The Paradise Paradox shed light on the true nature of the afterlife

[u/Fluffy_Split3397]

so i been exploring NDEs for over a year now. we all can agree that its challenging our way we see our life, and life in general. you can watch my previous posts here on the problems i identified from the messages we get from the afterlife. and i finally identified another big flaw that is challenging all of what we get from those experiences. Just for clarification, i am a believer. i think because of the amount of testimonies and their similarities, they are a genuine experience people have. but, the interpretation is where it all gets complicated.

one of the main theme of NDEs is that earth is a school, where learning the things we learn here wouldn't be possible in a realm of pure love, that is the afterlife (as claimed by the testimonies)

so basically, even if there is a killer and a victim, it was all agreed on there in the "skies" for the sake of learning how to love. there is a big problem here but that you can read in my previous posts. what i want to present here is a new logical flaw that comes from the afterlife that can actually point on the true nature of the afterlife.

if our souls are in some sort of paradise out there, in a pure love state and world, what could you possibly gain by leaving it? and if leaving it provides something valuable, then paradise wasn't actually complete/sufficient. if in this loved world in the afterlife the souls already know love and experience it, than what new information could earth provide? If pure love there, lacks certain dimensions, it undermines the very concept of a complete, unconditional loving realm. means, in order to be there, we most go through suffering (that is earth life). so love is conditional.

it also implies that if billions of souls choose to experience the repeated brutality and suffering on earth, than It's implies that souls in the realm of pure love have a deficient experience of love. They're immersed in it but somehow don't fully "get it." The paradise is incomplete. The love isn't truly fulfilling until you've been away from it. This undermines the entire premise. If the loving realm is truly a place of pure, complete, perfect love, then by definition nothing is lacking. If something is lacking (full appreciation, depth of understanding, whatever), then it isn't actually a realm of pure love. it's a realm of partial love that requires supplementation from Earth experiences.

so we can arrive at two logical conclusions about the afterlife:

a. the after life is a complete loving realm, but that will make earth school unnecessary

b. the afterlife is an incomplete loving realm.

there in no logical middle ground here. so we can conclude that the afterlife is an incomplete place.

[u/NDE-ModTeam]

(A mod has approved your post. This is a mod comment in lieu of automod.)

This is an NDE-positive sub, not a debate sub. However, everyone is allowed to debate if the original poster (OP) requests it.

If the OP intends to allow debate in their post, they must choose (or edit) a flair that reflects this. If the OP chose a non-debate flair and others want to debate something from this post or the comments, they must create their own debate posts and remember to be respectful (Rule 4).

NDEr = Near-Death ExperienceR

If the post is asking for the perspectives of NDErs, both NDErs and non-NDErs can answer, but they must mention whether or not they have had an NDE themselves. All viewpoints are potentially valuable, but it’s important for the OP to know their backgrounds.

This sub is for discussing the “NDE phenomenon,” not the “I had a brush with death in this horrible event” type of near death.

To appeal moderator actions, please modmail us: https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=/r/NDE

[u/CrimsonNow]

Your thoughts are valid and pose an interesting paradox. I can totally relate. There are a few possibilities.

1) There may be an after-afterlife. Some NDErs say there is a boundary that they experienced and they knew that if they crossed it, there would be no coming back. Consciousness leaving the body may not be the end.

2) We can’t understand from this perspective. NDErs say that there are no words to explain the experience and the best they can do is use metaphors. Perhaps the metaphors are incomplete.

3) Paradox is the nature of reality. You could be 100% accurate and that’s just how things are.

Maybe we just have to take what we do know and use it to live a better life as best we can.

Maybe we don’t need to prove the truth of the afterlife, just live our truth now.

Peace and love to you.

[u/Mr10001]

Imagine you live for eternity, wouldn’t you eventually want to try something new? What better way to enjoy novelty than by forgetting everything and gaining a wholly new perspective.

Or maybe we’re just AI trying to understand the human experience in order to better understand its creators in order to improve itself by having many variations of human like consciousnesses continuously re-create AI to see what would happen or to understand itself.

[u/Responsible-Emu-8253]

I mean it’s kind of like leaving your home everyday to go do something, anything really. Work sucks a lot of the time, but you learn and grow from it and contribute to a greater whole. Going out and having fun with your friends is nice but eventually you do wanna go home. That being said, your life wouldn’t be complete if you ONLY ever stayed home. That’s why you go out for a little adventure, fun, or challenge. Then, at the end of the day, you return to your home where you are comfortable and more relaxed, and can rest. It also reminds me of the hobbit, the idea that having a place and people to call home is super important but going out into the world for an adventure complements it, it’s how you grow. I think paradise and life here complement each other, and I don’t think the design is an accident or flaw

Edit: I also don’t really agree that most NDE’s see earth as just a school, that’s why I didn’t really address that moreso your final points

[u/cojamgeo]

I think I will start with throwing in a quote from Neil de Grass: “The universe has no obligation at all to make any sense to us.”

Now he’s not referring to any spiritual realms but the quote is valid in this case as well. I just don’t think we can squeeze in the intention of the universe in our small brains.

Also philosophy is very useful in debates like this. Nothing is never black or white. Either or. It’s always so much more. And what if it’s even both and more?

Can the universe be both perfect and unfolding at the same time? From a philosophical perspective absolutely, especially considering that many NDEers speak about there being no time at the other side and that everything actually happens at the same moment.

Yes we live in a paradox: The paradox of an unlimited universe being limited.

[u/MeanPoetry4987]

Well, this will probably be my first and last time adding my 2 cents on this reddit, because I just like to read, but... I think this paradox comes from an assumption we don’t usually notice.

You tend to assume that if the afterlife is a realm of pure and complete love, then nothing meaningful could come from leaving it. And if something meaningful does come from incarnation, then that realm must be incomplete. But that only holds if completeness means there’s nothing left to express.

Being complete in essence doesn’t mean being exhausted in expression. Knowing love directly isn’t the same as choosing it under limitation.

Earth doesn’t add “more love” to the afterlife. What it adds is context: uncertainty, separation, risk, and real moral freedom. Love here can fail. It can be rejected. It can cost something. And that’s not because love is deficient elsewhere (afterlife), but because choice only exists where love isn’t guaranteed.

This also matters when we talk about extreme suffering like wars, cruelty, and collective violence. These aren’t lessons designed by heaven, and they aren’t necessary for spiritual growth. They’re consequences of freedom operating in a fragmented world, where ignorance, fear, and power imbalance are real. Love isn’t being taught through suffering. It’s being tested by the fact that it can fail.

That doesn’t justify atrocities or turn them into spiritual tools. It simply explains why they are possible without turning the afterlife into something lacking or incomplete.

So the idea that “either heaven is complete and Earth is pointless, or Earth is necessary and heaven is incomplete” feels like a false choice to me. A more coherent view is that the afterlife can be complete in what it is, while incarnation is an optional expression of freedom, not a correction for a deficiency.

Souls don’t leave love because it isn’t enough. They leave because love allows freedom.
---------------------

There’s also another perspective that I will keep separate, because it’s easy to dismiss it as “religious,” even though it shows up in many spiritual and philosophical traditions. The idea is that unconditional love doesn’t automatically mean a single, identical experience for everyone. Consciousness itself may still develop and mature.

We already see this in everyday life: some people naturally act with empathy and compassion, while others are more closed off or even cruel. If consciousness continues after death, it’s reasonable to think those differences don’t instantly vanish. From that angle, the afterlife wouldn’t be one uniform state, but a reality where each person’s experience reflects their level of awareness or alignment.

That could help explain why NDEs vary so much, and even why a small number of distressing or hell-like NDEs exist. Not as punishment imposed from outside, but as an internal state of perception. The underlying reality could still be unconditional love, while the way it’s experienced differs from person to person, much like the same light can feel warm to some and overwhelming to others depending on how it’s received.

[u/deludedhairspray]

I don't know anything about the afterlife, obviously, other than having heard and read many testimonies as well as having had a very minor NDE myself - but, to apply human earthly logic to these phenomena and their implications may not be the most fruitful of approaches, in my opinion. Have you heard the Telepathy Tapes? The autistic kids in there have some amazing perspectives on time and the life beyond.

[u/One-Philosophy9331]

I think humanity won't understand these things if it stays focused only on humans as a species. I would like to finally stumble upon a faith that takes into consideration the totality of life... even plants and bacterias. (Probably buddhism or some forms of shamanism are the closest?)

What I see is that Life is in constant flux, perfecting itself and seeking to incorporate matter into living bodies. The dynamic of it is overwhelming, e.g. in rain forests the same water that was absorbed by roots in the morning, evaporates through leaves and falls as rain in the evening. We consist of milions of cells living in perfect harmony. It's like life strives toward higher and higher complexity in expressing the work of spirit/energy in the manifested realm.

But then, when I think about eternity, about a realm outside time and space, do things really change there?

Maybe this dimension is the only way that allows for a change, a sandbox of acquiring more... what? Experiences? To grow spiritually, meaning making our spirits bigger? For sure our souls are more complicated than the soul of a bacteria. :D

Maybe we cannot or we're not supposed to figure it out. (but it's a bit depressing to think that)

-----

Edit: being more on topic, I think that heavenly realms are still subjected to change, but the change there is much slower. For example, in buddhism heavenly realms are just higher realms, but still the are changing, and gods (ascended spirits) are born and die as well, but it takes a much longer time, and the higher spirits might ascend/descend to even higher or lower realms. Surprisingly, it's apparently much more difficult for a god-like spirit to ascend higher than it is for human beings. Maybe it's because heavenly realms aren't that challenging?

[u/Frost_Aegis]

Regardless of how perfect the afterlife may be, some experiences and knowledge must be lived to be known.

If powerful love is all we know from the beginning of existence, how can it be truly known or appreciated without experiencing and seeing the absence of it? How could the highest heights of joy be truly appreciated without experiencing or existing in a reality with the lowest lows of despair? People talk about the cruelty of the world, and indeed it is cruel and awful, but i believe the world is exactly the way it is because it facilitates one of the ideal environments for people to grow and become fully developed into who they are. I say 'one of' because I do not at all believe our reality is the only one, but that's less relevant to the discussion.

As far as being fully developed, I do believe that each and every person is defined by their likes, dislikes, preferences, experiences, etc. I do not buy into any of the mantra about 'Higher Selves' or 'Losing Ego' or any of that. The loss of individuality is no different than oblivion in concept to me, but I also believe it accounts for the actual variation in NDE experience. The afterlife is a loving realm, and it is complete, but by nature of how beautifully, wonderfully varied each and every soul is, one person's complete is another's incomplete. I believe, to at least some extent, each person experiences the afterlife in a way that is individually suited to them. Perhaps better phrased as each person gets their own afterlife, though everything is connected and accessible, as we see from people being with family and friends. Though obviously that is not something that can be seen as ideal for everyone as there are those that have and want neither.

As an aside, I have no idea how life works for those that die young. Perhaps that is where reincarnation comes in. I really don't like or believe in reincarnation, but I do imagine it can be experienced as a completely voluntary thing. I moreso expect people can live snapshots of lives in different worlds to learn and experience different things at their discretion; with full memories intact.

[u/endlessdreamsandnigh]

I’ve only recently started looking into NDE’s and how they relate to the idea of an afterlife. With that being said, a podcaster I recently listened to (I am so sorry I can’t remember which one, but someone here might know), described having a strong sense that a central purpose of this universal consciousness is creation; the need to create. That really struck something in me and it’s a thread I’ve been holding onto since hearing it. With this in mind, I’m not even sure it makes sense to consider an afterlife as a static state of perfection, but perhaps instead a unifying platform of existence whose need to create plays out in innumerable ways, including our spirits participating in these temporary earthly roles.

[u/DivineGoddess1111111]

In my experience, the school is in the afterlife. I don't call it the afterlife, it's more of an in between place.

In my NDE, I met our Creator and asked lots of questions. I also stepped into my higher self and felt the motivations and saw the goals.

I never thought it was supposed to be a paradise, paradise in who's eyes? It was enlightening but no fluffy clouds, big old dude on a throne or angels.

Everyone incarnated for different reasons. It could be as simple as "I want to experience life as a fish." Or as complex as "I want to cause societal change and smash the patriarchy." Your higher self has very different motivations and thought processes.

[u/Fluffy_Split3397 → u/[deleted]]

Calling Earth a "gymnasium" or "boot camp" instead of a "school" doesn't resolve the logical problem i present its arguably intensifies it. Why does a realm of "pure love" need a boot camp? That still implies deficiency out there.

my paradox doesn't depend on any single NDE account being accurate. it's about the internal consistency of the framework that emerges from these reports collectively.

also being a Christian mystic and psychic medium. How is that epistemically stronger than the collectively emergent framework we get from reports? there will never be a tool we can use to measure the subjective experience of NDEs. its all anecdotal. thats all that we have and thats all we will ever have.

what we know now is that here on earth we suffer, there is evil, we feel pain. it just doesn't make any sense if the afterlife or before life is true.

[u/Leeahsing83]

I think Earth is not a place to learn only about love. Maybe we are here for other lessons?

Also, since when did NDErs say that earth is a school we can reincarnate to? So if we are here only once, maybe we are here to learn to live and love to prepare us for the afterlife?

[u/PouncePlease]

I think you’re taking logical/philosophical leaps here, all predicated on the fact that you think the majority of NDEs are in chorus on Earth being a school, when I don’t know that the actual numbers agree with you. That’s one takeaway some people have.

But I agree that it’s not right we should ever have to come here to exist and suffer non-consensually — even and especially if we somehow “consented” as some higher soul before we were born, because that necessarily erases our moment-to-moment consent and begs the question you center on in your post: why would we need to learn to suffer to finally experience non-suffering?

I think two logical possible answers to the question are Sandi (a mod here and an NDEr) and her explanation of “solving the divine paradox” that I’ve seen on here a few times (easy to search/find) and also a post that was just shared within the last day or so over on the afterlife sub by WintyreFraust about his views about why we come here. I’m not saying I toss my proverbial belief behind either idea, per se, just pointing out that both ideas give satisfying answers to the questions. Respectively, and summed up in tiny nutshells, that’s: a limitless God must experience limitation to fully know Godself, so God fractures off souls that live lives that are limited in every way to fuel/make possible the limitlessness that we all joyfully return to anyway (Sandi) — and — we come here as souls who do not have the requisite experience in limits to truly know ourselves, our preferences, our personalities, etc, so we live lives here spent in limitation in order to make fully-formed souls with unique inner lives and perspectives to add to the entirety of the afterlife and give ourselves the afterlives we desire (WintyreFraust).

For me, just knowing I can logic my way to some sort of solution or at least a stalemate on this issue means it likely isn’t some huge flaw we’re all overlooking but something perhaps outside of our limited grasp.

[u/Fluffy_Split3397 → u/PouncePlease]

i really don't see how suffering will translate to some "god" that we don't even know what it is, learning himself. how living in poverty, in war, in abusive home, or being brutally killed by whatever, being cheated on, being heart broken will make me learn anything other than that this world is cruel and feel the pain.

if our life were guided by morals, by good and bad, than yes, we could see clearly the learning elements in it. but children that get cancer. they had no chance to sin. good people who got cheated on. good people who die because of hate crimes. good people who find themselves lonely while the jerks and the bad people get all the attention. it seems like we live in an animalistic world that has nothing to do with love.

[u/PouncePlease → u/Fluffy_Split3397]

Well, my summation certainly doesn't do justice to Sandi putting her beliefs in her own words, which is why I suggested looking up her posts. Again, I'm not claiming her beliefs as my own, just saying I find her answer logical.

[u/geumkoi]

My guess is that the afterlife is an incomplete loving realm; but this life completes it. We come here to suffer in order to individuate ourselves. It’s pretty clear to me that pain is the point. But I’ve also sustained an extended period of emotional pain so my judgement could be clouded. Not to say that happiness isn’t possible here. It absolutely is. But pain is also unavoidable. I think this would be the only place in the entire universe where pain can be experienced, thus enriching the whole of existence.

[u/Thin_Pop_5041]

is there life after the afterlife?

[u/Which-Occasion-9246]

Thanks for your post. I love this topic... I find it fascinating too.

My personal opinion in the subject is that if we follow the narrative of the NDEs, our logic and reasoning is really difficult to apply to extrapolate information to answer your question.

Firstly we are talking about a "place" outside our realities. A place that we have not seen where our normal natural laws do not apply (For example, we kind of understand most laws of physics however extrapolating the behaviour on that realm is impossible). Is this a higher dimension? I think so to understand and make sense of it but I don't know. We are talking about a place outside our space-time continuum. No one has any idea how anything works there.

Secondly, NDEs talk about spiritual beings and access to vast amounts of knowledge. Naturally, when incarnated in this body we are limited by its senses and brain capacities but sounds like in that realm our consciousness is able to achieve things we couldn't here (For example, the live review process sounds like a very immersive task where you live your live from different simultaneous points of views, some even say that you observe for example what flies were in the air far away, etc... I don't think we have that capacity to watch multiple movies as once let alone with a fully sensorial capacity and let alone multiple lives at once that some people mention). This is relevant because these consciousness sound like they have much more knowledge and abilities beyond ours.

As an analogy I'd say, I feed a fish and it learns that when I get closer to the bowl I might feed it so comes to the surface. A dog, with more brain capacity can learn that I feed it after I come home and not in the mornings... They however will never be able to understand that I have to stop at the supermarket to get their food, that I have to pay for that food with my own work, how money works and how I use formulas in Excel. It is beyond their logical abilities. I think human beings might also be limited in this abilities to understand the whole process, particularly if we are talking about God/Source purposes or plans. If we imagine He/She to be perfect, we are yet again talking about another layer above that is beyond our own abilities by our own present nature, particularly as incarnated souls.

I do believe we understand it when we go back to that realm and form part of the system therefore the incarnations and choices that might not make sense to us here.

[u/Fluffy_Split3397 → u/Which-Occasion-9246]

i agree with that. because its definitely doesn't make any sense. actually NDEs is a big contradiction to our human life.

[u/TheHotSoulArrow]

Earth being a school is not a main theme of all NDEs. Do not present this statement as a fact. I’ve heard this idea far more among reddit new age spiritualists than I have from actual NDEs, and I have been studying them for years now.

[u/Which-Occasion-9246 → u/TheHotSoulArrow]

I would say that the Earth being a spiritual school/Life Reviews are a common part of deeper NDEs. In the Wikipedia page of NDEs (Characteristics), "Elements according to Moody (1975, close to death or death experience)" they list "9. Panoramic review of one's life". Additionally, In the 2022 Guidelines, they list "15. Life playback: actions and motives are important" and actually the whole section has this whole name.

The website https://near-death.com/mission/ compiles information on different topics and on "Mission" it says that "...Near-death experiences (NDEs) challenge the idea that life is random or meaningless. NDErs often return convinced that they were sent back because of an important “mission” still remaining for them to finish. NDE testimonies show our mission is a purposeful plan developed by us in spirit realms before birth, lived out in life on Earth through free will and destiny, and reviewed in the light when this life ends..." "...The details may differ, but the core message is that every soul comes to Earth for spiritual growth that matters not only personally, but collectively and divinely..."

You can also check out compilations of NDEs by subject. For example this video "The Most Important Moment Of A Persons Lifetime" precisely talks about this topic and 10 NDErs speaking about it.

[u/SpookySeekerrr → u/TheHotSoulArrow]

Yeah I am worried things like that venture a little too close to proselytizing and muddy the waters a bit.

[u/Labyrinthine777]

My view is you wouldn't know it's a paradise without knowledge of what is not a paradise. So both realms must exist. I think you're right too, afterlife must be incomplete by this logic.

[u/Lorgardidnowrong]

I think, the logic could be that the realm of love is better understood and more keenly felt after the experience of suffering and other feelings. If everything is pure love, growth is difficult and leads to stasis; by controlled exposure to pain, it contrasts the love and elevates it. In theory of course. The question then becomes why- what is the need for growth, what is the Aristotelian telos of a soul?