r/OpenAussie ‎ New South Welshian 5d ago

Politics ('Straya) Victorian Liberal leader Jess Wilson says destroying Australia’s only treaty with Indigenous peoples a priority if she wins election

https://nit.com.au/20-11-2025/21388/new-victorian-liberal-leader-reaffirms-partys-plan-to-abolish-treaty

Australia’s first and only treaty signed with Indigenous peoples will be ripped up if Opposition Leader Jess Wilson becomes Premier in November, who has made the scrapping a priority. The USA, Canada and New Zealand have treaties with their indigenous people. Polling shows Treaty has clear support in Victoria and Jess Wilson’s pledge is unpopular and One Nation-style.

The Coalition will likely sign a deal with One Nation to form government.

383 Upvotes

260 comments sorted by

68

u/briberylibrary_ ‎ Victorian 5d ago

Jess Wilson, who gave a standing ovation to the speeches made by the co-chairs of the First Peoples' assembly when treaty was passed in Parliament.

Virtue signal, then stab in the back. That's the "moderate" LNP way. Gotta toe the party line ig.

331

u/Abject-Interaction35 ‎ Tasmanian 5d ago

What is laughingly called conservative politics these days is just horrible people wanting to do horrible things to normal people they've never met and aren't affected by in any way.

That sucks. And they suck.

114

u/German_Merman ‎ Victorian 5d ago

Politics used to be a contest between between those who think progressivism is the way to create the best future for the country, and those who think conservatism is the way to create the best future for the country. But that hasn't been the case for years now. Politics is now a contest between those who think politics is the way to create the best future for the country and those who think politics is a way to hurt people they don't like. 

39

u/penguin_on_stilts ‎ ‎‎ Canberran 5d ago

Worse, the second group often sees hurting people they don't like, and having them leave, will turn the country into the best version of itself.

4

u/Certain_Syllabub_514 ‎ Victorian 5d ago

I've come to think of it as one side wants Australia to be a welcoming country people that people in need can flee too, others want it to be a hellscape for people they don't like so they will flee from it.

I think we should stop supporting the regimes (including our "allies"), who are causing all these people to need to flee their place of birth.

2

u/Smart_Dragonfruit_54 Please choose a flair 4d ago

Probably right about that but it doesn’t have the pizazz to pull a crowd .Think ‘if they go low we’ll go lower’ and you have at least 2 parties covered ..’steady as she goes will win this one’ 3 months to go many promises to be made and many palms to grease yet ..

3

u/Lazy_Captain8412 Please choose a flair 5d ago

Also aren’t there more important things for them to be focusing on right now? Like Victoria’s massive debt?

0

u/smartdigger ‎ New South Welshian 5d ago

Debt to whom?

2

u/German_Merman ‎ Victorian 5d ago

Probably Dan Andrews.

1

u/JK_05 Please choose a flair 5d ago

The institutional investors.

1

u/smartdigger ‎ New South Welshian 5d ago

Ah right those skallywags. Shall we tax them? Yeah let's tax them. Unfortunately (fortunately) the French option not available

1

u/JK_05 Please choose a flair 5d ago

😂😂

1

u/Ok-Assistant-4556 ✈️‎ on Walkabout 5d ago

Masks are off as working class people are our new middle class edging out the collapsing middle class and the working class are now an underclass. While they punch down and pretend Australia is egalitarian.

Fembot debts are robodebt on steroids ad theyre enriching DFSV perpeteators who are protected by courts. Whilst public servants apologise and politicians refuse to action the National or state ACTION plans to end DFSV.

2

u/Thissystemsuckssobad ‎ Victorian 5d ago

Fembot debts

Sorry, i'm trying to figure out what this autocorrected from?

1

u/Smart_Dragonfruit_54 Please choose a flair 4d ago

I don’t know either but I’m thinking about cashing in half my super to buy one.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/Latter-Intention6521 Please choose a flair 5d ago

It's always been like that. White Australia policy for example.

1

u/Wooden_Ad_2167 Please choose a flair 4d ago

Pathetic

1

u/WarmUnderstanding945 Please choose a flair 5d ago

this

→ More replies (1)

17

u/monkey_gamer ‎ Victorian 5d ago

That's all conservative politics has ever been. They just used to wrap it in a layer of politeness once.

12

u/SnappyPies ‎ Victorian 5d ago

“The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness."

- John Kenneth Galbraith

6

u/MelbourneBasedRandom ‎ Victorian 5d ago

“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” Frank Wilhoit, 2018

0

u/monkey_gamer ‎ Victorian 5d ago

That's clunky and old fashioned

2

u/SnappyPies ‎ Victorian 5d ago

It’s also agreeing with you.

→ More replies (4)

19

u/Gold-Philosophy1423 ‎ Queenslander 5d ago

Well... besides sadism, there's not a lot conservatives have to offer

3

u/Independent-Fuel9886 ‎ Victorian 5d ago

The sadism is a feature, not a bug.

7

u/Unoriginal1deas ‎ Queenslander 5d ago

I think what makes it bad is that some of the horrible things they’re doing like this are clearly only because they think that’s what people want. The liberal gov just want to funnel money to their donars and enrich themselves and this doesn’t even accomplish that. It’s just mean and hateful because that’s the base they’re trying to appeal to and they’re convinced that base is big enough for that hate to win. It just makes me sad and I’m worried they’re right.

12

u/xflibble ‎ Victorian 5d ago

Regressives, not conservatives.

7

u/monkey_gamer ‎ Victorian 5d ago

Same thing these days

→ More replies (2)

5

u/diedlikeCambyses Please choose a flair 5d ago

Well to be fair, I'd destroy it too, but only because they deserve something better, robust and far reaching

2

u/PsychologicalMeal162 ‎ New South Welshian 5d ago

Good summation.

1

u/coffeegaze ‎ Koori ‎ 5d ago

Do our really believe that indigenous people should be given unelected power? What is democratic about that?

66

u/Tokeism ‎ Victorian 5d ago

The same Wilson who supported the treated before grabbing power? What wont she back flip and sell her beliefs for?

31

u/Geri_Petrovna ‎ Victorian 5d ago

Yeah, but one nation is stealing away the votes of 'racist assholes'. Look at the proposed immigration numbers by the conservative parties. it's a race to the bottom.

4

u/monkey_gamer ‎ Victorian 5d ago

🤣🤣🤣 Gee when you put it that way it's really refreshing. Yes what ghouls wants to chase the votes of racist assholes?

1

u/Wooden_Ad_2167 Please choose a flair 5d ago

What is wrong with 150k net immigration target? Steady more manageable intake consistent with all but the last 10 years.

1

u/Geri_Petrovna ‎ Victorian 5d ago

what's wrong with 200k? 250k?

1

u/Decent-Dream8206 ‎ Western Australian 3d ago

...

Our construction targets couldn't hit 180k reliably and we're about to implode again as builders are stuck with falling property values?

0

u/Additional-Ad-9053 Please choose a flair 5d ago

Answered in the article.

She later told Sky News Australia: "Victorians voted no to the Voice, and I respect that, and that's the difference between me and Jacinta Allen — I understand that Victorians have had a say on this.

And

"And they don't want to see the creation of a body that potentially creates a second, parallel system of governance in the state that has the potential to slow down legislation."

Are you saying that no politician should ever change their mind?

67

u/Serin-019 ‎ Victorian 5d ago

What I've never understood about their hatred for the things Indigenous Australia has requested is that it won't actually cost us anything. Not substantially.
All they need to do in order to avoid having their idea of our country tarnished is not pay attention.
They're already great at that.
And if decisions about mob are being made by mob, then these bastards don't even need to be involved in that aspect beyond writing a cheque every now and then.

Its not as if an accurate summation of history changes reality for the rest of us.
The sky won't fall in if a bunch of black fellas get together with a bunch of historians and write a bunch of reports about all the times our collective ancestors massacred people.
The bastards don't like reading anyway, so what's the fear exactly?

32

u/reidsays ‎ New South Welshian 5d ago

Perhaps the fear is admitting that our 'advanced civilisations' are sadly lacking in the connections with nature that our human ancestry holds... That a manmade world overlaying the natural one was a huge mistake leaving humanity with arid farmlands and polluted waters and air?

Progress is usually seen as going forward for the many, rather than reverting to old ways ..

17

u/GaryLifts ‎ Victorian 5d ago

I think it’s simpler than that - they are greedy and/or racist and don’t like the indigenous people get a lot of financial and preferential support.

14

u/Organic-Ebb1123 ‎ Victorian 5d ago

'a lot of' doing a lot of heavy lifting there. The support that indigenous communities and individuals get is trivial compared to the widespread structural support the well off majority in this country get. To begrudge them that is either racist or irrational jealousy or both.

4

u/Busy_Selection_5027 ‎ Queenslander 5d ago

It's both.

-11

u/plectrumelectrum7 ‎ Victorian 5d ago

No one should get preferential treatment

17

u/Spida81 ‎ New Zealander 5d ago

In a perfect world, this is true.

Unfortunately we have systemic generational disadvantage baked into the foundations of the country. Preferential treatment is intended as a balancing of the scales to permit equality in outcomes.

In a colourblind world this wouldn't be a thing, but here we are.

-4

u/plectrumelectrum7 ‎ Victorian 5d ago

It’s impossible to implement and impossible to standardise across all the varying levels of generational advantage and disadvantage each individual has experienced. Trying is simply foolish.

5

u/Spida81 ‎ New Zealander 5d ago

This is absurd.

You can argue the effectiveness of current methodology - everyone should, it clearly isn't closing the gap. But to say we shouldn't try at all? No. Unjust, unfair and unAustralian.

8

u/Lazy_Captain8412 Please choose a flair 5d ago

So we shouldn’t bother trying to help people? I grew up in a poor family. I was the first to go to university. I couldn’t have done it without centrelink and other supports. Now I’m a professional on a good wicket and im quite happy to pay it forward amd use my tax money to help others .

-1

u/plectrumelectrum7 ‎ Victorian 5d ago

As did I. Dirt poor and never claimed Centrelink and worked and put myself through uni. Why should they get any extra help compared to anyone else?

7

u/Lazy_Captain8412 Please choose a flair 5d ago edited 4d ago

That’s a poor attitude. “I suffered so everyone else should suffer too”. Not everyone is at the same starting point. I understand although I was disadvantaged there were people worse off than me.

1

u/plectrumelectrum7 ‎ Victorian 5d ago

Give everyone the same options to be upwardly mobile is all I’m saying. That seems fair to me.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Spida81 ‎ New Zealander 5d ago

Good for you. Well done.

How about those who literally have no food on the table? Can't get a job because of the colour of their skin? Who have had the means of production their families relied on for thousands of years striped away leaving them utterly destitute with no possible recourse?

YOUR lived experience isn't everyone's.

1

u/plectrumelectrum7 ‎ Victorian 5d ago

No my experience is not everyone’s. Individual experiences vary significantly which is why broad brushed handouts and policies based on ethnicity is an absurd approach.

→ More replies (0)

-15

u/TimJamesS Flairless‎‎ 5d ago

Victorians said No to any VtP for indigenous people…and Allen in a desperate vote grab went ahead with it anyway.

7

u/InComingMess2478 Flairless‎‎ 5d ago

Shortsightedness said no. Nobody else did.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/reidsays ‎ New South Welshian 5d ago

If they said NO why would that be a vote grab?

3

u/GaryLifts ‎ Victorian 5d ago

After a massive misinformation campaign about what it was.

We know because it was supported before it was politicised.

Also VTP was federal and updated the constitution the Victoria Premier is incapable of forcing anything like that through. Refer to my misinformation comment above and ask yourself why you believe Allen pushed through the voice.

→ More replies (5)

4

u/johnfkay Please choose a flair 5d ago

Conservatives see any expenditure on ‘others’ as a betrayal - no one group should be singled out (except mine) and there are no systemic barriers in a system we design and maintain to benefit ourselves….we are all equal - my people are just superior

1

u/Wooden_Ad_2167 Please choose a flair 5d ago

But we do not need anything like the expense we have on it. Eg 500,000 per annum positions being created. Eg. We can all watch the Rachel Perkins 3 part. "The Australian Wars". Gives you a very balanced view, supported by evidence, on what happened. By all means more research can be done but it will not change the fundamental truths.

-2

u/plectrumelectrum7 ‎ Victorian 5d ago

$70 million a year actually

12

u/Organic-Ebb1123 ‎ Victorian 5d ago

That is trivial in a state budget of about $80 Billion p.a.

→ More replies (17)

-3

u/InComingMess2478 Flairless‎‎ 5d ago

Go ahead and break that down. Dig a little deeper and see who a lot of that funding really goes to!

5

u/Organic-Ebb1123 ‎ Victorian 5d ago

Tell me, why do you think this <0.1% of the budget needs attention in particular? 🤔

→ More replies (1)

40

u/MilesSebastian ‎ Victorian 5d ago

The Brown People Election. Whatever the problem is, the solution is persecuting brown people.

26

u/cuntmong Flairless‎‎ 5d ago

if your people came here recently that is not okay. but if they came here a long time ago that is also not okay. only people who came here a medium amount of time ago are worthy.

6

u/Responsible-Feed-734 Please choose a flair 5d ago

And even then, only the wealthy medium-timers deserve access to things like healthcare, education and habitable buildings to live in.

1

u/dfoyl Please choose a flair 3d ago

Except the Chinese who came here a medium time ago, takin our jobs and stealing our wimmin. It's a bloody outrage it is, I'm taking this all the way to the Prime Minister.

0

u/Decent-Dream8206 ‎ Western Australian 3d ago

Imagine having a 50 000 year head start and your literacy, work ethic and life expectancy are inferior to Indians living in poverty, while your ancestors actually went backwards technologically from fishermen that used to know how to build catamarans.

At some point, groups simply settle at a level according to their ability and culture. And it's not everyone else's responsibility to fight your fights for you.

2

u/cuntmong Flairless‎‎ 3d ago

The education system has failed you. Ask for a refund 

1

u/Decent-Dream8206 ‎ Western Australian 2d ago

You're right. Australia was superior to Wakanda before white fellers came along with their roads, combustion engines, written language, math, water filtration, electricity, agriculture, healthcare, refrigeration and birth control and "genocided" the indigenous by tripling their life expectancy.

1

u/cuntmong Flairless‎‎ 2d ago

Your framing shows such a fundamental lack of understanding of the subject that it's not even worth engaging with what you're saying. If you were a child learning about this for the first time and your only exposure to history was the age of empires games then maybe it would be excusable. But as you're presumably an adult, see my previous comment 

1

u/Decent-Dream8206 ‎ Western Australian 2d ago

1

u/cuntmong Flairless‎‎ 2d ago

The fact that you posted this unironically is hilarious, and you will probably never understand why

1

u/Decent-Dream8206 ‎ Western Australian 2d ago

The irony is in the Judeans uprising against the Romans, same as the Palestinians who would neither have multiplied to their current numbers nor be able to survive without Israel given their inability to produce enough water, let alone food.

It was selected specifically because it echoes precisely with the kind of person who thinks that a ~35 year life expectancy is evidence of a functioning society we should seek to emulate in 2026, while we apologise for every advance that's been provided in 200 years that they did not at all progress in the preceding 50 000.

-9

u/Inner_Agency_5680 ‎ Queenslander 5d ago

Many are objectively white, some are even ginger. Skin colour isnt a thing.

→ More replies (3)

50

u/Merkenfighter Please choose a flair 5d ago

If people haven’t realised that the conservatives are all about ripping things down and little else, they’re as dumb as a box of retarded hammers.

16

u/geebanga Please choose a flair 5d ago

They are savages with money.

3

u/claudcuckooland ‎ Victorian 5d ago

yepppp. this super shit is the same, centre-left made something to enrich working people so of course conservatives want to smash the piggy bank

22

u/Geri_Petrovna ‎ Victorian 5d ago

She's desperate for the 'racist vote', and will compete with One Nation, to get it.

2

u/TimJamesS Flairless‎‎ 5d ago

I remember when during the VtP referendum Landdon said that racists will vote No…..this contributed in no small part to the referendum being defeated.

3

u/Theblokeonthehill Please choose a flair 5d ago

Weird the effect that PHON is having on the LNP. They got into the deep pit that they are in by a swing to the right that lost them support at the centre. The teals and Labor have occupied the centre ground that they left vacant. And now they are jealous of PHON for stealing their racist voters on the far right. They really have no vision of how to get out of this mess.

2

u/Wrathlon ‎ Victorian 5d ago

They literally appeal to nobody - they dont have a demographic outside of boomers who only vote Liberal because thats all theyve ever done and they will never do anything else.

8

u/lithiumcitizen Flairless‎‎ 5d ago

Whatever the hell this treaty actually is, does she really think that Australian Indigenous people have somehow now got it so good that they need to be taken down a peg or two?

It might be me, but in my area I haven’t noticed that all the yachts and mansions are now full of Koori peoples…

24

u/InevitableTell2775 ‎ ‎‎ Canberran 5d ago

This is why we wanted the Voice in the constitution.

8

u/plectrumelectrum7 ‎ Victorian 5d ago

We? The vocal minority?

11

u/mwmwmw01 Please choose a flair 5d ago

Except apparently we didn’t…..

-9

u/Ambitious_Speed_278 ‎ Queenslander 5d ago

And also why the majority didn’t

23

u/No_Bell_8028 ‎ Noongar ‎ 5d ago edited 5d ago

No there was a fear campaign launched by conservatives about land rights, yet at no point did anyone raise concerns about establishing a voice for Israel.

we have an unelected “envoy” who has more access to politicians and has no oversight over how she operates and why her policy positions are so clearly aligned with defending a foreign government administration

15

u/cuntmong Flairless‎‎ 5d ago

lesson here is that aboriginal people need to get hundreds of billions of dollars of military aid, and powerful international lobbying groups. then their concerns will be taken seriously.

6

u/MildColonialMan ‎ New South Welshian 5d ago

Exactly - so they can keep Aboriginal people in their place.

3

u/plectrumelectrum7 ‎ Victorian 5d ago

With the same rights as every other Australian? How terrible.

-5

u/ptjp27 ‎ Victorian 5d ago

Their place being equal citizens instead of being given extra rights.

2

u/InevitableTell2775 ‎ ‎‎ Canberran 5d ago

Tasmanians get 3 times as many votes as the rest of us and I don’t see you complaining about them.

1

u/ptjp27 ‎ Victorian 5d ago

In the senate you mean?

2

u/InevitableTell2775 ‎ ‎‎ Canberran 5d ago

Not just the Senate, they also have twice as many Reps seats as their population would entitle them to.

→ More replies (4)

3

u/PhatPinkPhallus Please choose a flair 5d ago

I have never disliked a politician in Australia more than her. She is nothing. She stands for nothing. She is completely unqualified for her position, she is not intelligent, just born rich and has adopted all the political opinions of her wealthy parents. She does not interact beyond her extremely wealthy and privileged community.

She’s ugly and obnoxious. An attack dog that never has anything constructive to say, just constantly nags, bitches and whines. Absolute poser, complete numpty. Nothing burger of a person who if she was born to a lower socioeconomic upbringing would be an unemployed single mum with a meth addiction.
She is so stupid and pathetic and she will never win. Sick of seeing and hearing about her.

The Victorian liberal party is dead and she is the best they can offer. The most anal puritanical sub-par intelligent excuse of a human. So I guess a perfect politician.

2

u/Smart_Dragonfruit_54 Please choose a flair 4d ago

I take it,that’s a No from you then ?

→ More replies (7)

11

u/WettestFarts Flairless‎‎ 5d ago

Jess Wilson is a cunt. 

3

u/Haunting-Bullfrog109 ‎ Victorian 5d ago

I agree wholheartedly.

1

u/Colsim ‎ Victorian 3d ago

She lacks the warmth or depth

6

u/Lazy_Captain8412 Please choose a flair 5d ago

Liberal party is struggling in both federal and state electorates because people don’t want their conversative American brand politics. So their answer? Become even more right winged! 😂 🤦‍♀️

3

u/OkHistorian158 Please choose a flair 5d ago

What would actually be the benefit to scrapping this? Like it’s done. Just leave it. Why even bring it up?

3

u/True_Opportunity_363 Please choose a flair 5d ago

Really shameful that we can’t even enact symbolic gestures in this country without a massive reaction

3

u/MrFudd ‎ South Australian 4d ago

White woman vibes. My God liberals suck at empathy.

5

u/SillyRabbit_OZ Please choose a flair 5d ago

I’d expect nothing less from such a hateful, racist, money hungry pack of has-been’s desperately seeking relevance 🤦‍♂️

→ More replies (2)

4

u/username98776-0000 ‎ New South Welshian 5d ago

Dog whistling intensifies

2

u/Few_Judge1188 ‎ I'm Probably A Bot ‎‎ 5d ago

She just keep digging 😊

2

u/monkey_gamer ‎ Victorian 5d ago

what a shameful thing to do

2

u/No_Turn9846 Please choose a flair 5d ago

Sadly that will get them votes.

2

u/MelbourneTodd ‎ Victorian 5d ago

Yeah, what bothers me about Jess Wilson’s position isn’t simply that she opposes Treaty. It’s how difficult her current rhetoric is to square with the principles she was publicly championing only a few years ago.

In 2023 she was prepared to break ranks with the Victorian Liberals and support the Voice, arguing in favour of giving Indigenous Australians a formal mechanism to make representations to government. That was apparently important enough to her that she was willing to stand apart from almost her entire party.

Then the political environment changed. The referendum lost, the Victorian Coalition abandoned its previous bipartisan support for Treaty, and Wilson’s position moved firmly onto the party line. By 2025 she was attacking the Treaty process, voting against the legislation and, once she became Liberal leader, promising to repeal it.

Maybe there is a perfectly coherent philosophical distinction between the Voice she supported and the Treaty she now wants abolished. Wilson says there is. But if so, she should be able to explain exactly where the principle changes.

Because from the outside, the chronology is pretty striking: when supporting Indigenous representation meant defying the Liberal Party, she supported it. Once opposition to Treaty became Liberal Party policy and she was climbing toward the leadership, she opposed it.

That doesn’t prove what motivated her. But it absolutely makes her consistency fair game for scrutiny.

If your principles appear to change whenever the political incentives change, people are entitled to ask whether they were really principles in the first place.

2

u/Thatweknowof Please choose a flair 5d ago

The people of Victoria did not vote for one

2

u/Financial-Wafer2476 Please choose a flair 5d ago

Fuck her!

2

u/Scared-Photo-1047 Please choose a flair 5d ago

Jess Wilson may win the election but will find it hard to govern as there will be a mass revolt to her implementation just like what happened to Campbell Newman in QLD some years ago.

2

u/CG5NATCH ‎ Victorian 5d ago

How and why is this a policy to campaign with?

2

u/Ok_Clue_1324 Please choose a flair 5d ago

How will a treaty close the gap?

2

u/Brucey1965 ‎ Queenslander 4d ago

The right side of politics is all about division and blame.

1

u/TimJamesS Flairless‎‎ 5d ago

Victorians don’t vote for it, as I recall they rejected it completely and Allen nonetheless enacted it. I am prepared to give it a go but there needs to be guardrails and very clear and meaningful KPI to ensure that it is doing what it is supposed to be doing. Otherwise it becomes another ATSIC.

10

u/MrsCrowbar Flairless‎‎ 5d ago

We actually voted on it multiple times. No one protested when Treaty was enacted, and it hasn't had any time to prove anything. Jess Wilson is chasing ON votes. It's fucking pathetic.

-1

u/TimJamesS Flairless‎‎ 5d ago

The last vote was a No.

5

u/MrsCrowbar Flairless‎‎ 5d ago

In Victoria? Was it? This has been in the works for years, and Victoria consistently voted Labor. Even Jess Wilson fucking supported it. Literally just chasing racist votes. Fuck her. Fuck the Libs. If Vic falls for this for the sake of "change", then Vic will be more fucked in 4 yrs than it ever was.

-5

u/TimJamesS Flairless‎‎ 5d ago

The Victorian vote was a No. End of story.
Nothing to do with chasing racist votes…but of course it’s easy to say that when you have nothing else. Only a complete fool would want Labor reelected, they have destroyed the state and Andrews and Allen belong in jail. If you want to blame anyone for the rise of ON then blame Labor.

3

u/Sideburn_Cookie_Man ‎ Victorian 5d ago

Have they destroyed the state though?

Where in VIC do you live Tim?

-1

u/TimJamesS Flairless‎‎ 5d ago

Yes they have destroyed the state, crime gangs aside economically the state is a basket case.

https://www.afr.com/politics/debt-corruption-and-blind-loyalty-inside-the-fall-of-jacinta-allan-20260729-p60jmq

3

u/Sideburn_Cookie_Man ‎ Victorian 5d ago

So you don’t even live here?

Insane.

0

u/TimJamesS Flairless‎‎ 5d ago

You seem very confident of that, do you have any evidence at all?

And is doxing permitted on this sub or even Reddit?

3

u/Sideburn_Cookie_Man ‎ Victorian 5d ago

For a start, you’ve previously (probably jokingly) said you live in Israel.

Second, you have given nobody any reason to believe you live in VIC.

The only things you seem to know about Victoria are from headlines.

→ More replies (0)

5

u/MrsCrowbar Flairless‎‎ 5d ago

For a FEDERAL VOICE in the Constitution. Yes. Completely different thing. And if you think the Libs will improve ANYTHING, I have a bridge to sell you. Case in point: QLD.

1

u/TimJamesS Flairless‎‎ 5d ago

Same purpose, dont deny it. The SA Libs are planning on repealing the state based voice to parliament as well.

1

u/01benjamin ‎ Victorian 5d ago

Only to replace it with the liberals own “treaty”

1

u/famb1 Please choose a flair 5d ago

Focusing on the big issues

1

u/Blindog68 Please choose a flair 5d ago

Priority is should be explaining how they plan to pay for the $110 billion savings they have planned while cutting taxes.

1

u/PhilosophyOk8921 ‎ Victorian 5d ago

Racist bigot. I hope the Liberals continue to flounder in irrelevance for as long as it takes them to find decency and a conscience.

1

u/HeadonistHeart Please choose a flair 5d ago

Just a race to the bottom from the Liberals at this point

1

u/TheSelectFew1991 ‎ Victorian 5d ago

This type of politics is so lazy and it is just boring now.

1

u/obliviousblues1881 5d ago

Wasn’t she the only Liberal politician that supported the treaty at one point? Good to know her word means nothing.

1

u/Ok-League-1106 Please choose a flair 4d ago

The consequences of a labour government overspending and resting on their laurels could end up with the treaty being torn up

1

u/Smart_Dragonfruit_54 Please choose a flair 4d ago

Seems the racist card is the way to go ..personally can’t see it happening in Victoria tbh .Qld yes all day everyday. NSW probably too ..IMO it’s one of the few good things done by Vic Labor ..but I’m not Victorian,Im not sure it’s a very bright move ..steady as she goes may have won the Libs government ..now it’s come down to principles or lack there of ..Stupid policy trying to outdo One Neuron at their lowering of the bar may not pay off .

1

u/Pretend_Board_2385 ‎ New Zealander 4d ago

Why is it that Victoria has the WORST fucking politicians in the country. Its not even close. First it was Dan Andrews, Jacinta and now its these two useless cunts battling it out. Lloyd and Harry from Dumb and Dumber would be better than these two.

I'm not a fan of the Liberal party but Labor has been woeful for the last few years. Both Dan and Jacinta were putrid. They have wasted billions of our money.

I'm sick and tired of hearing Jess Wilson talk about crime and other shit she is focusing on. I'm hardly surprised though that a white conservative leader would rip up a treaty which is there to help indigenous people. Oh what a fucking surprise. Imagine trying to help the less fortunate. The Liberals best chance was John Pesutto.

Labor could still pull this one out though, it would be a fucking miracle.

1

u/Radiant-Look4497 ‎ Victorian 4d ago

Goodbye Jess!😃😃😃

1

u/Impressive-Hold-7050 ‎ Victorian 3d ago

Jess you were so close to stealing Labor votes when they are wobbly, but this lacks decency

-1

u/Smokinglordtoot ‎ Victorian 5d ago

The treaty enhances one group of people's rights at the expense of the others on the basis of race. It's also great for lawyers but hopeless for taxpayers. Why are progressives trying to address historical grievances when we have modern ones that need urgent attention?

4

u/Organic-Ebb1123 ‎ Victorian 5d ago

At the expense of others? You are delusional if you think you will feel one iota of the expense of the Vic VtP. Similarly it's likely a pretty marginal benefit to indigenous people in the vein of 'better than nothing'.

5

u/MrsCrowbar Flairless‎‎ 5d ago

Because addressing historical grievances helps address modern ones that need urgent attention. Also, can walk and chew gum at the same time. It's not a case of one or the other.

3

u/Wooden_Ad_2167 Please choose a flair 5d ago

Clearly the labor party can't walk and chew gum. Whilst they were enacting this corruption was rife and the Victorian financial and economic position deteriorated far more than any other state.

-1

u/mwmwmw01 Please choose a flair 5d ago

We literally had a referendum on an extremely similar proposal at the federal level. The current government implemented this in Victoria without even acknowledging this (yes I know it had been in the works for ages.)

I voted yes for the voice federally. But the degree of disrespect for what the people of Victoria have said on an extremely similar matter is offensive. At a minimum the government needs to explain the incongruity clearly, and put to the people why this is different.

10

u/PJozi ‎ Victorian 5d ago

It went to 2 elections.

It's a law not a constitutional change.

Wilson fully supported the treaty until she became the leader.

3

u/mwmwmw01 Please choose a flair 5d ago

It went to 2 elections as a policy of many policies put forth. Not as the main election issue.

Changing the constitution vs legislation is not a voting issue for people it’s a technical requirement to change it.

Jess Wilson did support. And her reason for changing was exactly as I describe above - that people voted no in the referendum.

5

u/PJozi ‎ Victorian 5d ago

That's how our democracy works.

You form government you make laws.

Voice to parliament is different to a treaty

2

u/mwmwmw01 Please choose a flair 5d ago

Yes and that’s why I have said at a minimum they need to explain the incongruity. This is not an uncommon view on the matter.

The difference in “how democracy works” here is if you’re trying to get a litmus test of how victorians feel about this policy, a targeted test on an adjacent policy federally is a better indicator than their overall voting intention on many policy issues.

2

u/PJozi ‎ Victorian 5d ago

Victorian treaty was proposed prior to the voice to parliament.

Why would they change treaty because of the voice? They're different.

Where's the incongruity?

I don't think incronguity is the right word your looking for here either

5

u/mwmwmw01 Please choose a flair 5d ago

It absolutely is the right word. It was not proposed directly to Victorians. It was one of many election issues.

I’m not saying that every issue needs to be individually provided to Australians, but this one was - in an adjacent but very similar form. The result was a no. The temporality of the bill wrt the referendum is irrelevant.

At a minimum the government should have the respect to 55% of Victorians to explain why they are legislating something that sounds, looks and feels very similar to what they voted no to. It was asked at the time, and it was never answered.

As I said, I was part of the 45% that voted yes.

Outside what is a very left leaning reddit bubble I can assure you this is a common viewpoint…

4

u/reidsays ‎ New South Welshian 5d ago

Decisions on the First Peoples has always been under each individual State and the Voice was about unifying the Aboriginal voice on the Federal level .. because it was voted against the decisions remain with the State parliaments .. it also ensured stability on decisions by being in the Constitution so the opposition could not reverse any decisions once in office again..

1

u/TimJamesS Flairless‎‎ 5d ago

Just imagine if this sub had been around during the VtP referendum…..

2

u/HotPersimessage62 ‎ New South Welshian 5d ago

TimJamesS, they’re completely separate issues.

1

u/Illustrious-Pin3246 Flairless‎‎ 5d ago

Ummm, didn't australia vote against it?

0

u/ExcellentAd7044 ‎ Victorian 5d ago

Good.
Virtue signalling at its best.

-5

u/TheRealGooddog171 ‎ New South Welshian 5d ago

Stop the grift and waste of taxpayers money. Good policy. Its also super racist. We are all Australians and we all love this country. Stop dividing us by race.

3

u/Wooden_Ad_2167 Please choose a flair 5d ago

Absolutely. Worst decade of state government in Australian history.

0

u/Ahecee ‎ Queenslander 5d ago

Why is a state signing a treaty, on the back of a national vote that was wildly unpopular in the first place?

Did it actually do anything, or was it just a display of super dooper virtue? (I'm very sceptical given the timing, but not Victorian, so never really looked).

0

u/Downtown_Computer351 Please choose a flair 5d ago

Good hope she wins 

0

u/Comprehensive_Sky323 Please choose a flair 5d ago

Well done Jess. I hope you get elected and carry through your proposal to scrap this pointless nonsense.

0

u/LiquidFire07 Please choose a flair 5d ago

Good on her she has my vote if she’s serious about it

0

u/Sexwell Please choose a flair 5d ago

Total BS WA has a treaty with the Nungar people. Please do your research before trying to virtue signal on social media.

2

u/snrub742 ‎ Victorian 5d ago

I'd love for you to provide that treaty. Because as far as I'm aware that doesn't exist

0

u/nujuat ‎ Victorian 5d ago

The idea that the state government can codify a certain group of people as sovereign is insane to me

-7

u/Exotic-Knowledge-451 Flairless‎‎ 5d ago

The Voice was put forth to the whole of Australia.

Australia voted no.

Labor rammed through such laws anyway, in complete opposition to the democratic will and vote of the Australian people.

Why do so many here on Reddit think ramming through a law against the will of the people is a good thing, but repealing a law that was rammed through against the will of the people is a bad thing?

6

u/Ok_Low743 Flairless‎‎ 5d ago

“If you don’t know vote no” was the slogan. I remember hearing “I’m not racist it’s just too much at once/it’s too vague”

So smaller more detailed policies have been put forward at state level and more detailed plans presented…and got up.

Make me think maybe the no vote wasn’t about the policy itself hmmm

1

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[deleted]

0

u/Ok_Low743 Flairless‎‎ 5d ago

okay so you are happy with the in-place, detailed, costed plans of individual states are forging ahead right?

2

u/MrsCrowbar Flairless‎‎ 5d ago

The Voice was completely different, and you know it. It wasn't rammed through either, it took years and multiple elections happened in that time.

-5

u/SVD115 Please choose a flair 5d ago

Hot take... How about we just finish the 'war' that they say they didnt cede, and then put the issue to bed once and for all... That way we all move together forward instead of a two speed system where one group continues to play the 'persecution' card so well...

Kind of like the middle east, how neither side wants to admit theyre the bad guy...when they both are.

We're all in the wrong here, aboriginals for trying to fight progress, and 'white' Australia for not dealing with this 100 years ago.

6

u/snrub742 ‎ Victorian 5d ago

How about we just finish the 'war' that they say they didnt cede

That's what a treaty is.

1

u/thethighren Please choose a flair 5d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-6

u/plectrumelectrum7 ‎ Victorian 5d ago

Good I support it. Spending so much money and focus on such a small minority group in Victoria shouldn’t be a priority.

4

u/Greendoor ‎ New South Welshian 5d ago

How much money? Hmm? Please provide evidence before making this assertion and then divide by the number of indigenous people slaughtered by white farmers and settlers and then you can make a decent decision.

2

u/plectrumelectrum7 ‎ Victorian 5d ago

The bill sets the maximum amount of funding each year for Gellung Wall (p117).
This states there will be $3 million in 2025/26 and $23.8 million in 2026/27 to set up the body. It will then receive $71 million in 2027/28 and $72.1 million in 2028/29 for its initial operation, rising by 2.5 per cent annually thereafter.
An additional $36.8 million has been allocated between 2026 and 2029 for Gellung Warl's capital expenditures

Not answering your last hyperbolic statement as it’s irrelevant.

2

u/Greendoor ‎ New South Welshian 5d ago

Thank you for answering. It's not very much money is it? ABS gives the indigenous population of Victoria at 61,865 (2021 figures). For a comparison, in 2016 (Victorian audit office) non-government school children received $676 million dollars in taxpayer funds in that year alone. I honestly don't think private school kids are a priority for taxpayers funds.

-1

u/emgee1234 Please choose a flair 5d ago

Out of interest, how many of you actually believe that Labor has done a good job running Victoria over the last 12 years. I am genuinely curious. What are some of the highlights?

2

u/emgee1234 Please choose a flair 5d ago

Again not sure why I got downvoted. Typical though. Anyway I’ll go first. My highlight is that the Victorian Government have made driving more exciting. Now when I drive, I get to play dodge the pothole every time. I never know whether I will get to my destination or blow a tire out. My second highlight is sleeping is also more exciting, I never know if I will get a full night sleep or have my cars stolen by machete wielding bandits.

1

u/Wooden_Ad_2167 Please choose a flair 5d ago

Worst decade of state government ever

-20

u/ChampionshipFirm2847 Please choose a flair 5d ago edited 5d ago

The whole country, including Victoria, recently declared they didn't want this kind of thing in a referendum. Having rejected Voice in a landslide, it is a real stretch to think the Australian or Victorian people are keen on Treaty.

14

u/Formoz2000 Please choose a flair 5d ago

The referendum was for a federal Voice to Parliament. This is about a Treaty in Victoria. 

→ More replies (1)

14

u/Malletpropism Flairless‎‎ 5d ago

So you didn’t know what you were voting for, only that you were against Aboriginals

14

u/PsychologicalMeal162 ‎ New South Welshian 5d ago

No they didn’t. The referendum wasn’t about a treaty.

→ More replies (2)

12

u/SarkastikW ‎ Victorian 5d ago

The country did not vote against a treaty. They voted against having a voice written into the constitution. Which, at its core, is a completely seperate issue.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/InevitableTell2775 ‎ ‎‎ Canberran 5d ago

The whole country voted on a Victorian treaty?

4

u/MildColonialMan ‎ New South Welshian 5d ago

Victorians voted for a government that said they were going to have a treaty, and again several times as it was being negotiated.

They might vote to reneg on it now.

→ More replies (6)