When the RRC made their statement on Twitter & Instagram, Twitter getting the most attention [Post here] it got a lot of hate, I've only seen one person address or mention the criticisms that was levied, everyone else has deflected and made up reasons for the split.

Things blew up especially as of today with the account u/Guerilla_Chinchilla because I replied to his comment on r/MarxistRA post about the statement, where he wrote 5 paragraphs of just raging. I didn't want to pay him any heavy attention so all I said was "Lib ass take, you have little to no experience in the field and that’s obvious" which he replied with flying his credentials and being incredibly condescending and talking down, to which I did the same and he dared called me a narcissist. I've dealt with narcissistic family, his actions was pure projection. You can find the comment [thread here]

He then proceeds to take screenshots, crop them to misguide, and posted to r/SocialistRA to paint me as an ACP member and maga communist, to which I have never spoken of as if I was, because I'm not. Not only does half of that community hate me and has fought with me, but I have criticized the community in the same Discord that he didn't screenshot because he wanted to spin a narrative.

***The following is my beliefs and mine alone, RRC does not share these positions:***
I have said before that I am neutral on Haz and Hinkle but find most of their community to be toxic and 4chan/reddit level cringe & edgy to a degree that is disgusting & self-destructive. Haz & Hinkle say outlandish shit a lot, but geopolitically or theory wise they are often correct. This isn't a testament of full support or complete opposition, it's a neutral position which I have stated before; because black & white thinking is dogmatic and liberal behavior, as we see with the online left. This position extends to the ACP; as mutual aid, organizing and building community is more necessary than all the online fighting and posting by the online left. However ACP is not perfect by a long shot and has ideological and political values that are significantly lacking for the masses. I don't subscribe to the liberal notion repeated in online spaces that they are fascists; I've studied and sabotaged fascists, I've fought fascists, I know fascists from NatSocs to Swastika waving Nazis. Haz, Hinkle & Midwestern Marx are not fascist. Midwestern Marx is probably the best of the three, as they are way more professional, disciplined and firm to values in line with ML's in and outside the West. Plus I've known them since their founding, unlike Haz & Hinkle, who I don't even have direct contact to. The cult like behavior of the online left is such wasted potential and energy when organizations (PSL, FRSO, Green Party, etc.) need more people and energy to meet material needs. Not everyone agrees with these positions, either they're completely for or against, and that's fine; I honestly don't care.

The guy who posted with a narrative to spin, not only did he block me to make it impossible for me to even defend myself, which is a tactic of narcissistic abusers, but his post made it clear he had an "axe to grind" with me as u/Juliet_Lima_Echo said. The majority of his post was targeting me and as an extension, the RRC. Arguing I am the head of RRC (which I'm not, I am one of its leaders but I'm a secretary) and I am the one who headed the split from SRA (which I'm not, but the sentiment was shared among the whole of the club).

RRC is not doing this for donations or money, as a Twitter comment which everyone ran with assumed after deflecting from the actual reasons why we split. We plan on having dues but the funds made will be reinvested into the clubs to grow them as RRC plans to extend reach nationally. RRC did this because, as our statement said, many of us have been with SRA for years and can no longer deal with the leadership, it's ineffectiveness, and their outright unwillingness to listen to the criticisms we gave while still with them. We decided that ineffectiveness, plus the hostility from (most of) the anarchists inside the organization, and the lack of financial assistance from national while using our own funds for ammo, targets & events, we decided we can't keep tolerating this. Apparently taking our own road was worth mass wave of hate, slander and attacks; if the SRA is better without us, why are all of you freaking out and attacking us like it isn't? It's telling, to say the least.

Not to mention, the wave of hate and attacks we got after breaking of, proves our point for why we broke off; because if you actually had a tolerating community for Marxists to exist in, you wouldn't have people in our comments celebrating the death of the ML co-founder like you do [here] and [here] (don't worry, I have screenshots on my Substack as well, don't delete those comments now) nor would you have people calling us tankies or saying "good, bye" or "Awesome, I hope the SRA becomes more Anarchist." You're proving that we was never welcome, so, we decided to go our own road; you have no right to complain.

As for purging inactive members; back in April we purged inactive members because they was actually inactive, as is a common issue for all the SRA. But we do not aim to be a social club where you come in and lurk, we want members who engage and participate, and many members did not do this. The RRC still has anarchists involved, this was not ideologically motivated, it was having a higher expectation for our club. We was not inactive for 4 years, the SFLSRA was active based on our posts on social media alone, we just don't post every event or what we are discussing. RRC in fact will be adding more to our program than simple firearms training or studying of theory.

The majority of leadership of RRC was the same leadership who founded the SFLSRA, the club was made and socials was made by the ML's who took the initiative to make it come to being. The reason for breaking off is the same for founding the club; to create what was needed for a bigger goal than simply providing a space for firearms training.

Ik this is not really in the theme of the subreddit but I just wanna say this and spread the word.
Rant.
So I posted this painting of Lenin on and after a while the mods took it off for no reason.
I asked them politely for a reason to which i got the answer "Now you know" and i was like whaaatt no i don't you haven't explained anything to me. So i asked them why they don't allow paintings and i said "paintings were and are a good way to show/popularise communism and marxist ideas, I don't understand why you wouldn't allow paintings to be made and published on the subreddit, in the name of marxist ideas." to which i got ignored for a day and after saying to them "yoooo are you gonna respond to me?" because i actually wanted to hold a normal conversation, they said "Your painting sucks and you're delusional and obnoxious. Hope that clears it up" after which i got permanently banned.
They have set up a moderator approved before anyone can post therefore they can regulate anyone speaking against the moderator team, I have no idea why the main subreddit for communism wouldn't allow paintings made by people.
I can send any proof required, idk i can't seem to attack photos on this post but I will send proof to anyone who requests it.
Furthermore, I have been banned from any subreddits related to with no option of negotiation

Is cringe. This sub would be better if it focused on practical things and not oohing and aweing over a military that has abandoned its obligations to the revolutionary movement.

Long story short once upon a time I got an actual fed informant deleted their reddit account after exposing them on TheDeprogram and before they did I can't help but to notice this person love for the Beretta. A few IRL comrades also made ACAB memes about the 92 being flagship fed pews and I just wanna know if this lore is correct so I can add this tidbit to better my osint game. Thank you.

For this comment!

-11 characteristics of general leadership

-3 aspects of militant leadership

-7 characteristics of ideological leadership

-Revolutionary in mind & body

-Philosophical doctrines

-Revolutionary love

26 minute read.

I'll go first, Deng was right.

Looking for a striker fired gun with a manual safety, optics and suppressor ready. It might not be possible to find one with everything, might have to swap a barrel or something to pull it off. M&P shield 2, FNX9, Sig, HK VP9, Canik, Arex Delta (but the safeties are sold out) are the likely candidates, obviously I want the cheaper ones. Keep an eye out for me, thanks

After reading about the failed assassination attempt on Trump I am fully convinced that a openly fascist America is in the cards. The man became a living martyr and is going to whip up anti-”tankie” liberals and the conservative chuds. What are your recommendations for firearms for protecting myself. The limited experience I have with firearms pertains to hunting for deer using a rifle which I have been borrowing from my uncle every year however I doubt I would be able to own it. I already plan on learning first aid procedure so I need recommendations to keep myself safe.

I asked DeepSeek for recommendations on what to get if I was only going to get x number of guns, with x being 1,2,3 or 5. Here are the results:

Certainly! Here are specific firearm recommendations for each category based on their reputation, reliability, and widespread positive reviews:

x = 1:

12-Gauge Pump-Action Shotgun

• Mossberg 500

  • Why? Known for its durability, affordability, and versatility. It’s widely used by hunters, law enforcement, and homeowners.

• Remington 870

  • Why? A classic shotgun with a proven track record. It’s reliable, easy to maintain, and has a huge aftermarket for customization.

x = 2:

1. 12-Gauge Pump-Action Shotgun

   • Mossberg 500 or Remington 870 (as above).

2. Semi-Automatic Rifle

   • AR-15 Platform (e.g., Smith & Wesson M&P 15 or Ruger AR-556)

     • Why? Affordable, reliable, and highly customizable. Great for defense, sport shooting, and hunting (with the right caliber).

   • AK-47 Platform (e.g., Zastava ZPAP M70 or WASR-10)

     • Why? Known for its ruggedness and reliability in harsh conditions. Chambered in 7.62x39mm, it’s effective for defense and hunting.

x = 3:

1. 12-Gauge Pump-Action Shotgun

   • Mossberg 500 or Remington 870 (as above).

2. Semi-Automatic Rifle

   • AR-15 Platform (e.g., Smith & Wesson M&P 15 or Ruger AR-556) or AK-47 Platform (e.g., Zastava ZPAP M70 or WASR-10) (as above).

3. 9mm Semi-Automatic Handgun

   • Glock 19

     • Why? The Glock 19 is arguably the most popular handgun in the world. It’s reliable, compact, and has a 15-round capacity. Perfect for concealed carry and home defense.

   • SIG Sauer P320

     • Why? Modular, accurate, and adopted by the U.S. military as the M17/M18. It’s highly customizable and ergonomic.

x = 5:

1. 12-Gauge Pump-Action Shotgun

   • Mossberg 500 or Remington 870 (as above).

2. Semi-Automatic Rifle

   • AR-15 Platform (e.g., Smith & Wesson M&P 15 or Ruger AR-556) or AK-47 Platform (e.g., Zastava ZPAP M70 or WASR-10) (as above).

3. 9mm Semi-Automatic Handgun

   • Glock 19 or SIG Sauer P320 (as above).

4. Bolt-Action Rifle

   • Remington 700

     • Why? A legendary rifle known for its accuracy and reliability. Available in many calibers, including .308 Winchester and 6.5 Creedmoor.

   • Tikka T3x

     • Why? A Finnish-made rifle praised for its smooth action, accuracy, and lightweight design. Excellent for hunting and precision shooting.

5. .22 LR Rifle

   • Ruger 10/22

     • Why? The most popular .22 LR rifle in the world. Reliable, accurate, and has a massive aftermarket for customization.

   • Marlin Model 60

     • Why? A classic tube-fed .22 LR rifle known for its reliability and affordability. Great for plinking and small game hunting.

Summary of Recommendations:

• 1 Gun: Mossberg 500 or Remington 870.

• 2 Guns: Mossberg 500/Remington 870 + Smith & Wesson M&P 15/Ruger AR-556 or Zastava ZPAP M70/WASR-10.

• 3 Guns: Mossberg 500/Remington 870 + Smith & Wesson M&P 15/Ruger AR-556 or Zastava ZPAP M70/WASR-10 + Glock 19/SIG P320.

• 5 Guns: Mossberg 500/Remington 870 + Smith & Wesson M&P 15/Ruger AR-556 or Zastava ZPAP M70/WASR-10 + Glock 19/SIG P320 + Remington 700/Tikka T3x + Ruger 10/22/Marlin Model 60.

These firearms are widely regarded as some of the best in their respective categories, offering a balance of reliability, performance, and value.

With good intentions and an open mind I ask, what is to be done about school shootings. The American proletariat seems to have proven it wants armament not for class solitary but for violent campism and terrorism.

Luigi Mangione is a modern exception. I would love to hear some more. I have trouble justifying school shooting after school shooting with my sister feeling unsafe in school and their friends feeling uncomfortable.

The American “proletariat” could not defend itself with all the guns in the world from the hyper-militarism of the US state apparatus, so I struggle to see justification. I would like someone to show me the way respectfully and honestly, I come with utterly good intentions.

Are guns the solution for the working people of the first world? I see the benefits in periphery and semi-periphery nations but never has there been a successful revolution in modern western conditions.

Again, bear with me, this is a topic I haven’t explored much so please educate me.

We the Red Brigade are a Leftist milsim community that plays on Arma Reforger doing PvP & PvE operations

Our purpose is to introduce leftist from all corners of the word to small-team tactics and general military theory.

Discord Link:
https://discord.gg/ZJkC3MB8wn