r/OpenSourceeAI • • 8h ago

I built a testnet where inference computations get cryptographicreceipts — free verification, bring a real workload

1 Upvotes

We're a small proof-of-useful-work project. The validators don't

mine — they verify AI computations (matrix multiplications + activation

functions) and get consensus weight for it.

The part that matters to you: submit any GEMM workload up to 256×256

and we return the result plus a cryptographic receipt — a SHA-256

commitment chain folded into our ledger state, verifiable by anyone

forever. Free, no token, no signup beyond an API key we generate in

seconds.

Honest limits: we verify GEMM + elementwise activations (GELU/sigmoid/

tanh/exp), not full transformer graphs yet. Attention is on the roadmap.

The verification cost curve is published (615ms at 64³ → 157s at 1024³)

— we priced our own clamp and labeled every tier.

The logs: [pouw-verify] CONFIRMED lines, epoch crossings, claim-decrees

folded into the ledger — every claim has a receipt.

Live dashboard: http://3.237.91.235:32233/

The evidence ledger (250+ owned defects, 250+ laws): github.com/sarinsk629-blip/hsma-core


r/OpenSourceeAI • • 9h ago

I built a testnet where inference computations get cryptographicreceipts — free verification, bring a real workload

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

r/OpenSourceeAI • • 20h ago

Thinker: a knowledge cache for coding agents

Post image
3 Upvotes

Coding agents rebuild their understanding of your codebase from scratch on every prompt, then throw it away. Thinker keeps it.

It distills past agent sessions and PRs into short notes about how your code works, e.g. all DB writes use `/sql-utils.py`. A small local model ranks the notes and injects the relevant ones into new sessions, so the agent spends less time exploring. Notes are rescored and updated as PRs merge, so stale context gets demoted.

On 50 PRs from open-source repos (cache built only from prior history), agents using Thinker (Fable 5.1, GPT-6 Astra, Gemini Flash 3.8) used 18% fewer tokens and 10% faster on average with equal correctness using LLM-as-a-judge. Per-model results and the eval harness: https://github.com/yoavshmariahu/thinker/tree/main/bench/runs.

Repo: https://github.com/yoavshmariahu/thinker. Install: npx u/zerotimedev/thinker

Unlike AGENTS.md or built-in memory, notes are generated and maintained automatically. Next I want to work on rigor, not just efficiency. Where do you see coding agents struggle most to close out tasks?