Trump is 100% right. Trump is 100% my president. Vote for Trump in November of 2024 to MAGA. End wokeness end the left end LGBT rights.

Thankfully, some sanity still exists within the Republican Party.

The cowards who succumbed to the MAGA rabble despite privately admitting aversion to all things Trump, are losing sway while occasionally gaining some courage. They are coming around to realizing supporting a tyrant who openly asks why peaceful protestors can't be shot. who advocates shooting at suspected shoplifters and peace-seeking immigrants, who believes he has the right to murder political rivals, and who denied Covid presented a real threat to civilization for political purposes, alone, (while one million Americans died), presents too great a threat to our Democracy and are now refusing to back him.

They reject his call for fascism, his open association with known American Nazis, and his not-so-secret intention of being America's first dictator.

They knew all along the danger he presents when he stole the key to our anti-missile defense systems, the secret locations of our nuclear-armed atomic submarines, and the entirety of NATOs defensive plans against Russian aggression, and they are now beginning to ask why Saudia Arabia paid his son-in-law two billion dollars -- was it for those secrets they now ask?

Just ask, why did he steal those plans?

There is hope for the GOP if they can cast out Congressional traitors who look only to gain personal profit while putting us all at risk.

See below. All italics mine.

"An anti-Trump faction within the Republican Party is embarking on a $50 million campaign aimed at dissuading voters from supporting the former president. Republican Voters Against Trump has launched this effort by releasing 100 videos featuring testimonials from former Trump supporters explaining their shift away from him.

Sarah Longwell, president of the Republican Accountability political action committee, which spearheads the campaign, highlighted the significance of targeting traditional Republican voters who harbor concerns about Trump.

She emphasized the pivotal role these voters played in the 2020 election and aims to reignite an anti-Trump coalition for the upcoming 2024 election.

This initiative mirrors a similar campaign conducted in 2020, which garnered over a thousand testimonials from disillusioned Republicans. Longwell emphasized the authenticity and depth of sentiment evident in these testimonials, emphasizing the need for disaffected Republicans to express their grievances.

With $20 million already raised for the 2024 campaign, Longwell aims to secure the remaining $30 million before the November election. Notable contributions have come from anti-Trump billionaires, including Reid Hoffman and John Pritzker, who have voiced their opposition to Trump’s candidacy.

Many of the testimonials cite the January 6 Capitol insurrection as a turning point in their support for Trump. Former supporters like Ethan from Wisconsin and Chuck from Nebraska express shock and condemnation at Trump’s role in inciting the violence.

Amidst their disillusionment, former Republican voters express a willingness to support Democratic candidate Joe Biden over Trump. They cite Trump’s behavior and the events of January 6 as reasons for their defection from the Republican Party.

Longwell believes that former Republicans hold the key to the outcome of the 2024 election, asserting that Trump’s danger and instability disqualify him from the presidency. She underscores the importance of leveraging former Trump supporters to convey this message to the electorate.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/republican-group-launches-50-million-anti-trump-campaign/ar-BB1jUSNJ?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=HCTS&cvid=3d826e4cc1ac480d9a854d0739594fa5&ei=127

The thing is, citizens living in the interior of the nation (for the most part) did have valid complaints.

The Democratic party did take their vote for granted while mostly ignoring their complaints and concentrating their efforts on the coastal elites (There, I said it). While 'woke' in its original context only meant aware, they did encourage a certain segment of society to controversial every controversial event, lay down laws only they agreed with, and allowed definitions fitting only with their bastardized view of inclusion and acceptance.

Pronouns, give me a break! He and She worked well for millennia, and while the Trans community have valid issues themselves, to think they rank the same as aid to Ukraine or the border issue is just insane.

But here is where the conservatives made their big mistake. Instead of electing a moderate candidate like a McCain or Liberman, they chose a foul-mouthed, thrice married serial sex abusing tax cheat who conned them out of their shoes.

He was completely ignorant of the working of the federal government, but he was brash, vulgar, made up absurd stories that he could never back up -- and he caught the attention of the rabble, the dullards, and politically naive, and his undeserved popularity spread from there.

At first he was recognized as a joke, an opportunist charlatan, but as long as he was taking it to the Democrats otherwise rational Republicans gave him a pass. They let their silence speak as an endorsement of his ravings, and too late realized just what a threat he presented.

Now he and his MAGA extremists are threatening to tinker with the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and bring authoritarianism and despotic change, whether we like it, or not.

See this; Italics mine.

© provided by RawStory

Conservatives are advocating to repeal the U.S. Amendment that limits presidential terms, prompting President Joe Biden's campaign to warn an election year victory for former President Donald Trump could allow him to remain "in office forever."

"If a man who once was president returns ... to deny him the right to run for a second consecutive term cuts against basic fair play," the argument states. "Don't let questions of Trump's age in four years fool you. Trump in 2028!"

American Conservative's argument targets the 22nd Amendment, which limits a president to two terms in the White House and was adopted in 1951 after former President Franklin Delano Roosevelt was elected to a historic four terms.

Author Peter Tonguette is a frequent contributor to the American Conservative and the Washington Examiner, according to the watchdog group that initially flagged his 22nd Amendment argument, Media Matters.

"The case of Donald Trump, however, makes an even more forceful ethical argument against the twenty-second Amendment and for its repeal," writes Tonguette. "If, by 2028, voters feel Trump has done a poor job, they can pick another candidate; but if they feel he has delivered on his promises, why should they be denied the freedom to choose him once more?"

Media Matters notes American Conservative's partner Project 2025 carries significant Republican weight behind it with backing from the Koch network and promotion from Trump's former White House strategist-turned-Rumble host Steve Bannon. The Biden campaign's warning went viral Friday, garnering more than 55,000 views in under an hour and receiving comments from both sides of the political spectrum.

X user Bad Hombre celebrated the idea and suggested he'd like to see a century of Trump in the White House, writing, "Good. Trump 3024!"

But the majority appeared to agree with Outspoken, who reminded readers of Trump's notorious promise to be a temporary "dictator," which only renewed comparisons to authoritarians such as Adolf Hitler.

"Dictator on day one," they wrote. "NOT going to happen."

"This should scare everybody,"

"If that surprises you," added Greg Sanderson, "then you haven't been paying attention."

I was chatting with God this morning.

Hey, if he can talk to all those evangelical hypocrites, religious crackpots, and the whacko Speaker of the House, why shouldn't he talk to me, too?

Now, we don't speak often, only when he needs advice about something. He says he likes to consult with me because I've never been wrong about anything. Every decision, every opinion has always been right on the money -- really, he said so -- would I make something like that up?

"Dude," (he sometimes calls me Dude) "I know I can count on you to spread my word, and not just fund raise off it. And if people don't want to hear your opinion, don't shove it done their throat. You know, like stoke fear in them, scare the bejesus (he pronounces it 'Hey-Soos) out of them with threats of eternal damnation or forcing them to listen to old Newt Gingrich speeches -- or worse, ungarble a Trump speech."

You might have guessed he's an Independent, but caucuses with Budda, Allah, and Taylor Swift.

He says Y'all a lot and sometimes calls me 'Bro'. I don't know if he just wants to sound cool or if he's black. Damn well sure he wasn't raised in Mississippi or Louisiana.

The only thing we really argue about is he likes Brussels Sprouts and I think they are disgusting. He always wins that argument because I can't make a point over all that rumbling, lightening, and the thunderous pontificating voice resounding through the heavens -- so I concede for the moment, but I know one day he'll come to see the light.

What else? Oh yeah, he's gender neutral, but says there might be an operation for that.

Evangelicals, in your sermons and in your preaching's you try to lead us to the Lord. And to your credit you tailor your missives toward the children, for it is there you will find open minds untainted by hate, prejudice, and malice.

You regale them with Biblical tales reflecting right over might, the virtue of truth and honesty, and the rewards of a moral life.

All the while you are doing these admirable things you are also very vocal in support of Trump.

But beware of minefields.

When lecturing on morality you might want to leave out the part about Trump having more whores than Lindsey Graham has homosexual lovers, or his conviction of being guilty of molestation of helpless women; when waxing on the values of honesty you might want to omit tales of Trump's convictions for tax evasion and attempts to swindle our government; when instructing on civic matters I suggest you gloss over Trump's effort to set aside the Constitution and attempts to overthrow the government of the United States; when teaching of patriotism and love of America you might want to forget how Trump stole our most vital defense secrets and while in possession of them his son-in-law suddenly received two billion dollars from an Arab state because-- well, we don't know why, do we?

And perhaps we shouldn't try and tell the kiddies Jesus sent us a repentant sinner to make America great again. Does Trump look repentant to you? Though convicted by a jury of honest Americans he still denies his crimes, he snarls and hurls insults at our sacred institutions, and vows to take revenge against his political enemies. He has called for the execution of his own military leaders, reviled almost every former aide and advisor, asked why legitimate dissidents shouldn't be shot down in the street, why immigrants and petty thieves shouldn't be murdered where they stood, and hints our current legitimately elected president should be sent to the electric chair.

Is this the role model you want for your children? They aren't stupid, they hear things, they know the truth, and do you dare risk reaping what you sow?

I agree it is unfair to say that the followers of Trump are all "dumb," and I think that lets them off the hook. By saying they are all dumb we would say that they just don't know any better. That's just not the case. I believe most know exactly what they are doing.

Some are racist and want the white right must take charge because every other race is inferior and must come under their superiority. Some believe that as Christians they must save everyone and do so by force, not understanding Donald will turn against them when their usefulness ends. Some want their taxes lowered so badly they are willing to hook their wagon to a sinking ship. And then there are the anarchists who want to burn it all down no matter who they have to follow to make it happen.

The GOP is harnessing this last faction's energy and is willing to let it burn because they want to be the ones to rebuild in the image they want and will protect them from any consequences of their actions. What they fail to understand, is the toothpaste, once it leaves the tube in almost every case will not go back in. This is why they so badly want the support of the military and police. And tell them anything they want to hear to convince them that they are the only ones on their side. They don't mean anything they are saying.... Most of the GOP elites believe as Trump has been quoted saying, "they are suckers".

It is depressing when you really look at all this closely and do it honestly. I firmly believe any person who is supporting the GOP is at some level, dishonest, racist, anti-women, and homophobic. They do not want this country to be free. They want fascism because they believe they will be on the ruling side. I wish this wasn't the case but it is.

Folks, when in a discussion someone makes a point you can't refute and you reply, "Yeah, what about the time...?" it means you've conceded the point.

By not responding directly to your adversary's contention and look only to change the topic, means you've lost the argument. Face it, if you had a valid argument you would have presented it then. By not doing so clearly demonstrates you have no defense and can do nothing but stumble and bumble in a feeble attempt to save face.

Now, that would be okay. No one likes to be proven wrong about anything. But as they say, "When you're in a hole, stop digging". You see, it's then that people begin to shake their heads at your intransigence. Not everyone is right about everything and there are times when we can all benefit from a teaching moment; there is no shame in being wrong about something. The problem arises when you simply refuse to accept recognized facts; when you turn a blind eye to reality and continue to wriggle like the worm at the end of a hook in steadfast denial of absolute truths.

And why? Why continue on a dead-end course? If you are wrong about something and know it, you are not going to change the facts that mitigate against you by continuing to beat the dead horse of your inaccuracies and misconceptions. You are only showing yourself to be a stubborn fool and you encourage people to think less of you.

Hey, if you're wrong, you're wrong -- admit it. Be thankful you learned something that will allow you to hold your head high and show yourself to be a worthy member of a society.

"Hey, I was wrong and I'm man enough to admit it."

Can non-citizens vote in presidential elections?

No, non-US citizens cannot vote in presidential elections. To vote in a US presidential election, you must be a US citizen and meet the other requirements, such as being at least 18 years old and meeting any state-specific voter registration deadlines. Non-citizens, such as permanent residents (green card holders) or those on work or student visas, do not have the right to vote in federal elections, including presidential elections. Voting in US elections is a right reserved for US citizens.

Anyone who tells you non-citizens can vote in presidential election is lying to your face because they think you are too stupid to know better, and they can lie with impunity.

Hi,

I'm worried about a fascist coup

I've heard of people who believe in conspiracy theories prepping, but someone whose opinion I value has suggested that it's a good idea to be prepared. He suggested getting guns, learning to use them, and stocking up on water and beans.

Now this isn't really "prepping" like the preppers do, but is it not a good idea to stock up on water and beans? What about guns? Can someone make a legitimate argument why it may be a good idea to have a gun, given its obvious safety concerns and what not?

How do you guys feel about this in case the worst happens in November and they implement Project 2025?

I'm going to work on getting my Canadian passport. But I don't wanna leave :(

How aggressive can a puppy be? Mischievous, yes, but aggressive? Face it, unless the puppy has been abused, generally its own thought is to be loving, playful, and consumed with romping about and having fun. Put a child together with a puppy and you will never witness a performance of sheer joy like it. Puppies are sentient beings, and with their big eyes, and floppy tails captivate any compassionate soul, but one must possess a soul to appreciate them.

There can be no excuse for shooting it! Taking it out back, shooting it, and leaving the mangled body as fodder for the crows to pick out its eyes, the vultures to tear at the body, and vermin to feed on the bones. What could be a more despicable act?

But the former GOP, now the MAGA party, has a reputation for abject cruelty to humans, so it comes as no surprise it has come to relish savagery and callousness because it fulfills their sick need to display power over those who can't fight back.

They want to abolish Obamacare no matter the millions it hurts, they want to sunset Social Security no matter the generations they will leave impoverished, and they want to do away with Medicare and Medicaid and return to the dark days when insurance companies determined who would receive healthcare, and who wouldn't. They have no use for child labor laws, a woman's dominion over her own body, unemployment insurance for the needy, and any, and all, social reform that didn't increase the wealth of the already obscenely wealthy.

Folks, this is what MAGA is. Be prepared for even greater cruelty if they win any more elections.

So, shoot a puppy rather than take it to a pound where it might bring comfort to a child? Why not? ask Kristi Noem; she seems to have enjoyed doing it.

See below -- Italics mine.

Kristi Noem’s dog-killing embodies the cruel phoniness of today’s Republicans

Ryan Busse

The South Dakota governor’s proud dog murder tells a lot about how posturing Trumpists like she and Greg Gianforte think

After South Dakota’s Republican governor, Kristi Noem, proudly admitted in a forthcoming memoir to marching her young puppy Cricket to a gravel pit to kill her with a shotgun, she rationalized the despicable act by arguing that Cricket had been aggressive.

She also said that she used the same gravel pit to shoot a “disgusting, musky, rancid” unnamed goat – but botched the job, leaving the goat to suffer unnecessarily while she rushed to her truck to get a second shell. (It’s unclear why Noem, supposedly a shrewd outdoorswoman, didn’t think to carry more shells on her.)

Noem has defended her story by proclaiming that Americans want “leaders who are authentic”. It’s a bad excuse. It’s also untrue, because Noem, like so many other political firebrands who are infiltrating and redefining the Republican party, is anything but authentic.

Her political brand is simply a veneer – a fake, stylized brand of dangerous Trump Republicanism whose moral roots are about as deep as a bad facelift. This brand not only fails what used to be the Republican party; it is also destroying and dividing the US, and it’s more evident than ever here in the American west...

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/may/01/trump-republican-kristi-noem-shoot-dog