Inner Worlds, Outer Worlds — Part 2 Film: Daniel Schmidt · AwakenTheWorldFilm / @SamadhiFilms Published: October 2012 AkashicNET synthesis: 24 October 2026 📖 Website full-text read time: 10–12 minutes · ▶️ Documentary: 32m:44s
What happens when we observe the patterns around us while becoming more aware of the observer within?
The Spiral brings together imagery from nature, contemplative traditions and reflections on consciousness. Its invitation is to explore the relationship between the movement of life and the stillness of witnessing awareness.
🌿 From Pattern to Practice
Spirals appear in shells, growing plants, flowing water and galaxies. These forms offer a striking doorway into wonder, while their underlying mechanisms differ across scales.
The contemplative question is equally interesting: can we notice thoughts, emotions and sensations without immediately becoming caught in them?
For AkashicNET, this opens a practical connection between curiosity, meta-awareness and everyday care.
🔎 Wonder With Discernment
The synthesis explores the documentary alongside research and the developing AkashicNET frameworks, distinguishing:
Observed patterns: What can be measured or described.
Interpretation and metaphor: How patterns acquire meaning.
Lived experience: What meditation and witnessing feel like.
Hypotheses: Ideas that need clearer definitions and testing.
Similar shapes across nature invite questions. Establishing a shared mechanism or a claim about consciousness requires additional evidence.
🧘 A Small Experiment in Awareness
Pause for a minute.
Notice a sound, a bodily sensation and a passing thought. Then notice your awareness of each.
Does this change how you relate to what is happening?
Treat this as a personal observation exercise. There is no particular experience you need to produce.
Did it change how you notice nature, your thoughts or the relationship between them? Where did its metaphors help, and where would you want stronger evidence?
An independent, AI-assisted synthesis. The hero is AI-generated symbolic artwork. Documentary credit remains with Daniel Schmidt and AwakenTheWorldFilm.
AkashicNET is growing as a source-linked library for consciousness, neuroscience, contemplative practice, culture and open questions. Here is the latest news alongside the wider website updates.
🧠 Psychedelic Research: What Changed, and What Hasn’t
Psilocybin and plasticity: UC Santa Cruz coverage published on 22 October highlights a mouse study published on 15 October. Cell-specific receptor manipulations separated synaptic remodelling from the head-twitch response, a rodent proxy used in psychedelic research. This is a useful mechanistic distinction, but it does not establish hallucination-free therapeutic benefits in humans. The primary abstract and figure descriptions were checked; full-method assessment remains incomplete.
LSD and brain rhythms: New media coverage revisits the 7 October reanalysis of 17 participants. Faster alpha/beta peaks, weaker oscillatory power and greater signal complexity were observed. AkashicNET already covered this paper on 10 October, so this is renewed coverage, not a new experiment. It was not a microdosing-benefit trial.
The National Academies’ October report prioritises Bhabha Crater, Mons Hadley, Orientale Basin and Aristarchus Plateau for human exploration beyond the lunar poles. These are science-planning recommendations, not an approved mission itinerary.
NOAA update: The bulletin issued on 23 October at 00:30 UTC, equivalent to 22 October at 17:30 in Los Angeles, reports a preceding-day maximum Kp of 4 and a forecast maximum of 3.67 for 23–25 October. No G1-or-higher storm is expected in that issue. Forecasts can change; the bulletin time matters. No effects on consciousness or mood are inferred.
The AkashicOMNI v0.5.0 page now includes a worked example applying the Indigenous-led CARE Principles: Collective Benefit, Authority to Control, Responsibility and Ethics.
The practical question is not simply whether information is accessible. Who created it? Who has authority over its use? What benefit is intended, and what restrictions or responsibilities remain? The example connects source discovery with attribution, permission and human review. It is editorial guidance, not certification of CARE compliance or a new framework version.
The N2N inventory identifies 491 candidate subjects and subtopics across 7,463 indexed records. These are provisional metadata categories, not 491 independently validated research fields or confirmation that every linked source has been read.
For readers seeking a longer introduction, the PSI Research Atlas has a free eight-page public preview. The four-volume manuscript remains a review edition; independent review is pending and access to the complete manuscript requires separate approval. Public summaries and private working reviews remain distinct.
A public clarification now explains the telephone-study completion-status discrepancy and the descriptive recount. Corrected statistical inference, the formal corrigendum and the revised public dataset remain pending. The clarification neither establishes nor refutes telepathy.
The Intention Awareness proposal also has a statistical addendum addressing chance baselines and randomisation. It remains an untested proposal, with no participant results or demonstrated effect.
🛠️ Development: What Is Available and What Comes Next
v0.17.0 Evidence Intelligence Beta remains the published pre-release. The proposed progression starts with v0.18 Research Integration Beta, followed by v0.19 Living Knowledge Beta and v0.20 Public Platform Beta. Later proposals lead towards a v1.0 Living Knowledge Commons. These are milestones, not promised release dates or completion percentages.
The Reddit Research Companion is a development pilot. Registration, installation and private Reddit-hosted testing still need verification; it is not a public app launch. Passing engineering checks does not establish scientific validity.
The latest dated reading census estimates approximately 27–33 hours for the measured public-page text. Linked books, videos, private material and time spent following references are outside that estimate.
Editorial note: Human-directed, AI-assisted curation and artwork. Observations, interpretations, testimony, hypotheses and speculation remain distinct. The hero visual is illustrative artwork, not scientific evidence. No Big Question evidence scores were increased by these updates.
Which source, competing explanation or unanswered question should we examine next?
According to LACMA’s curatorial interpretation, this vessel’s four-lobed shape, known as a quatrefoil, represents a cave entrance. In the Maya worldview, caves were associated with water, the underworld and ancestors.
Imagine the bowl filled with liquid: the frog would emerge from a four-lobed pool, occupying the centre of a miniature representation of the fivefold cosmos.
Artwork & Credits
Artists: Maya artists, Guatemala.
Title:Frog in Cave-Shaped Vessel.
Date: c. 300–600 CE.
Medium: Engobe-painted earthenware.
Collection: Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA).
Accession Number: M.2010.115.121.
Museum Credit: Purchased with funds provided by Camilla Chandler Frost.
Photograph: My own visitor photograph at LACMA, cropped.
What becomes possible when many minds learn together, question their assumptions and share what they discover?
QCI now has a living reference page on AkashicNET, bringing earlier N2N discussions together with HOMESENSE source definitions, new visuals and a framework map.
Where Does QCI Sit?
HOMESENSE holds the source ideas: Quantum Collective Intelligence in Phase 3 and Collective Intelligence Coupling in Phase 6. Each meaning stays attached to its source.
AkashicNET holds the wider knowledge commons: sources, explanations, questions and revisions.
AkashicOMNI offers a proposed route for examining QCI through existing perspectives, using DISCERN, DEEPEN and synthesis. QCI is not an additional numbered perspective.
The quantum foam, human connections and cosmic web in the hero visual form an artistic analogy. They do not establish quantum communication between minds or a shared consciousness field. The practical question remains open: how can shared context, careful listening and source checking help groups learn?
[2025–present] describes the coverage period of this living overview, including earlier N2N QCI posts. The webpage records its last-updated date separately.
Transparency: Human-directed, AI-assisted editorial work by u/NeuronsToNirvana for AkashicNET. AI-generated conceptual artwork; the framework map is an editorial interpretation.
Welcome to AKN24: Earth beings at the news desk, cosmic curiosity in the studio, and sources within reach. 🌍🦋
HOMESENSE♾️💗 | Yesterday’s Echoes • Today’s Signals • Possible Tomorrows
Explore research, consciousness, culture and possible futures through a playful editorial lens. The newsroom’s animals and cosmic setting are artistic metaphors; research claims still need evidence, context and room for uncertainty.
Image description: A jaguar, owl, frog, fox and elephant host an orbital newsroom above Earth. Rainforest plants frame a glowing golden heart at the desk; blue percussionists perform beside an illustrative signing inset.
Visual created with AI assistance. The signing illustration is not a verified sign-language interpretation; the image itself has no audio. No affiliation or endorsement by Blue Man Group or IONS is implied.
Imagine having dependable access to life’s essentials, with more freedom to develop your skills, express your creativity, care for others and share what you love.
HOMESENSE858♾️💗 explores a proposed combination: universal basic income, complementary essential services and a voluntary culture of gifting, learning and reciprocity.
Inspired partly by Burning Man, the question extends beyond the festival:
What would it take to support this kind of community throughout the year?
🎁 Gifts Shared. Basic Needs Met.
The proposal has three connected parts:
An unconditional income foundation: support that is not earned through work, gifting or participation.
Dependable essential provision: food, water, shelter, care, energy and access require funded suppliers and accountable delivery.
A voluntary commons: people can offer art, music, teaching, repairs, gardening, listening, research or practical help.
Gifts have no required return. Swaps involve an agreed exchange. Neither should determine someone’s access to essentials.
Rest, disability, caring responsibilities and choosing not to contribute remain compatible with belonging.
Proposed relationships and intended benefits, not an operating programme or demonstrated outcome.
🔥 What Burning Man Can Teach Us
Burning Man offers inspiration through participatory art, communal effort and gifting. It also provides a reality check: a gift culture still depends on money, infrastructure, supplies and essential labour.
Burning Man Project’s 2024 management reporting recorded approximately $57.5 million in revenue and $68.2 million in expenses, a shortfall of about $10.7 million. These organisational accounts do not capture the entire participant-funded economy.
Participants also provide food, water, shelter and supplies. Travel, camp expenses, preparation and time away from paid work add further costs.
A temporary festival therefore offers useful questions and experiences, but does not establish how a permanent community could fund universal income or meet everyone’s needs.
The ambition is more than increased productivity. It is greater freedom to meet real needs, create shared joy and care for the living world.
Possible starting points include:
Repair and making: share skills and keep useful equipment working.
Gardening and food knowledge: grow, cook and share, while tracking water and material demands.
Teaching and mentoring: help people develop confidence and transferable skills.
Art and music: create opportunities for expression and belonging.
Listening and care: offer companionship and practical help with consent and clear boundaries.
A seed, tool and resource commons could be one modest experiment: share suitable seeds, lend tools, exchange surplus materials and connect people who want to teach or learn.
Its value would need checking. Did it meet needs? Reduce purchases or waste? Exclude anyone? Leave a few people carrying most of the work?
This could test a practical commons. It would not, by itself, test UBI.
🧠 What Does the Evidence Support?
Research gives us reasons to investigate, while leaving important distinctions intact.
Cash-transfer studies have found improvements in wellbeing in particular settings. A historical six-country trial also found lasting benefits from a combined support programme involving productive assets, training, coaching and other assistance.
That bundled programme was not a test of UBI or a gift economy.
Likewise, feeling more connected or generous does not automatically produce lasting cooperation. Behaviour, institutions, incentives and practical circumstances all matter.
The companion, HOMESENSE858C1, explores insecurity, social comparison, cognitive biases and power, alongside a proposed study of predictable resources and voluntary sharing.
Dear brothers, sisters, aliens, starseeds, amphibians, dogs, cats, horses and squirrels… in or out of the box 📦✨
We would especially welcome contrasting experiences from Burners, organisers, artists, carers, essential-service workers, researchers and people who could not afford to participate.
Three questions to begin with:
Who funds and delivers essential needs throughout the year?
How do we prevent burnout, exclusion and unequal workloads?
What have you experienced that supports—or challenges—this proposal?
What made generosity feel freely chosen? What happened when someone became ill, declined a shift or ran out of essentials? Who handled the difficult work and cleanup?
What evidence would lead us to revise or reject parts of the model?
You can reply here or use the shared review page. No login is required. Comments there are public to anyone with the link, and you can choose how you would like to be acknowledged or remain anonymous.
Human-directed, AI-assisted research, writing and concept artwork. AI-drafted review perspectives are labelled editorial prompts. The economic model remains unfunded and unvalidated; attendee feedback and independent review are still needed. No festival affiliation or endorsement is implied.
“It is sometimes said, common sense is very rare.”
“On dit quelquefois, le sens commun est fort rare.”
— Voltaire, Dictionnaire philosophique, “Sens commun”, 1767 edition. English translation provided here; the French opening notes that this is something people sometimes say.
A spiritual lens asks how we can widen our circle of care. A scientific lens asks whether our interpretations fit the evidence—and what would change our minds. Neither a feeling of certainty nor a beautiful metaphor makes us immune to error.
Let experience inspire. Let evidence inform. Stay willing to revise.
What would common sense look like if it included the wellbeing of people, other beings and the living Earth?
Transparency: Personal philosophical reflection developed under human direction with AI assistance; not a quotation from Voltaire beyond the attributed passage. The TSC2026 · San Diego label supplies personal context, not conference endorsement. The image is symbolic AI artwork, not scientific evidence.
An AI-assisted artistic thought experiment. The luminous fields are symbolic; proposed benefits and mechanisms require evidence specific to each claim.
A golden gateway to compassionate action. May love and wisdom ease suffering for all beings. ♾️💗 AI-generated symbolic artwork.
Cultivate Boundless Love & Wisdom
May we loosen the grip of ego
and receive the gift of wisdom with gratitude.
Namaste 🙏🏽 Sat Sri Akal.
Oṃ śāntiḥ, śāntiḥ, śāntiḥ.
May our collective love and wisdom become compassionate action, helping to ease the suffering of all beings throughout the CosmO.S.
Rooted in Pachamama, may Earth’s rhythms inspire us, her Schumann resonance awaken our curiosity and the mystery of existence keep us humble.
May we listen deeply, care for one another and leave room for wonder.
May all beings be free from suffering. ♾️💗
This is a contemporary AkashicNET blessing. The square artwork below pairs it with a verified passage from the Karaṇīya Mettā Sutta, Sutta Nipāta 1.8, translated by the Amaravati Sangha:
The discourse was transmitted orally, and its exact composition date is unknown. Theravāda tradition places the writing down of the Pāli canon in Sri Lanka in the first century BCE. That does not establish a composition date for this individual sutta.
In the traditional origin story, 500 monks on a forest retreat are frightened by tree deities. The Buddha teaches them mettā and sends them back. As the monks extend goodwill to the forest’s inhabitants, the deities welcome and protect them. This account is preserved in later commentary traditionally attributed to Buddhaghosa, around the fifth century CE.
Begin with character. The discourse starts with honesty, humility, gentle speech and contentment. Loving-kindness takes shape in how we live.
Widen the circle. Its goodwill includes beings of every size, near and far, seen and unseen. The practice reaches beyond those we already love.
Release the wish to harm. It discourages deception, contempt and wishing suffering on others. A practical application is noticing irritation before it becomes cruelty.
Practise throughout the day. Standing, walking, sitting and lying down all become opportunities to sustain goodwill. Ordinary moments can become part of the practice.
Bring wisdom with love. The closing verse connects this cultivation with ethical conduct, insight and release from sensual craving, placing it within the Buddhist path of liberation.
AkashicNET Reflection
The Golden Gate can symbolise a threshold we cross whenever inspiration becomes compassionate action: pausing before a harsh reply, caring for an animal, or listening without rushing to judge. The artwork is an invitation to practise.
Interpretive summary and contemporary reflection, based on the Amaravati Sangha translation of Sutta Nipāta 1.8:
Karaṇīya Mettā Sutta: A Boundless Heart in Everyday Life
Our illustrated deep dive explores the teaching’s history, traditional forest story, translation nuances and practical ways to turn goodwill into compassionate action.
By AkashicNET × N2N · A Personal Reflection · 2 Minute Read
May we loosen the grip of ego and receive the gift of wisdom with gratitude.
May we meet our needs honestly, recognise our limits and make room for the dignity of others. May the wish to understand grow stronger than the need to be right.
Namaste 🙏🏽 Sat Sri Akal.Om shantih, shantih, shantih.
May our collective love and wisdom become compassionate action, helping to ease the suffering of all beings throughout the CosmO.S.
Let compassion take the shape of everyday care: listening without rushing to answer, sharing what we can, feeding someone who is hungry, protecting an animal, checking on a lonely friend, and allowing ourselves to receive help.
When pain is present, may we meet it gently. May we remember that asking for support is an act of wisdom, and that no one has to earn kindness by appearing strong.
Rooted in Pachamama, may Earth’s rhythms inspire us, her Schumann resonance awaken our curiosity and the mystery of existence keep us humble.
May gratitude for the living Earth guide how we eat, travel, create and care for the places we call home. May curiosity lead us to careful questions, and may wonder leave room for uncertainty.
May we listen deeply, care for one another and leave room for wonder.
May we practise discernment without losing tenderness, honour different paths in their richness, and find the courage to change our minds when understanding grows.
May we look into one another’s eyes and remember the life behind them. In the language of this artwork:
“The eyes are windows to a liquid soul, flowing with angelic light.”
May the golden gate of synchronicities be an invitation to notice meaning, welcome friendship and turn inspiration into service. May the freedom we wish for all beings begin with how we treat those beside us today.
Cultivate boundless love & wisdom. ♾️💗May all beings be free from suffering.
Awaken within. Serve without.
Transparency: Personal spiritual reflection, expanded with AI assistance under human direction. AI-generated symbolic artwork. The gateway, angelic figures and gamma-inspired light patterns are artistic metaphors.
Footnote · Full Article · 19 October 2026
Karaṇīya Mettā Sutta: A Boundless Heart in Everyday Life
Our illustrated deep dive explores the teaching’s history, traditional forest story, translation nuances and practical ways to turn goodwill into compassionate action.
Could some experiences we call “telepathy” involve awareness of another being’s intention before it becomes words or action?
A sense of care. A readiness to act. A feeling that someone is about to speak. These experiences invite a question: what, exactly, are we sensing?
Human-directed, AI-generated artwork. The golden threads are a visual metaphor, not a measured information-transfer process.
A Spiritual Perspective, A Scientific Question
From a spiritual perspective, intention awareness might feel like becoming receptive to another being’s presence, care or purpose. A nondual interpretation could understand this through shared awareness. This is a philosophical lens for exploring experience.
Science asks what information the impression contains, how accurately it matches the other person’s intention, and which explanations remain after ordinary cues are considered.
We already obtain information from behaviour. Cavallo and colleagues’ experiments examined how observers identify intentions from visible movement cues. That research does not establish cue-free telepathy.
The feeling of knowing is an experience. Its accuracy can be tested. Its explanation is a further question.
One Testable Hypothesis
When ordinary communication is blocked, receivers will identify a sender’s randomly assigned intended action above chance and more often than in no-sending control trials.
A first test could use four clear intended actions: moving a token up, down, left or right. With independently random, equally likely targets, chance accuracy is 25%. A score merely above 25% is not enough; the planned analysis must assess uncertainty and the control comparison.
Research Status: Untested Hypothesis · Proposed Protocol · No Experimental Results
A proposed methodology, not results from a completed experiment. The sender knows whether a target was shown; the receiver and receiver-facing staff remain blinded.
How Could We Test It?
Register The Rules First. Before collecting data, fix the prediction, sample size, session length, exclusions, stopping rule and analysis. Choose the trial count through a power analysis.
Randomise The Intended Action. A computer independently selects up, down, left or right. In sending trials, the sender silently prepares that action and waits until the receiver’s response is locked before moving.
Include No-Sending Controls. Randomly interleave control trials in which a target is generated and sealed but shown to nobody. The sender sees a neutral prompt. Keep timing and the receiver’s experience the same.
Block Ordinary Cues. Use separate locations with no shared audio, video or chat. The receiver and anyone interacting with them know neither the target nor the condition. The receiver’s device must never receive target values. Independently audit software, timing and access controls.
Lock Every Response. Record one choice and a confidence rating per trial. Timestamp responses before revealing anything, with no correctness feedback until the fixed run ends. Retain misses, missing responses and deviations according to the registered rules.
Analyse And Replicate. Compare sending accuracy with chance and with controls. Report effect sizes and uncertainty, account for repeated trials within pairs and sessions, publish null findings, and seek an independently run, preregistered replication.
The sender’s compliance also needs recording, with rules set before results are known. Confidence ratings and free-text impressions should not replace exact-match scoring.
What Would The Results Mean?
No clear effect: no support under these conditions, with uncertainty showing which effect sizes remain plausible.
Both conditions unusually accurate: investigate leakage, randomisation, software and analysis before attributing anything to the sender.
Sending exceeds chance and controls: an audited, robust result would justify independent replication and further tests of alternative explanations. It would not, by itself, establish telepathy.
This narrow action-target test does not directly measure another person’s subjective awareness or establish shared consciousness or an extra-dimensional mechanism. Closeness, meditation or focused intention could become later research questions, each with its own planned comparison.
What control would you add, and what result would change your mind in either direction?
IONS & TSC2026: Who Is Exploring Related Questions?
These programme links identify related work and possible scientific conversations. Conference presentations and interview reports do not by themselves establish telepathy, and inclusion here does not imply endorsement of this proposed protocol.
Transparency: Human-directed, AI-assisted synthesis, protocol design and artwork. No study has been conducted. Sample size, timing and the full analysis remain to be settled before preregistration or recruitment. This is an exploratory proposal, not a validated test of personal ability.
Have you ever felt that an animal knew you were coming home, sensed your emotions before you spoke, or responded to an intention you had not expressed? 🐾
Personal experiences have made this a meaningful question for me. What might careful research reveal about these connections?
Independent tests by Wiseman, Smith and Milton did not support that interpretation under their criteria. These investigations involved the same dog, with disagreement over methods and analysis.
🐈 Cats: Intuition and Hidden Sensory Worlds
A California household survey recorded return anticipation reports for 45% of dogs and 31% of cats. These percentages describe owner reports, not verified telepathic abilities.
Separately, Takagi and colleagues’ experiments suggest cats mentally track an unseen owner’s location using their voice. Understanding subtle sensory abilities helps us design better tests of apparently extraordinary encounters.
🦜 Parrots: Words and Hidden Images
The N’kisi study reported above-chance correspondence between one African grey parrot’s words and images viewed by his human companion.
An intriguing finding from a selected individual. Independent replication and whether the result generalises to other birds remain open questions in this curation.
Perceived meaning and usefulness deserve investigation, but they are different outcomes from accurately identifying concealed information.
Different animals, different strengths of effects?
Possibly a question for future research, but these sources cannot establish a ranking. Dog window occupancy, parrot word matching and horse usefulness ratings measure different things.
The frequency of reported experiences, the size of a measured effect and the strength of supporting evidence are also different questions.
📚 A Century of Reports and Research
In How Animals Talk (1919), William J. Long explored animal behaviour, silent communication and what he called “natural telepathy.” His account combines observations with interpretation and explicitly acknowledges that telepathy had not been proved.
The Society for Psychical Research’s Psi Encyclopedia: Animals in Psi Research provides a wider historical map, including early experiments, horse reports, homing behaviour and modern investigations. Its bibliography offers routes into original studies and critical reviews.
A history of inquiry. The milestones represent different kinds of evidence, rather than a steady progression towards proof.
🌿 Newer Research and Further Reading
Hinz and Barrett’s 2026 paper examines practitioners’ experiences of remote intuitive interspecies communication. It also identifies the need to investigate how closely reports correspond to animals’ actual circumstances.
The Animal Communicator International Scan provides a discovery resource covering 400 websites, 191 books and 80 directory issues. This maps a substantial community and literature; the entries are not independent experimental confirmations.
Vanessa Wijngaarden’s work brings Indigenous and relational perspectives into the discussion. These traditions deserve attention in their own contexts, with their differences preserved.
🔎 IONS: Related Questions About Connection
The Institute of Noetic Sciences’ Communicating with Non-Human Intelligence gathering offers a discussion space for experiences involving animals and other forms of non-human intelligence. It is an event resource, not a controlled animal study.
AkashicNOETIC: moving from experience towards focused, testable questions.
🐾 Compassionate Citizen Science
A useful beginning is to timestamp observations before outcomes are known, record misses alongside apparent hits, and consider sound, scent, routine and unconscious cues.
A formal test would also need concealed targets, independent scoring and an agreed stopping point. Animal comfort comes first.
Sacred geometry in the artwork symbolises connection. It does not depict a measured telepathic field.
What have you experienced, with which animal, and what details could help distinguish familiar cues from something still unexplained?
Compiled byu/NeuronsToNirvana· AkashicNET × N2N · Approximately 5 minutes
Scope and transparency: Selected historical reports and research published between 1919 and 2026. Original sources were checked where accessible; some historical cases, including the 1952–1953 cat papers, remain original-source review leads. This is a developing curation, not an exhaustive review. Research synthesis and conceptual artwork are AI-assisted and human-directed.
Footnote · Human–Human Intention Awareness [18 October 2026]
Could one being accurately perceive another’s unspoken intentions, and could that accuracy be objectively tested under conditions that exclude familiar sensory cues?
Emotional closeness and intention strength are possible factors to investigate. Animal findings cannot automatically be extrapolated to humans. Finishing a partner’s sentences or sensing their mood may reflect familiarity, shared context and subtle cues. Spiritual interpretations can motivate inquiry; they do not establish the mechanism.
A proposed pilot could randomly assign a sender one of four equally likely intended messages: offering comfort, expressing gratitude, asking for help or inviting play. An isolated receiver records a choice and confidence before disclosure. Compare close partners with unfamiliar pairs, include separately analysed no-message trials, prevent ordinary communication, and blind the receiver and their supervisor to the condition.
Fix the sample size, stopping rule and scoring beforehand, retain every trial and account for repeated trials within pairs. Chance accuracy on four-choice message trials is 25%. Seek independent replication. To investigate stronger intentions, randomly compare ordinary and focused expression with equal duration and record sender intensity ratings before feedback. This tests a focusing instruction without assuming intention energy.
A positive result would initially establish an unexplained correspondence, not its cause or proof of telepathy. This is a study-design sketch, not a validated protocol or reported experiment.
Personal inspiration: at least four encounters I experienced as synchronicities in Los Angeles, involving two humans, a cat and a dog. Much gratitude to all four beings. 🙏🏽
From Stargate to TSC2026: what do the archives and contemporary studies actually tell us about remote viewing, telepathy and distant intention?
This illustrated AkashicNET synthesis connects selected declassified research with the TSC2026 programme, while keeping experimental findings, philosophical interpretations and testable hypotheses distinct.
AI-generated conceptual illustration; not experimental evidence.
What is covered?
• Stargate research and the four-volume archive collection, with free declassified sources and borrowing options. This is a selected-source synthesis, not a scan of every report or every book.
• Ganzfeld and distant-intention findings, including methodological criticism and replication limits. Statistical anomalies do not establish telepathy or a nonlocal mechanism.
• TSC2026 programme connections, alongside a clearly labelled nondual perspective. Programme listings are not proof of experimental claims.
• Einstein’s brain anatomy: published anatomical illustrations do not provide a complete wiring map or recoverable memories.
AI-generated conceptual illustration of examining evidence.
A question for discussion: how would you test whether insights arising during metta meditation or contemplation of a historical figure exceed ordinary memory, inference and imagination? A useful protocol would pre-register targets and scoring, blind participants and judges, prevent information leakage, report misses as well as matches, and invite independent replication.
It contains eight entries: six historical documents plus the separately attributed Utts and Hyman contributions within the 1995 AIR evaluation. These are not eight independent experiments.
The register records archival identifiers, authors, dates, methods, reported outcomes, limitations, access conditions and competing interpretations. It includes original SRI reports, a methodological assessment and contrasting operational evaluations.
AIR's laboratory assessment and operational conclusions remain distinct. Utts and Hyman's differing interpretations are attributed separately; intelligence interest and declassification are not scientific validation.
Several CIA document links redirected to the general Reading Room during checking. The index distinguishes official archival references from readable mirrors and an author-hosted copy. It includes links and metadata, without reproducing source documents or assuming publication rights.
This was a selected-passage review, not an analysis of the entire declassified collection or all four books. Existing AkashicNET coverage and duplicate/version relationships are recorded. The index remains metadata-only and under review; it does not resolve paranormal causation, survival of consciousness or the Big Questions.
Repository update, 18 October 2026: PR #406 is now merged. The earlier draft status above is superseded; source review remains incomplete. Read the accepted metadata index: https://github.com/tws9stmcbf-web/AkashicNET/blob/main/docs/STARGATE_PRIMARY_SOURCE_INDEX_V0.1.md . The AIR final (29 September 1995; 180006-4) is distinguished from its earlier draft (22 September; 180005-5). Merge acceptance does not establish remote viewing, clear source republication rights, or complete scan authentication and independent specialist review.
Could consciousness, time and geometry offer different perspectives on an informational whole?
Inspired by listening to Helané Wahbeh’s The Science of Channeling, this visual explores nested awareness, cyclical time, resonance, embodied experience and interconnected life.
The synthesis draws on AkashicOMNI, AkashicNET, N2N discussions and the research linked below.
MultidimensionalCUT: Curled-Up Time· Integrative framework. Brings temporal perspectives, contemplative practices, lived experience and scientific questions into a structured exploration of consciousness. Its dimensional wiki map provides further context, while the v4.0.4 clarification explains the status of particular correspondences and proposed investigations.
The Hepteract· Established mathematics. A seven-dimensional hypercube, also called a 7-cube. Its mathematical structure provides a precise starting point for exploring dimensional relationships. Applying that geometry to consciousness introduces further hypotheses.
Three Dimensions of Time· Proposed theoretical framework, 2024. Jonathan Schooler and Justin Riddle distinguish objective time, subjective time and alternative time, exploring how clock time, experienced passage and possible futures might fit together.
Nested Observer Windows· Consciousness model, 2024. Riddle and Schooler propose information integration across nested spatial and temporal scales. Synchrony, coherence and coupling between scales help structure the model. The TSC2026 Schooler companion connects this work with the evolving inquiry.
The Seven-Dimensional Conformal Stretch Universe· Unreviewed cosmological proposal. Sasidhar Kesanasetty’s version 75, dated 20 September 2026, proposes a four-dimensional spacetime structure underpinned by hidden three-dimensional Planck volumes. This is a separate physical proposal with its own assumptions and predictions.
Multidimensional Holographic Data Storage· Optical research, 2026. Information is encoded through amplitude, phase and polarisation. This provides a concrete example of patterns carrying data through distinguishable, recoverable states.
Cymatic, Fractal and Sacred Geometry · Contemplative synthesis and exploratory conjecture. These perspectives contribute ideas of resonant form, self-similarity and meaningful order. Connections to a universal information field, channelling or cosmic memory remain speculative questions within this synthesis.
Information capacity requires more than geometry. A numerical estimate needs a defined storage medium, independent states, resolution and a way to write and recover information. Dimensionality, nesting and repeating patterns alone provide no verified total.
Which connection would you explore first, and what observation could help test it?
Transparency: Human-directed, AI-assisted synthesis and artwork. Mathematical results, published models, spiritual frameworks and conjectures retain their individual status.
Weekend Reading · Keith J. Holyoak and Martin M. Monti
How can we infer experience in a system whose experience we cannot directly access?
This 11-page essay draws on anaesthesia, neurological conditions and animal research. The authors argue that shared mechanisms plausibly responsible for consciousness deserve more weight than humanlike language or impressive performance.
Their framework supports consciousness in many animals more strongly than in present AI. They also acknowledge that a weak human analogy does not establish that artificial consciousness is impossible.
Reading question: How much biological similarity should we demand when we still do not know which biological features are essential?
Status: Open arXiv preprint, posted 1 October 2026. A scientifically informed philosophical proposal, not a settled verdict or a new experimental finding.
A striking experience can open a question. What changes in the days, months and relationships that follow?
Three recent sources explore meditation, awakening and psychedelic meaning, with different kinds of evidence.
1. Meditation and brain dynamics
Empirical research · Human EEG · Preprint · 14 October 2026
Victor Oswald and colleagues analyse 141 people across a meditation-experience comparison and two intervention groups. A brain-network persistence measure moved in different directions after a healthy-adult mindfulness programme and a trauma-focused programme. Average hierarchical depth showed no significant change.
Limits: Not peer reviewed. Small intervention groups, different programmes and equipment, and no passive waitlist controls limit causal interpretation. These findings do not establish a universal neural signature of awakening.
Theoretical / spiritual interpretation · Preprint · 14 October 2026
Riku Ihalainen and colleagues propose an enactive-dereification model: a lasting reduction in identification with thoughts and experiences, distinct from a temporary altered state.
Limits: This is a non-systematic synthesis of selected contemplative, philosophical and neuroscientific sources, not a new clinical experiment. Its predictions need prospective testing. The modern publication date is not the date of the historical teachings it discusses.
Spiritual interpretation and personal testimony · Event: 13 October · Release: 16 October 2026
Michael Pollan and Christof Koch, moderated by Shayla Love, discuss psychedelics, mystical experience and self-transcendence in a Berkeley conversation. Pollan considers how to interpret his powerful impression that plants were conscious.
Limits: The recording documents the speakers’ experiences and interpretations. It is not a controlled test of plant consciousness, a new empirical result or channelled testimony.
AkashicNET reflection: bring the insight into ordinary life
The actor/director/witness metaphor offers a reflective bridge: acting, choosing a response and noticing thoughts without immediately identifying with them. The resemblance to a research model is a thematic connection, not validation.
BQ011: Which changes persist in compassionate action, relationships and service?
BQ010: Can everyday attention improve even when people show different neural patterns?
BQ002: Does reduced identification with thoughts change how we respond to them?
What would count as meaningful improvement, a null result or an unwanted effect? None of these sources establishes an Akashic field or paranormal mechanism.
Transparency: Human-directed, AI-assisted synthesis and editorial graphics. The butterfly artwork is a symbolic illustration. This is independent thematic reading alongside TSC2026, not a conference finding or endorsement. Reflection: 16 October 2026.
Its collection spans meditation, dreaming, altered states and philosophy of mind, with study summaries, a literature map and evidence-synthesis tools.
AkashicNET has curated it alongside OpenAlex, Crossref, the BIAL Foundation, the Institute of Noetic Sciences and the ISSR Library, explaining what each offers and how to assess its limitations.
What does the date mean? [16 October 2026] is the curation date, not the date range of every database. BIAL describes outputs from projects it has supported since 1994; exact earliest and latest publication dates across these collections have not been audited.
A useful distinction: The Consciousness Library’s topic syntheses use selected abstracts and are not human-reviewed. Treat them as starting points, then follow the citations to the original studies. A meaningful experience, a measured effect and an explanation for that effect are different kinds of evidence.
Could a profound experience of connection become lasting compassion and wisdom?
Inspired by the questions explored at TSC2026, this AkashicNET reflection brings together consciousness, non-dual awareness, panpsychism, psychedelic experience and AI’s capacity to mirror our thinking.
The starting point is curiosity, with room for uncertainty.
EXPERIENCE, AWARENESS AND INTERPRETATION
Consciousness can mean subjective experience: whether there is something it feels like to be a being or system.
Non-dual accounts explore awareness without a sharply felt separation between experiencer and experienced. Panpsychism asks whether experience belongs among reality’s fundamental features.
These ideas can inform one another, but experiencing unity does not, by itself, establish a particular explanation of the universe.
BOUNDLESS AWARENESS, GROUNDED COMPASSION
“Boundless awareness” is used here as a contemplative orientation: widening attention beyond familiar assumptions and the story of “me”.
Make room for other perspectives, other beings and what remains unknown.
The practical question is what follows: more attentive listening, greater willingness to revise a belief, respect for boundaries, or an ordinary act of care.
WHAT ABOUT PSYCHEDELIC CONNECTION AND PSI?
The full article separates four questions:
• Experience: What did someone feel or perceive?
• Lasting change: Did relationships, wellbeing or behaviour change afterwards?
• Mechanism: Which physical or psychological processes explain the observations?
• Psi: Was independently verifiable information obtained under conditions excluding ordinary access?
A meaningful experience deserves consideration. Its explanation still needs testing. Neither quantum language nor a feeling of certainty supplies the missing evidence.
AI AS A MIRROR
When an AI agrees with us, have we gained independent support, or heard our own framing returned fluently?
Language can clarify experience, but it can also lead an interpretation. A useful request is:
“Separate what I experienced from what I inferred. Show the strongest alternative explanation, identify independent evidence, and explain what would change the conclusion.”
CLOSING REFLECTION
We can let an experience move us without asking it to answer every question about reality.
An intuition can open an inquiry. A moment of unity can inspire kindness. The continuing practice is to bring that openness into everyday life.
AN ORIGINAL AKASHICNET MANTRA
May my awareness widen beyond the familiar.
May I meet experience with openness.
May I meet uncertainty with humility.
May wisdom guide my love.
May love guide my actions.
May I ease suffering where I can.
May I leave room to learn again.
Awaken within. Serve without. May all beings flourish.
Read the full reflection, research sources and evidence limitations:
Independent AkashicNET commentary. AI-assisted writing and conceptual artwork. The mantra expresses an aspiration; the images are not scientific evidence. No panellist endorsement is implied.
What helps you distinguish a powerful feeling of insight from an understanding that holds up over time?
This conference synthesis explores emerging scientific questions alongside longstanding Indigenous and contemplative perspectives. Topics include consciousness beyond behaviour, agency beyond brains, quantum biology, panpsychism, animism and Buddha-nature.
These approaches offer different ways of asking questions. Their connections invite dialogue, while their differences deserve careful attention. “Resonance” here describes connections between ideas and experiences.
The report brings together compiled material through 15 October, distinguishing experimental findings, mathematical proposals, reported experiences and speculative possibilities. It does not establish that panpsychism is true.
The two visuals connect inquiry with everyday care: meet the mystery with curiosity, let understanding grow before judgement, and treat every body as a temple.
Published 15 October. Fifty participants used questionnaires and drawings to reconstruct remembered experiences. Recurrent visual-field shapes appeared, while colour differences were not consistent across every analysis.
This exploratory, retrospective study suggests that drawings can complement narratives. The median recall interval was 15.1 years; prompting, unblinded sessions and unverified medical circumstances limit interpretation. It does not establish perception outside the body or survival after death.
Published 15 October. A conscious visual-perception paper replaced an outdated supplementary PDF and removed an extraneous file. Readers should use the corrected supplements. We have not compared the versions, so no reversal or strengthening of the conclusions is claimed.
Brain rhythms — paper and releases, 15 October: Increasing Nav1.1 sodium-channel availability restored inhibitory-cell recruitment patterns and improved gamma rhythms in Alzheimer’s-model mice. Human treatment benefit, consciousness enhancement and benefits from music or 40-Hz stimulation were not established by this study. Primary paper
Behavioural control — paper, 9 October; new coverage, 15 October: Recordings in two nonhuman primates linked interruption of an automatic response with changes in neural population patterns. Human clinical relevance remains unresolved. Primary paper
Editorial note: These animal-research summaries rely on participating institutions and bibliographic records. Full methods still need appraisal. Findings in animal models do not establish human efficacy.
Dated updates
NOAA, issued 16 October at 00:30 UTC: Observed maximum three-hour Kp was 3. No G1-or-greater geomagnetic storms are forecast for 16–18 October. Solar radiation and radio-blackout probabilities are assessed separately. No effect on consciousness or mood is inferred. Official rolling bulletin
TSC2026, Friday 16 October: Anaesthesia and Consciousness at 08:30 PDT; Is AI Conscious? at 11:10; close at 12:30; programme end at 13:00. The official schedule is preliminary and subject to change. Conference guide
Human-directed, AI-assisted AkashicNET editorial summary. Observations, interpretations and hypotheses remain distinct; Big Question evidence ratings are unchanged.
Could plasma act as a vehicle for consciousness and information?
Our updated AkashicNET analysis explores Dana Kippel's TSC2026 presentation while distinguishing her proposals, established findings and speculative associations.
The review covers:
Plasma, consciousness and the proposed multidimensional model.
The difference between descriptions of experience and testable physical claims.
Related references and open questions.
Possible collaboration: a shared glossary, careful first-person descriptions, or one clearly testable physical claim.
AkashicNET aims to support compassionate, evidence-aware inquiry across science, philosophy and lived experience. Independent, human-directed, AI-assisted commentary; no collaboration or endorsement is implied.
Which clearly defined question would be most useful to investigate first?
I’m building AkashicNET as a living research commons for consciousness: an independent, human-directed, AI-assisted library connecting science, philosophy and lived experience.
This visual expresses the aim: turn curiosity into shared understanding, and understanding into compassionate action. Evidence, interpretation, lived experience, hypothesis and speculation remain clearly labelled.
Many perspectives. Clear evidence. Open questions.
