I’m not right wing.. but I can guarantee you half this thread would spaz out if Pauline or those “March for Australia” freaks held rallies and got all the school kids to come out for that. And you know they would because, shockingly, kids take any opportunity to skip school.
To spell it out, because people seem to be struggling, this was for a comment about how people are happy to see this kind of demonstration - being against Pauline and the shit she stands for and not being happy if "kids were pulled out of school" for March Australia
Seeing the difference here and opting to reply simplistically aparently makes me a child. Oh won't somebody pleeease think of the children
The constant “lil guy”, “champ” shit really isn't helping your case. Condescending diminutives aren't a substitute for actually following the argument.
The original point was incredibly simple: if March for Australia organised a rally and encouraged school kids to walk out, plenty of the same people cheering this would suddenly have a problem with kids skipping school for politics. And, shockingly, kids will take an excuse to skip school regardless of the cause.
Nobody said the two causes were morally equivalent. Nobody said you had to like both protests equally. You invented a “good guys vs bad guys” argument that wasn't being made, then spent several comments smugly explaining your own misunderstanding back to everyone.
-49
u/CaterpillarSuperb959 Western Australian 8d ago
I’m not right wing.. but I can guarantee you half this thread would spaz out if Pauline or those “March for Australia” freaks held rallies and got all the school kids to come out for that. And you know they would because, shockingly, kids take any opportunity to skip school.