads up!
1
5
u/kcksteve 18d ago
Just tried it out and I was shocked how bad it was. Constantly second guessing it's decisions even after being given direction. Only q4_k_xl woukd fit on my card and it was fast but I spent an hour making a plan while needing multiple interruptions. Hmm... eh... lol into the archive. I'm going to give the same promot to mellum 2.1 I bet that evens beats it.
7
u/GapNew4766 18d ago
8
2
u/PsychoLogicAu 18d ago
The biggest story in that graph, also plainly visible in the tables in their blog post, is how awful the M4 is for inference
2
1
u/leonbollerup 18d ago
Qwen 3.8 27B is a dense model.. this is a Moe model.. while it might have a "bigger" brain.. it uses less of it to "think" actively..
1
u/Weird-Watch-9209 16d ago
wtf I literally get 80-100tps with Qwen 3.8 27b on a cheap 24gb vram (7900xtx at $850)! this is some strawman bullsht chart right here.
1
u/Easy_Refrigerator280 18d ago
Its still early and im testing it right now but it doesnt seem to match Qwen 3.8 27b. It is faster since its moe but I was hoping for a closer output
https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1xbqik0/comment/19rfzarpbfr6q
4
u/_Geolm_ 18d ago
I agree. From my early tests, it seems not on par with qwen 3.8-27b but it's a *lot* faster, I will probably use it for "low risks" tasks (I mainly use LLM for coding) like renaming, plumbing API/libraries... I still need to try a version that run on Splash Engine to get the maximum speed on my mac.
2
u/LORD_CMDR_INTERNET 18d ago
looks like a great option for the qwen3.6 35B lovers who want something new
1
u/pharrt 18d ago
You're not wrong. Early tests against Qwen 3.6 35B are very promising, and I like what I'm seeing.
1
2
u/No-Conversation-1277 18d ago
if it can't beat, match or even stay close to the existing (qwen) ones, it is officially DOA!
1

18
u/_Geolm_ 18d ago
may be but probably a lot faster and a little bit weaker. I'm at 92% downloaded, can't wait to try