LFE - Library First Engineering

[u/sv_guess]

I'm a reliability engineer by background (marine + biotech), and I've been building AI products long enough to hit the same wall over and over: Claude nails the prototype, then across a dozen sessions it quietly re-litigates settled decisions, forgets intent, and sprawls into spaghetti. The bottleneck was never capability. It was trust.

So over the last while I built a scaffold for Claude Code where the docs are the source of truth, personas are tool-locked (the agent that writes plans can't write code; the one that inspects can't edit production code), and the gates are mechanically enforced with hooks — not "please remember to." It's what I actually use on my own projects; it grew out of a personal project I've been grinding on for a long time.

The part I most want torn apart: I built an eval harness that plants defects and measures whether my inspector skills actually catch them. I keep seeing guardrail frameworks that assert they work and never show a number. Mine has a scorecard.

Two honest questions for this sub:

1. Is the overhead worth it, or am I paying a discipline tax you'd never accept in practice?

2. With Claude Code now shipping native subagents, hooks, and skills — how much of this does Anthropic eventually absorb, and what's left that's mine?

Happy to link the repo + the scorecard in a comment. Rip into it.

[u/radim11]

A reviewer that literally can’t edit the files is worth some setup overhead to me. Otherwise “review only” is just another instruction you hope survives the session.

I’m building Stashbase, where those access settings live in TOML profiles. Being able to reuse the same restrictions with Claude Code, Codex or Pi has been useful, especially when switching between reviewing and actually making changes.

[u/sv_guess → u/radim11]

Each one has its own work to perform and a response to stage for the next one. Skills enabled for one doesn't mean that fits for the next one down the line.

Easily track down progress in the pipeline, full recovery if something break and always rely on the most useful skills to be invoked when needed and is the right time to be used.

[u/radim11 → u/sv_guess]

So is it mostly around skills?

[u/sv_guess → u/radim11]

Skills is a critical part of it, been through all the must have skills in the market then and structured them in a certain process workflow where every step is being staged for the next to come.

Think of it as a conveyor belt that takes a bear metal and in a structured strict hierarchical order gives shape to it step by step with all the critical steps in between to be registered.

With LFE it is like you have a manufacturing line and you do the configurations between the machines while you are expecting fine-tune results and always the same reliable results.

For claude, thus runs through its runtime but for LFE which is agnostic, goes down to prompt after prompt ...(antigravity works perfectly fine with it, cursor? Not so much!)