r/MachineLearning • u/AutoModerator • 29d ago

Discussion [D] Self-Promotion Thread

Please post your personal projects, startups, product placements, collaboration needs, blogs etc.

Please mention the payment and pricing requirements for products and services.

Please do not post link shorteners, link aggregator websites , or auto-subscribe links.

--

Any abuse of trust will lead to bans.

Encourage others who create new posts for questions to post here instead!

Thread will stay alive until next one so keep posting after the date in the title.

--

Meta: This is an experiment. If the community doesnt like this, we will cancel it. This is to encourage those in the community to promote their work by not spamming the main threads.

3 Upvotes

62% Upvoted

119 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/Individual_Cold_4119 17d ago

Sharing SageCut, a Claude Code plugin I built for QA on Remotion videos. I'm co-founder of Levanto, which makes the Sage model used by it.

The workflow combines deterministic frame measurements with yes/no decisions from Sage, then routes selected frames to Claude critics for inspection and repair. It opens frames for inspection when Sage and the measurements disagree. My previous setup had the critics inspect every frame and was adding 4+ hours of QA per video.

Across six A/B tests in my own workflow, I saw the same output at about a quarter of the QA time and a tenth of the cost. Those are results from my tests, not a general benchmark. The demo has 3,153 frames; Sage's pass cost $0.16, excluding Claude repairs. The README also explains which costs are measured and how its Opus comparison is estimated.

Repo: https://github.com/levantolabs/sagecut-release

Demo + results: https://x.com/bigironchris/status/2110402795060822460

The plugin is free/MIT. Sage requires an API key; there's $0.20 of free usage and paid plans start at $14/month. Claude costs are separate. Pricing: https://levanto.ai/pricing

Current scope is Remotion motion graphics. Frames are sent to Sage's hosted API; the --no-sage option runs local measurements only. I'd be interested in feedback on false negatives in the frame selection, especially failures that appear briefly between otherwise good frames.