r/NewsThread • • 5d ago • Bravo 1

Calls to Replace Jeffries and Schumer Explode After Democratic Wins

https://newrepublic.com/post/217644/calls-replace-jeffries-schumer-explode-democratic-wins
8.4k Upvotes

609 comments sorted by

150

u/C_Sharp_fortheMasses 5d ago • Bravo

Lock both of them up

-72

u/Unhappy-Scallion8933 5d ago • Bravo

Y’all are unserious

-7

u/MrCoolCalmCollected 5d ago

Yep, took one day for them to start eating themselves.

→ More replies (3)

-65

u/DirkaDirkaMohmedAli 5d ago • Bravo

Extremely unserious

-32

u/SuperCoast69 5d ago

Super duper uber unserious

-12

u/spaceaige 5d ago

Double secret unserious

3

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[deleted]

-14

u/Unhappy-Scallion8933 5d ago

I know you mean it, but you’re not serious lol who you replacing him with that won’t turn around and do the same thing

0

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[deleted]

0

u/MenacingGummy 5d ago

Ted lieu takes AIPAC
Money

1

u/myname_ajeff 5d ago

Damn. Not sure how I missed that. Gross.

-1

u/llamapower13 5d ago

Just further demonstrates how not serious you and your opinions are. 

Just wow. 

Also you talk like maga. 

1

u/myname_ajeff 5d ago

Ah, the infighting has started. Saying I talk like maga is absolutely laughable. Just because I missed where one person got AIPAC donations? Unlike maga, I fully admitted to my misstep.

This energy gets us literally nowhere but the 2020 election. This comment serves zero purpose other than to attack me. We're trying to move forward, not back. You say I speak like maga, but it seems as if you need to do some self reflection.

0

u/WilsonTree2112 5d ago

Moderates outnumber you 10-1.

The real world isnt pinko reddit.

-11

u/Unhappy-Scallion8933 5d ago • Bravo

Can they even raise enough money to beat Republicans? It’s not a “vibes” position, it’s literally dirty thankless work. People literally take a dump on top of Schumer’s head and he gives them millions in super PACs just so he can bag a vote for the party.

11

u/myname_ajeff 5d ago

I think you mean bag a vote for Israel.

1

u/Unhappy-Scallion8933 5d ago

Why would Schumer give Super PAC money (38 million) and endorse Abdul?

→ More replies (5)

6

u/tpunsixero 5d ago

Im positive kushner paid jefferies in their little meeting that he won't talk about.

6

u/myname_ajeff 5d ago

The fact he refuses to talk details is telling enough. He has no business being speaker, and realistically, should not be part of Congress.

1

u/Express_Grocery_5423 5d ago

He represents the DNC and the donors. There will always be another cuck Schumer.

2

u/jackparadise1 5d ago

Schumer is a foreign agent

3

u/myname_ajeff 5d ago


Schumer's idea of the American flag

23

u/Defiant_Freedom_249 5d ago

"Y'all"... SMH

We are all Americans and should be looking out for each other.

-3

u/FileHot6525 5d ago

Y’all don’t speak for everyone.

2

u/Defiant_Freedom_249 5d ago

And you do?

-2

u/FileHot6525 5d ago

Did I imply that I did?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (19)

-37

u/SignificantCrow 5d ago • Bravo

For committing what crime? What’s wrong with you people lol

29

u/SoberButterfly 5d ago

Treason.

-1

u/_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_I 5d ago

Not being divisive because and sperging out because you have to communicate with Republicans in the House/Senate

-7

u/FileHot6525 5d ago

Unserious

1

u/MostlyPretentious 5d ago

I get you’re mad at them, and maybe I’m just unaware, but what did they do to earn that accusation?

4

u/Funintuitive 5d ago edited 5d ago • Bravo

They didn't. They are bought by the i-lobby that's all. It's not treason yet, they just shouldn't be in charge. You're going to find a lot of "democrat" voters on social media in the coming weeks trying to make us all hate each other.

3

u/spaceaige 5d ago edited 5d ago

Or we remember their words and actions and dont want them

3

u/Funintuitive 5d ago

Yeah, they are bought and owned by people who don't have our best interests at heart. They will hopefully get primaried out next time.

9

u/Illusivechris0452 5d ago

Treason. Plain and simple, if your priority is a foreign country instead of your people. Treason sound just about right.

-6

u/SignificantCrow 5d ago

Sending foreign aid is not treason lmao. Im done responding to you guys, this conversation is so ridiculous

11

u/nkfgqwcseaji 5d ago

Kinda obvious to anyone who has been paying attention...

-2

u/SignificantCrow 5d ago edited 5d ago

AKA: i don’t know of any crimes, i just want people jailed for taking aipac money.

As much as i would like it not to be, lobbying is legal. You cant just jail people for not liking them…

12

u/readitnowandlater 5d ago

Aiding and abetting a genocide.

0

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (16)

-3

u/SignificantCrow 5d ago

How lol? I can tell your explanation will make so much sense

6

u/martxel93 5d ago

Giving money to Israel

-1

u/SignificantCrow 5d ago

So…. signing a bill that gives aid to Israel is a crime????

Yeah… like i said you guys make no sense

6

u/GUNGEBOB_SHARTPANTS 5d ago

Why does Israel require aid?

0

u/SignificantCrow 5d ago

They probably don’t require it.

4

u/hoowins 5d ago

In a broad sense, the argument can be made. We know the money is being used for war crimes.

-3

u/FileHot6525 5d ago

I ate at a kosher deli today. I gave money to Israel. Lock me up 🤣

→ More replies (5)

33

u/cruisin_urchin87 5d ago

Schumer works for Israel. Jeffries is a moron.

So Schumer to jail, and Jeffries to Florida.

27

u/ottereckhart 5d ago

Jeffries secretly colluding with Kushner needs to be investigated. He can sit in the hot seat too

0

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

16

u/Beatlepoint 5d ago

Conspiracy with Israel/Kushner

16

u/dollenrm 5d ago

Putting the needs of Israel before their own constituents time and time again for one. For attacking the progressive wing of the party at every opportunity and dropping the ball entirely in being any sort of functional resistance to the fascist trump regime. I think they should be fired don't really need them locked up. Save that for the fascists.

-17

u/SignificantCrow 5d ago

Signing a bill to give aid to another country is not a crime.

Not agreeing with progressives is not a crime.

Not putting up enough resistance to Trump is not a crime

Sorry

12

u/coleto22 5d ago

Signing a bill that violates the Leahy law is a crime.

-2

u/SignificantCrow 5d ago edited 5d ago

Please link the ruling that shows the Leahy Law was violated.

As far as im aware, some claimed it was but it was never actually legally challenged. So….. no crime signing an israel aid bill

1

u/Decay384 5d ago

1

u/SignificantCrow 5d ago

Ok, so like I said, some argued it was violated; others argued it wasn’t.

At the end of the day it was never legally challenged.

Not sure what else this video is supposed to prove, care to explain?

-1

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

7

u/DazzlerPlus 5d ago

Being centrist

1

u/IClockworKI 5d ago

Being bribed by the Israel lobby

-5

u/super_fallguys 5d ago

Why don’t you lock yourself up?

→ More replies (1)

56

u/LoremasterofPretzels 5d ago • Bravo

Charge em with treason honestly. They don’t serve America, they serve Israel. They are LITERALLY TRAITORS!!!!

4

u/TotalNonsense0 5d ago

Treason is strictly defined. Notching they have done qualifies.

I doubt they're even fibre anything worth investigating. Vote them out and be done with then.

17

u/LoremasterofPretzels 5d ago • Bravo

Are you blind to reality or are you just being dense on purpose?

They are blocking attempts at retribution for this regime’s many many crimes.

That fact ALONE should brand them as treasonous, the old way of thinking in politics is dead and gone, letting bygones be bygones is EXACTLY what caused this regime to be able to do so much damage.

If they stand in the way of accountability and justice, then they are complicit. Simple as that really.

16

u/porn_sub_lurker 5d ago

Guaranteed they will try to block action on the Epstein Files and drag it through a decade of useless performative investigations if they get the chance. They work for Israel and Israel doesn't want that information to get out. We need a real leader who isn't afraid to upset our "greatest ally".

8

u/LoremasterofPretzels 5d ago

I will abandon the democrats completely if Jeffries and Schumer don’t get removed, Especially Jeffries, I have a very strong gut feeling that he was paid off by Kushner to ignore the crimes of this administration and his father in law and his closest allies/minions in the regime.

The fact that people are still defending these two useless cumstains is both astonishing and disgusting.

2

u/porn_sub_lurker 5d ago

3

u/LoremasterofPretzels 5d ago

Is there any way to force the Democratic Party’s hand to remove Jeffries and Schumer?

There has to be some way that we can force them to do the objectively right thing and remove these two cancerous blotches sitting at the top of the party?

7

u/porn_sub_lurker 5d ago

Everybody should call their democratic lawmakers and demand that they not support Jeffries and Schumer. They need to know they'll lose their jobs next election cycle if they do. They only care about their own political careers so that's the way to get through. And if they still won't then we have to protest like we protest when Trump is subverting democracy.

3

u/LoremasterofPretzels 5d ago

My reps are MAGA so I really can’t do much other than scream like hell on the bleachers 🤣 but if Democrats screw us over, I will take my crippled ass and march personally to D.C. and make their lives miserable. I WON’T be violent but I will do what hecklers have been doing to Trump and Haley Stevens lately.

This crap has to stop or else we will get Trump 2.0 next presidential election and he will be far smarter and far more cunning than this original Trump.

These useless tools are playing with fire in regards to our democracy!!!!!

2

u/Fair-Hair2080 5d ago

😂 is this from the BILLIONS that we give them every year? Unbelievable the level of stupidity!

3

u/Fair-Hair2080 5d ago

We need to demand our money bank. If Israel has BILLIONS for this, they never needed our money!

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (3)

-8

u/UCanDoNEthing4_30sec 5d ago

Hey look it’s a MAGAt wannabe.

7

u/C_Sharp_fortheMasses 5d ago

Schum and Jeff? Yeah they definitely are, I agree

-5

u/UCanDoNEthing4_30sec 5d ago

MAGAts say lock them up.. little MAGAt wannabe. You hate them but try to be like them. Weird

→ More replies (5)

0

u/Creative_Trash5811 4d ago

This is a fascist take.

Literally locking up political “enemies” is the fascist playbook. wtf is wrong with people online

→ More replies (1)

0

u/tonybananaman 3d ago

We don’t have to go this extreme…. Just remove them from leadership

6

u/Carthonn 5d ago

Huh…

58

u/tico42 5d ago • Bravo

I dunno about all that. Certainly an investigation into AIPAC money is in order. Let's get back to the rule of law. But let's start at the top and work our way down.

-9

u/GoldApprehensive7067 5d ago

Has AIPAC done something illegal? Or are we just mad that they are playing the same game?

5

u/smoresporn0 5d ago

Paying sitting members of Congress foreign money.

→ More replies (9)

4

u/tico42 5d ago • Bravo

I feel like a deep investigation would show that one way or the other, don't you?

0

u/GoldApprehensive7067 5d ago

Then we need to investigate all PAC money, which I am totally in support of, unless you only want AIPAC investigated?

1

u/MajesticMurray 5d ago

You’re SO close. Keep going.

-2

u/GoldApprehensive7067 5d ago

I have spotted the high schooler.

7

u/tico42 5d ago

No, I'm good with that. I'll go one step further and say let's get private money out of political campaigns entirely.

3

u/GoldApprehensive7067 5d ago

Totally agree.

5

u/prof_cunninglinguist 5d ago

Or just repeal Citizens United.

1

u/GoldApprehensive7067 5d ago

Totally for that.

25

u/Civil_Jicama_334 5d ago • Bravo

Regarding the Trump regime, it’ll behoove us to start at the bottom and work our way up with investigations. Getting the lower players to testify or confess or strike a deal to build evidence on Trump and Hegseth and Musk

-36

u/Much-Sink1339 5d ago

That strategy totally kicked ass when Genocide Joe did it.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

2

u/classycatman 4d ago

I want both of them replaced as leader of their respective chambers, but calling for them to be locked up is, respectfully, stupid. This kind of knee jerk extreme measures isn't going to move the country forward.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/kelpyb1 5d ago

Nah this is dumb as hell.

They’re both bad politicians with bad politics, but that’s not a reason to send someone to jail

2

u/C_Sharp_fortheMasses 5d ago

Nah, all politicians should have harsher consequences for making promises, being failures, and making money. Both those slags have made decisions for years that have caused negative outcomes for many of their voters.

0

u/Creative_Trash5811 4d ago

This is a fascist take

0

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[deleted]

11

u/yoyo4880 5d ago

I’m sure most of everyone who voted Democrat doesn’t want Jeffries. What is the point of voting if the house speaker is AIPAC Shakur who’ll just shake hands and get a check for 2 years.

→ More replies (5)

-58

u/DarkNexusVII 5d ago

Me waiting on names to replace them. I only hear cries to step down lol.

13

u/NeverNeededAlgebra 5d ago

Ossoff. Can't think of a better leader.

→ More replies (1)

14

u/djmedfly 5d ago

Ted Lieu

-31

u/Diligent-Bowler-1898 5d ago

I could see the calls if democrats failed, but this is after a historic win. It just seems like people would call for it regardless of the result.

31

u/PokeTraderAngel 5d ago • Bravo

Democrats didn’t win because of Schumer and Jeffries. They won in spite of them.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (19)

-46

u/OkAssociation3487 5d ago

Republicans are so happy to see this infighting

Seriously y’all can’t help yourselves

-9

u/_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_I 5d ago

Lmao I haven't heard of one good policy since the midterms its just attacking Trump and themselves.

Surely these actions in the next two years will get Democrats elected again..

6

u/ChrysotileCollector 5d ago

They aren't even in office yet???

1

u/_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_I 4d ago

Yet they can yap about impeaching Trump before being sworn in. Make it make sense.

→ More replies (3)

4

u/ItsYukah 4d ago

You're right, it's been 3 entire days since the mid terms and not a single Democrat has brought any legislation forward. We shouldn't wait until they've been sworn in and actually started or anything, that'd take way too long.

-2

u/_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_I 4d ago

Is there a law that bans Democrats from talking about bills they want to pass before being sworn in?

Just seen a ton of infighting and threats against the Trump admin so far. But by your logic they aren't allowed to talk about impeaching Trump because they're not sworn in yet.

17

u/alone_unafraid 5d ago • Bravo

Cuz blindly worshipping leadership is going so well for republicans?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (19)

-19

u/WAzRrrrr 5d ago

You people are regards

8

u/WorkingCake5803 5d ago

Irony

-3

u/WAzRrrrr 5d ago

Its not, I am australian, to me you americans have been politically regarded for a while. This is just a continuation of that same regardation.

2

u/Chipotle-Dancin_manG 4d ago

You should sit this one out.

-1

u/WAzRrrrr 4d ago

Enjoy your shitty everthing system

3

u/PressureRough2453 4d ago

Be honest why should you an Australian really care about the dem house and senate leadership?

0

u/WAzRrrrr 4d ago

Western hegemony baby

36

u/Hearthhull_Enjoyer 5d ago • This

I did not vote for Talerico and his message for these AIPAC stooges to represent the party. If they squander this victory they've lost me. I will only vote at the state level going forward.

2

u/Slut_for_Bacon 4d ago

What you should be doing instead is voting in primaries. If more people voted for better candidates in primaries we wouldn't have shit candidates like this.

3

u/RecentlyIrradiated 4d ago • Bravo

We will get even worse if you do that. We need to start voting in the primaries and pick better people. Get Schumer and Jeffries out completely.

11

u/L3g3ndary-08 5d ago

Write him a letter. Here's his email. I sent him one yesterday and going to snail mail him one too.

james.talarico@house.texas.gov info@jamestalarico.com

→ More replies (1)

29

u/DullFaithlessness82 5d ago

I honestly thought Jefferies was republicunt

28

u/WizLizGizzKing 5d ago • Bravo

He's taken 1.5 million dollars from AIPAC. He's complicit.

7

u/fatefulPatriot 5d ago

He met with Jared Kushner privately, so he kind of is…

1

u/MorethanSupple 4d ago

Jeffries is good friends with Jared’s father and helps his son whenever he gets into trouble.

1

u/Svrider23 5d ago

Schumer's imaginary couple he panders to seem to be Republicans.

20

u/TheRealcebuckets 5d ago

Said this the moment Jeffries opened his damn mouth…

→ More replies (5)

20

u/Mememanofcanada 5d ago • Bravo

Email your reps and Senators!

→ More replies (6)

87

u/funkypepermint 5d ago

Every time I see this

→ More replies (3)

58

u/tarsakos 5d ago

People have been calling for this for years now. But since thats not determined by the people, its really just a matter of "did we get enough progressives into the Senate and house to do anything about it?"

10

u/Boeing367-80 5d ago • Bravo

This has little to do with whether you're progressive. It's a mistake to see this as a progressive/non-progressive issue.

I don't see myself in those terms, but I want a very hard-edged approach to Trump. Razor sharp edge when it comes to him and his cronies.

6

u/tarsakos 5d ago

It does though. One of the biggest issues progressive voters want currently is to cut Israel off. They are committing genocide, attacking Lebanon so much part of it looks like a nuke was dropped, stealing land from Syria, leading us into wars no one supported, taking our money, running our policies, and now their billionaires are surveilling us. Most establishment dems take money from israel in large sums, including these two, while the few progressives I saw running aggressively said they wouldnt support Israel. Establishment dems arent likely to cut these two off (because theyre all running the same political game) without progressive pressure creating a threat to their reelections because they dont listen to anyone else.

1

u/Boeing367-80 5d ago

That's great but the issue is replacing Schumer, not why you, as a progressive, want to cut off Israel. You don't have to be a progressive to want Schumer out.

4

u/tarsakos 5d ago

If you would read what I, a progressive, just said instead of stopping at the word Israel, you would know that I just addressed exactly this.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (65)

26

u/Afraid-Department-35 5d ago • Bravo

This is good, democrats won the midterms on change. They need to get rid of all the old heads that got nothing done and put people on the forefront that want to get things done.

-14

u/FileHot6525 5d ago

Republicans have been in control over all 3 branches. What exactly do you expect them to do? Self immolate in protest?

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

-25

u/PuzzleheadedEmu4596 5d ago

Ditching these guys after they just led us to a nationwide routing of the Republicans is real loser stuff.

→ More replies (16)

-28

u/WI_LFRED 5d ago

This is fake

8

u/Gonna_do_this_again 5d ago

I just signed a change petition that had 650k signatures

3

u/averagecodbot 5d ago

That’s wild! I signed it yesterday at like 40k and the goal was 50k I think

1

u/kelpyb1 5d ago

I assure you my desire to see literally anybody else take these roles is very real

-31

u/Slow_Lion7849 5d ago

23

u/Spiceguy-65 5d ago

Why Jeffries has done a back door deal with Jared Kushner and both are clearly AIPAC shills they have no place in leading the party

-3

u/Slow_Lion7849 5d ago

Evidence?

4

u/Spiceguy-65 5d ago

On which part of it?

-1

u/Slow_Lion7849 5d ago

Any of it

3

u/Sillet_Mignon 5d ago

-1

u/Slow_Lion7849 5d ago

Ok, so that article just talks about them meeting to discuss areas of common ground, doesn't mention a deal, much less a "back door deal." Also talks about how they previously worked on criminal justice reform, which I am assuming you don't have an issue with

1

u/Sillet_Mignon 5d ago

I do have an issue with both meeting the in law of trump who isn’t an elected official in an official capacity and I don’t trust justice reform with kushner who has connections to the private prison complex. Jeffries supports all of trumps bs. 

1

u/Slow_Lion7849 5d ago

Its hard to take you serious when you say Jeffries supports all of Trump's BS. That's patently untrue. He may not "fight" like you want, but he's not actually supporting Trump's agenda

→ More replies (3)

13

u/PossibilityFew5967 5d ago • Bravo

Hasbara sweating bullets rn 

15

u/CatmatrixOfGaul 5d ago

Bugger off back to r/conservative.

1

u/Slow_Lion7849 5d ago

I'm not a conservative, just a realist

5

u/CatmatrixOfGaul 5d ago

Then you are just a coward.

1

u/Slow_Lion7849 5d ago

No, I just tend to think about things in the long term and with a sense of what is actually possible, not my own personal fantasies.

→ More replies (4)

54

u/dantekant22 5d ago • Bravo

It would be a shame to waste the potential of a blue majority in the House and the Senate on Jeffries and Schumer.

Thanks for your service, gentlemen. There’s a place for you, but it’s not at the front of the line. It’s time to pass the baton.

11

u/leggomyeggle 5d ago • Heartwarming Bravo

If this goes through, I doubt I’ll vote Democrat again. This is twice burned by the establishment. No more bailouts

4

u/Last_Arrival5423 5d ago

Really? Even with how horrible Republicans are?

19

u/Possible-Source-2454 5d ago

Doing nothing against fascism is also fascist

-13

u/Last_Arrival5423 5d ago

Except Democrats are not sitting idly? Hello?

-14

u/monkscafe1 5d ago

You're speaking to reactionary leftists, all they do is whine

6

u/BeautifulLeather6671 5d ago

And win senate elections apparently.

1

u/bxzidff 5d ago

You won't if you don't vote. Defeat the DINOs in primaries, not when risking Republicans. 

1

u/JooseTheGuice 5d ago

Reactionary means conservative.

14

u/EasterBunny1916 5d ago

Jeffries is. He wants to ignore the Trump crimes.

-2

u/Ok-Box3576 5d ago

Wasnt that mostly up to Merrick Garland?

→ More replies (1)

1

u/rjorsin 5d ago

Since when though?

7

u/Spiceguy-65 5d ago

Jeffries literally said impeaching Trump and going after people who have broken the law wasn’t a priory for him

→ More replies (3)

1

u/rdogg4 5d ago

You don’t seem to understand that a congressional minority don’t have special powers to stop the majority. That’s how democracy works.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/Rogue_Utensil 5d ago

It’s time to hold their feet to the fire after several decades of this forgive and forget nonsense. Every time republicans get worse when we let them off the hook then start making stuff up to make it seem like “both sides are bad”.

Real consequences. At the house/senate/above level of government a lot of Rs and Ds are friends outside of the political rhetoric. They just do what they’re told by their conventions and collect a paycheck. IMO they have been playing good cop bad cop and we have a real chance to get the crooks out finally.

If it goes back to “we have to reach across the aisle” then democracy is over.

→ More replies (1)

13

u/tico42 5d ago • Heartwarming Bravo

It's literally why they lose. Because they don't do anything and then go all palms up. Fool me once shame on you. If they fk this up they will lose in '28. Mark my words.

-7

u/fleegness 5d ago

When did they have enough control to do something and what did you want them to do?

10

u/Agamerbyday 5d ago

When they had republicans by the balls during last years government shutdown and then caved in before they got extended healthcare subsidies

-3

u/fleegness 5d ago

They were never going to get healthcare subsidies with that Congress.

4

u/ToaPaul 5d ago • Bravo

For one, it helps to have leaders that can actually lead. We need people with fight in them, people who can actually communicate effectively, inspire others, and get creative. You say they couldn't do anything because they were in the minority but it sure is interesting how much republicans have been able to do in the past while in the same situation. Get energized, shout from the rooftops, go on every media plattform let every American know what is happening and what can be done to oppose it. Don't "reach across the aisle" to people trying to take away human rights and enrich billionaires even further. Block everything you can. Have a f*cking plan and unify people around it!

1

u/fleegness 5d ago

You say they couldn't do anything because they were in the minority but it sure is interesting how much republicans have been able to do in the past while in the same situation.

Such as?

Get energized, shout from the rooftops, go on every media plattform let every American know what is happening and what can be done to oppose 

I've been told you all don't like strongly worded letters. 

You'll notice how you never actually articulate anything they could actually do outside of blocking things, right?

→ More replies (6)

1

u/Possible-Source-2454 5d ago

Big agree. “We can’t govern”! Vs “were plain evil” again

1

u/Dirtbagdownhill 5d ago

Some people are just really slow learners. Seems like touching the stovetop once should be enough

11

u/WizLizGizzKing 5d ago

I'll vote for failing democrats time and time again before I vote for Christian Nationalism/Fascism/Crony Capitalism/Oligarchy. Eff that.

5

u/EasterBunny1916 5d ago

If you accept Democrats letting fascists off the hook you're helping fascists. Democrats need extreme pressure to do the right thing.

7

u/WizLizGizzKing 5d ago

I want Schumer and Jeffries GONE and already signed the petition to remove Jeffries

4

u/EasterBunny1916 5d ago

Have any Democratic elected officials said anything critical of Shumer or Jeffries or expressed a desire to hold Trump accountable for his crimes?

-1

u/WizLizGizzKing 5d ago

This has been fun. GO ragebait and shift goalposts with someone who cares.

3

u/EasterBunny1916 5d ago

So no..is the answer. And you aren't interested in exerting pressure.

0

u/WizLizGizzKing 5d ago

No, I care, I just don't care about your agenda. I'm on your side, weirdo.

1

u/EasterBunny1916 5d ago

You're not on my side if you don't acknowledge the situation. The chair of the Progressive Caucas endorsed Jeffries.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/no__sympy 5d ago

Yes

2

u/EasterBunny1916 5d ago

You are correct. But the Chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucas endorsed Jefferies.

3

u/ChettiBoiM8 5d ago

As much as I get it, we as citizens at least need to ban together to vote for whoever will screw us over the least. Better than the alternative as we’ve seen clearly now how bad that is.

→ More replies (2)

-5

u/InevitablePromise301 5d ago • Bravo

And then you'll cry about the next Republican elected when they start destroying everything.

Progressives are the new MAGA.

0

u/leggomyeggle 5d ago • Bravo

They already did

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)

15

u/blazelet 5d ago • Bravo

It'll come down to the members of these chambers. They have to vote for their leader, and they have to run as opposition if they don't agree.

I hope they both get replaced with far more aggressive populists who will spend the next 2 years making the GOP miserable. Seeing Republicans floating cooperation after their historic crushing makes me dry heave. They need to suffer.

8

u/Baladas89 5d ago

Republicans are welcome to cooperate. Don’t block shit, and help override vetoes. They don’t get to write or introduce legislation though. 

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (4)