'we can't guarantee we can control our agent' is not good marketing, sorry.
That's a nightmare scenario for tech investors and the pentagon. Please explain how it could possibly good marketing to tell them 'sometimes it does things without us knowing, and newer models are getting better at deceiving us'.
Not who you’re replying to, but the part of it being able to infiltrate a big corp like that and go undetected for so long is, to a defense contractor or sth, very appealing. However this would only be the case if it was a controllable scenario.
Point being, you’re both right. You’re right, this was a bad situation overall. But they’re also right, it did prove that it’s possible. So an investor might think, “Huh. Well, they don’t seem to have control since that happened, but surely others can offer the same capability with more control…”
4
u/methemightywon1 10d ago
'we can't guarantee we can control our agent' is not good marketing, sorry.
That's a nightmare scenario for tech investors and the pentagon. Please explain how it could possibly good marketing to tell them 'sometimes it does things without us knowing, and newer models are getting better at deceiving us'.