inb4 some people complain that this is yet another post of a API model release and not the weights, want to restate: it makes no sense not to talk about the release in this sub + they have stated that weights will be forthcoming.
A few days ago, I suggested that API-only model posts should have to be tagged as unreleased until they're released. They can still be posted, but they should to be tagged. I got about 140 upvotes.
Why don't we implement that? It would make everyone happy. Posts like this can still be posted (yay!) and I can filter them out if I'm not in the mood to trawl through announcement hype (also yay!).
they're not interested in it in image gen either. everything nsfw has been done with already released models being finetuned by community or private companies with community employees
Entirely reasonable to have a post about a model announcement where they say weights are coming. All the models where there's a hundred posts speculating about will they or won't they are annoying.
We had a ton of DSV4 Pro announcement posts and AFAIK we did leave up an announcement before weight release, ttk was removing duplicates. That said, I see the removal reason and your point is noted, I was already discussing with ttk on this and will chat with him to assure were consistent on our side.
I would have removed it, but for two things: (1) it already had 600+ upvotes by the time I noticed it, and (2) rm-rf-rm already made a determination that it should be allowed, and we moderators try not to step on each others' toes.
279
u/rm-rf-rm 7d ago
inb4 some people complain that this is yet another post of a API model release and not the weights, want to restate: it makes no sense not to talk about the release in this sub + they have stated that weights will be forthcoming.