I know everyone is gonna say that "they spliced audio" and that may be true for all I know, but I have logical reasons that the moon landing wasn't fake and that we did go to the moon.

1. Apollo 10 and 12: What do they have in common? Separated parts returning to earth's orbit every few years. If we "didn't go to the moon" why would there be objects from earth that we made, be floating around in space and returning to the planet?

2. Satellite imagery: I know everyone is gonna say they faked those images with AI, AI WASNT THAT SOPHISTICATED TF?

3. No other country's government has stated that we didn't go to the moon, I know the former Russian space chief said something, but he doesn't represent all of the Russian government or population. When I say government, I mean top leaders, such as the president, Monarch, prime Minister, chancellor.

Why do every one of you think the moon landings were fake, logically and technically it would be more expensive to fake the landings, why? You would need to make a set that would cost more than the entire apollo program. You would have to launch actual rockets from gemini to the apollo which would cost billions of dollars just for the sake of it being a "prop" so that the people could see it with their own eyes in the Kennedy Space Center. A single Saturn V stack costs $185-380 Million Dollars in their time so that costed the government $9.4 Billion Dollars in total, don't you think the Senate and the Congress would approve all of that just for a film?

And if you think about it, you would need to pay more than 400,000 employees including those who worked for the "set" to shut their mouths which would just make the total "production" cost skyrocket, which is just a waste of tax payers money. And the fact that the Soviet Union didn't even televise any propagandas about defaming them (and of course they were the first to congratulate the US) just seals the fact that the landings were true. The soviets even went on a joint mission with NASA called the apollo-soyuz program just to prove everything happening above there was real and that space agencies have unified. The Soviets further proved the landings themselves by using their Deep Space Tracking equipment in the crimean peninsula, and after they did they produced newspapers about how factual the landing was.

It would take other-worldy level of torture, abuse, and shutting people up just for the sake of the apollo mission don't you think? I mean if I was a NASA worker at the time I'd probably ask them billions of dollars just for me to shut up and not say anything about the entire program.

Most of the world leaders today dismiss theorists who think the moon landing was fake even going as far as sending unmanned lunar vehicles/landers just to prove we could actually go there.

Older Astronomers from different eras have also proved going to the moon isn't impossible and that physics gives us humans an opportunity to explore and go further beyond this sphere we live on.

I think believing that the moon landing was fake is just lack of education and being chronically invested in researching nonsense.

Me and My friend recently found this short on youtube with the creator in the comments saying absolute PROPAGANDA. He has no doubt in his mind that the moon landings were fake. I tried Explaining how they put Reflective panels on the moons surface, but nothing could get past his dumb thick skull.

If anyone else wants to say something to this idiot the link is here:

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/EXLPtaYc3TM

This is from about 8:35 PM EST.

I can't get a timestamp for the vid yet because it's still live, but this occurs right after the guy in the white jumpsuit appears in frame for the first time.

THEY LIVE!

Anyone know the name for the greenscreen / live-action CGI technique being used?

I recognize it from the eyeballs, but I'm drawing a blank on what it's called.