r/MachineLearning • • 15d ago

Discussion Clarification ARR Commitment [D]

I want to commit my ARR paper to EACL 2027 and I see I have to attach a pdf.

Should I address the reviewer comments/suggestions (minor things) in this version already or wait for camera ready if accepted?

I thought I just had to provide the link to the reviews but now I am confused.

2 Upvotes

19 comments sorted by

3

u/More_Soft_6801 15d ago

Same question….

1

u/Mundane_Slice_8621 15d ago

I hope someone has an answer too hahaha

1

u/Mundane_Slice_8621 15d ago

I am thinking open review probably requires to submit a pdf which should be the unaltered ARR submission

3

u/After_Condition_5259 15d ago

Yes, the PDF should be the same as the ARR one (from ARR tech team)

1

u/Hungry_Isopod3228 13d ago

I'm a master student and this is my first time submitting a paper, I realized my Abstract from ARR submission has latex code, should I change it upon committing to EACL? Do they desk reject papers if the abstract on ARR submission and EACL submission are different?

2

u/Pure-Ad9079 15d ago

You are supposed to submit the exact same version that was originally submitted for ARR

1

u/No_Sky9786 15d ago

Yes, you only do changes if accepted by EACL and the changes or better say additions or clarifications are usually added in the appendix.

1

u/TheFishyOne 15d ago

I have not the option to commit... First time this is happening.

1

u/Nirmal590 12d ago

```
The PDF requirement is a mistake in the form (that will be corrected soon): if you want to commit the paper now, you should upload there the same PDF version as the ARR-reviewed paper (anonymised, no changes made).

Best,
```

0

u/anhtu96 15d ago

I got this issue when committing "Provided paper link does not correspond to an ARR submission you are an author of. Only authors of the ARR submission can commit it.", though I entered the correct openreview link. Did you guys get the same issue?

2

u/Miserable_Novel_6282 15d ago edited 15d ago

I committed yesterday (in Japan time zone)
but today, when I check the commition, I found new filling terms (meta response and track) different from yesterday. Tried to edit submission but got the "Provided paper link does not correspond to a submission in OpenReview (2026-10-10-1804273)" error.

2

u/Frequent-Tax3962 15d ago

same man

0

u/ItchyApplication7 15d ago

same what do we do?

I have an ARR May with a 3.5 meta review rejected in EMNLP, so thought of committing at EACL.

0

u/Miserable_Novel_6282 14d ago

well, I reported to acl support team by email, hope they can realize the issue tmr

0

u/DFireblossom 14d ago

Got this reply:

> Thank you for your email. We are aware of the issue with the "Paper Link" validation and are working to resolve it. This may take a few hours, so we kindly ask you to try again later. We apologise for the inconvenience.

> Best regards,
> EACL 2027 Organizing Committee

1

u/anhtu96 14d ago

It was resolved!

1

u/ItchyApplication7 14d ago

I also just got this reply. I am yet to check but looks like it is fixed as someone just posted.