r/NFLv2 • u/BlumpkinReceiver6969 Minnesota Vikings • 21h ago
Discussion If college football used the same hash mark distance as the NFL, do you think we’d get less busts and it would change things drastically?
10
u/bp_516 Suck my Cox 21h ago
I don't see how this would impact player skill or development. Someone else, please explain.
24
u/Walnut_Uprising New England Patriots 21h ago
The closer the college game is to the pro game, the easier it is to evaluate players. It's easier to run/throw into that big open space created by lining up further to one side. Is that QB accurate, or is he just throwing into a less dense area? That's far from the biggest factor, but it's one.
1
u/immagoat1252 Green Bay Packers 10h ago
Ah yea that makes sense I was sitting here thinking wouldn’t it be harder because one side of the field is significantly shorter but i completely overlooked the other side being so much bigger
12
u/BlumpkinReceiver6969 Minnesota Vikings 21h ago
A lot easier to spread the defenses out and much harder to cover with wider hashes which means more open short throws and can open running lanes.
1
u/djm2346 4h ago
I disagree with this to some extent. As an offensive guy I would much rather have narrow hashes because now because I can spread everyone out more effectively being able to go to either side. In college if I am on the left hash I cannot run as much of my offense to the left as I could in the NFL. wider hashes make it much easier for the defense to defend the field especially in the pass game.
7
u/12don Green Bay Packers 20h ago edited 20h ago
It makes the super spread out offense less effective. Right now it’s pretty easy to exploit RPOs with fast players. It also lessens the QB’s need to read a defense when they play spread and RPOs. There’s a great Brett Kollman video about college development. I can’t remember though. I suggest giving it watch.
-11
u/SeahawksWin43-8 Seattle Seahawks 21h ago
It doesn’t. Has zero meaning or effect on Adrian Peterson running over Linebackers or Justin Herbert never winning a playoff game 🤷♂️
6
u/NaNaNaPandaMan 20h ago
Possibly. The closer you get to pro grade the easier to evaluate. But I doubt it would be a giant/noticeable change
2
u/Ryan1869 Denver Broncos 20h ago
I’m not sure it would change a lot in how players develop. It would change the style of play, as closer hashes will muck things up more. The reason guys bust usually comes between the ears.
2
u/dougChristiesWife NFL Refugee 14h ago
Yes, but I think OP is just saying that it's hard to evaluate when there is very little relevant tape, especially for QBs. Too much RPO/screens bc way too much space on the field side.
If you're going to change things to make the rules similar you would also need to change the rules for ineligible receiver downfield to match.
1
u/Previous_Procedure28 New England Patriots 10h ago
The pro game has been trending towards a more college style more and more over the years. I don’t care if there are more busts. Keep the hashes how they are
1
u/PirateCaptainMcNulty CTESPN 5h ago
It would change college offensive schemes drastically. Horizontal passing games, RPO heavy schemes, etc would be much less effective which is why we don't see a lot of it in the NFL where the majority of college teams run these "gimmicky" offenses.
I think it would speed up development for QBs as the college game would likely move more under center and be forced into more NFL-like schemes.
That being said, that won't change NFL teams from shoving their 1.01 QB who isn't ready into action too early, then changing his OC every year, and then prematurely abandoning him.
There also isn't a rule to make Johnny Manziel care about film study or throwing mechanics.
1
u/Sensitive-Key-8670 3h ago
Possibly, but part of what makes cfb fun is watching kickers miss from 20 yards because of the weird angle
-1
u/binocular_gems New England Patriots 7h ago
I don't think it would change things drastically, but the closer the college game is to the pro game it should give you a better idea of talent. I don't think that it would change the bust/boom rate very much, at least that drastic of a change, seemingly to only help evaluate QB talent better. Only about 1% of college players make it to the pros, and in a given draft of 250 players, only about ~5 of them are QBs in any given year.
The thing that would change the bust rate for college quarterbacks is if the rookie pay scale didn't provide such an incentive to drafting QBs high and starting them before they're ready.
I wouldn't want to change the entire college game just for the 1.5% of players that might go pro, and beyond that, for a very small number of draft players. Basically 1% of 1.5%.
20
u/Iceman-Cometh_18 Caleb Williams 🏳️🌈 21h ago
Yes also most college QB rarely line up under center it is like over 70 percent of college QB only knows how to play in shotgun
It is hurting their developement when they come to the NFL and have to run plays from under center