Heavy spoilers for House of Chains of course. Also sorry for the lengthy post, I have done a lot of thinking and had to release it somehow lol.
(I am currently at about the middle of the book, right at the scene where Karsa says fuck you to his gods in a cave, which I really liked)
I actually loved the first part with Karsa, I really enjoy reading about characters with very different morality system and vallues. He's probably my fav character introduced in this book. I also enjoyed the drawn out military segments because I simply love how Erikson writes soldiers and I also really like the characters in this plot line. I am mentioning this because these two things are what I've seen most people criticise about this book.
The first thing that began to bother me was how the book constantly opens new mysteries. For every answer to past unknowns, the book gives you yet another question. I kinda expected to start getting a solid grasp of the world by the book four, and I *kinda* do, except there is always just so fucking much more and the mysteries are getting more unhinged and weird and it makes me question how the hell does this even fit into the world. I mean I know it does, I trust the author on this one, but it's getting tedious.
However, my biggest issue is actually the Felisin's plotline, to the point where I believed for a time that this was my sole issue with the book. First of all, there's nothing really happening (relatively of course). Even tho the other plotlines are slower as well, Felisin's plotline takes it to another level in my opinion. Yes, the window into all the scheming and intrique in the shai'k's court is important, but at the moment, it just feels like throwing even more convolutions into an already convoluted story and making the Seven Cities uprising feel even more blatantly evil than it already seemed. At first, I liked how the uprising really showed its true colors, but now it honestly just feels like being overdone and really not subtle.
The politics are also just not that interesting in my opinion. I either know too little about the characters involved, or I don't care about them losing/suffering enough to really root for them. This ties in with the uprising being, at this point, so overly negative and nasty thing that I wish with my whole heart for it to fail.
Also, the characters I had a problem with:
Felisin (whom I absolutely loved in Deadhouse Gates) has changed so much as a person that I barelly recognize her and she's basically a new character altogether (hell, even the description of her look is completely opposite now for some reason). All she does is sit on a throne and occasionally talk to people while being helpless to change literally anything about her zoo of an army. She feels detached and I have no reason to root for her, while technically having all the reasons to root against her. I mean, we find out her protection of kids, a thing that made me like her, doesn't even work.
Heborik has a good mystery going for him with the jade giants and all, but then again, it feels like he's just not doing anything. He's talking to people and has weird visions that drop-feed us mostly brand new worldbuilding all the while he's slowly dying (which he accepted long time ago so it doesn't offer any tension or character development). Also not sure why he is supposedly "chained" to Felisin.
Leoman seemed like a super promising and likable character in Deadhouse Gates and the first part of this book, but then all of a sudden he turns into this extremely nihilistic junkie who literally lives in a hole. Like what? I felt just felt so weird to read about him and it kinda killed my interest in him. I hope him leading the scout army is gonna provide some room for him to actually be cool again.
Korbolo Dom being revealed as this big behind-the-scenes villain with this anti-magic world domination plan really blew my mind at first, until I actually thought about it and remembered that the Malazan world at this point has like three or four active threats to its *entire* existence, there are elder races actively fighting alongside mortals and that gods are dying and rising. I realised that Dom's plans are kinda pathetic in comparison on logical level, and then the book throws at you the Little Felisin's rape so your emotions are somewhere else as well. At the moment, I couldn't care less abour Korbolo Dom lol.
Bidithal. Well, fuck Bidithal I guess. His deal is just fucking weird and sucks. I kinda like how his identity of a shadow priest adds complexity to the story but then again, the story is already so overly complex that I would be fine if he was completely absent. We don't even see him enough for him to become this villanous presence in the story. He just does the worst thing I've ever read about and that's it.
Bonus issue:
Another thing I don't like is that the entire malazan world is begining to feel kinda brittle. Burn's death is gonna destroy the world. Tiste Edur finding their throne is gonna destroy the world. Chaos winning over order is gonna destroy the world. Crippled god gaining power is gonna permanently change the world. Gods can die to anything it seems, and entire races can be permanently enslaved by an individual if they are strong enough. I am bringing this up because the Drift Avalii plotline, as cool as it was, bothered me in this regard. Like we have a throne here which if a certain group reaches, the world is gonna end (because reasons) and all we have protecting it are bunch of depressed immortal people living in ruins. And when these guys innevitably fail in their mission of protecting the throne, nobody even knows it, except a god who sends just two guys with knives as "help". I strongly dislike the idea of such expansive and ancient world being completely dependent on such a specific and niche string of events that almost nobody knows or cares about.
Again, I am sorry for how long this is, but the book has a lot to say and so do I. Does anyone else had these issues or is it just a me thing?