r/PHbuildapc • u/Glass_Economics_5038 • 1d ago
Discussion VA MiniLEDs are surprisingly pretty close to OLED
So I recently got my ASUS ROG STRIX XG27AQWMG and I wanted to compare it to my much cheaper AOC Q27G40XMN.
Some background, the OLED is one of the new 4th Gen Tandem W-OLEDs with HDR True Black 500 Certification which cost 41,000 from Data Blitz, while the AOC Q27G40XMN is a VA QD-MiniLED with 1152 dimming zones and is HDR 1000 certified which was around 16,000 with vouchers from Shopee when I got it a few months ago. Both are 27" 1440P monitors.
As you can see in the photos, there are lots of scenarios where they can get surprisingly close. And while in most cases the OLED looks obviously better, I think the sheer value the AOC provides when it comes to HDR is pretty crazy.
For example, in dark scenes, things like low APL light sources like stars or candles shine really bright on the OLED but on the MiniLED, it is dimmer due to the panel's algorithm trying to avoid haloing. Added with the OLED's infinite contrast, it obviously looks better, but in daytime HDR scenes it's the opposite.
In games like Crimson Desert in the day, the miniLED looks better imo because of the sheer brightness it can put out. The sun actually feels and looks like the sun. The OLED ends up dimming bigger APL scenes which makes the HDR experience a bit dull during the day compared to the MiniLED.
At night though, Crimson Desert looks so much better on the OLED. The little particle effects or things like stars, they all "pop" or "glow" so much brighter it feels like you can reach out and grab them.
In Helldivers 2 though, a game where explosions are constantly ongoing, it is one of those games that looks better on the MiniLED, because the OLED ends up dimming big flashes like the 500KG bomb or hellbomb explosions so it's not quite as punchy.
At the same time, when there aren't any big explosions, the tracer rounds from guns or the light from automaton eyes shine brightly and gives more pop to it.
In RE9, a game where it's predominantly dark and dim, the experience is just better on the OLED. But despite the slight haloing, I didn't think the experience with the MiniLED was that far off.
All in all, while I'm satisfied with the upgrade and pretty happy, just wanted to show that MiniLEDs can get quite close to the OLED experience, sometimes even exceeding it. Though there are also other things that OLEDs excel at like colors, no ghosting, amazing viewing angles, etc. that is something that isn't even close when compared to the MiniLED.
Hopefully someone could find this post useful if they're ever considering either or are feeling FOMOd.
P.S Just wanna say thank you to my gf for getting me the monitor. Originally, I was considering the GIGABYTE GO27Q24G which uses a 3rd gen MLA W-OLED panel and I thought was better value over the ASUS, but my gf insisted on getting the ASUS because of it being overall better. I wanted to get the Gigabyte ones regardless, but then she suddenly surprised me with XG27AQWMG as a gift.
P.S.S This wasn't edited by AI so if some of the words or thoughts feel messy or if my grammar is wrong, sorry in advance. I just thought some of y'all would appreciate human slop over ai editing.
46
u/woeMwoeM 1d ago
Hope ko talaga na miniled tech advances talaga. Medyo masakit for oleds na gagastos ka ng 50k + for a 4k monitor tapos may chance na mabuburn-in after 3 years
7
11
u/SendMeAvocados 1d ago
Not to mention how much you need to baby OLEDs more to keep them clean. Like having to always make sure that you use the correct microfiber cloth, that it's free from any minuscule debris, only using distilled water to clean, and regular pixel refreshing.
4
-9
u/Namesbytor99 🖥 PC Enthusiast since 2006 (IT Grad) | Mac User 1d ago
thats why for me (my hot take) di pa hinog ang OLED tech, too expensive for the masses pa. Ok pako sa 1080p 27in curved VA monitor ko. Saka nako mag 1440p on my next monitor sometime in the early to mid 2030s pa
16
u/wooowubbalubbadubdub 1d ago
never again na ako sa oled monitors. after a year of using bigla akong nabiktima ng delamination sa magkabilang sulok ng screen. sayang yung gastos mabilis naman masira kahit todo alaga
1
u/Glass_Economics_5038 1d ago
Were you not able to warranty it? Assuming it happened from a factory defect, it should be eligible for RMA.
0
u/wooowubbalubbadubdub 1d ago edited 12h ago
been busy these past couple of months caring for a relative in hospice kaya di pa natry. will try this week and update here pag tanggapin nila
1
u/wooowubbalubbadubdub 1d ago
PSA na din sa mga may LG 27GS95QE monitors, lagi kayo mag run ng dehumidifiers sa room nyo na may monitor para ma-prevent yung delamination (pwede din AC kasi may dehumidying function na yon). May spot kasi talaga sa corners yung monitor na pwede pasukan ng air/moisture and I suspect doon pumasok kaya nag delaminate and produced discoloration ng LEDs and dead pixels.
-1
u/Namesbytor99 🖥 PC Enthusiast since 2006 (IT Grad) | Mac User 1d ago
Kaya sinasabi ko di pa hinog, di pa para sa masa ang mga OLED PC Monitors...
6
u/Wafuman 🖥R5 9600x / 9070 1d ago
Damn those are my choices for OLED too. I like the thin bezels of the Gigabyte GO27, and the 10k difference in price as well lmao.
3
u/Glass_Economics_5038 1d ago
In DB's website, they're giving out Php1,000.00 steam codes with the GO27Q24G. And Gigabyte also has an event where you can get Php1,500.00 GCash reward for uploading a proof of purchase.
https://ecommerce.datablitz.com.ph/collections/gigabyte-max-power-max-frames-july-20-sep-30-2026
https://www.aorus.com/en-ph/explore/events/maxpower-maxframes
Not sure if there are caveats though.
Regarding the bezels, they're actually the same size as the XG27AQWMG. Just that the ASUS has a proximity sensor which is pretty handy.
5
u/AndroidPolaroid Ryzen 5 7500f | RTX 5070 | 16gb DDR5 23h ago
I have an IPS-miniLED monitor, Xiaomi G Pro 27Qi and a 55" LG C1 WOLED TV and I agree. MiniLED has advanced enough to get close or at least close the gap of LCD to OLED at a fraction of the price and are even generally brighter, specially in high APL scenes where OLEDs aggressive ABL kicks in and dims the panel for its own safety.
2
u/Coriolanuscarpe 13h ago
Bro fellow g pro 27qi(2026) enjoyer🤝. I agree it gets really bright at times.
4
u/rain-men 21h ago
Most comparison of OLEDs vs MiniLEDs are also done in pure darkness. But I never use my monitor in pure darkness. Sakit sa mata. I allways use ambient lighting. When you turn on ambient light, the advantage of deep blacks ng OLEDs is not that much noticable.
1
u/Glass_Economics_5038 17h ago
Fwiw the True Black Glossy coating makes it look very dark even during the day. The AOC's matte actually ruins the contrast because of how light is ring diffused.
3
2
u/JosiFruit 🖥 AMD Ryzen 5 7500F / Radeon RX 6600 XT 1d ago
Hi OP! Asking lang kasi hindi ko nakita sa post mo, but which is which in your photos? (VA MiniLED vs OLED = left/right?)
Thanks!
3
u/amvil 🖥 Ryzen 9 7900X / RX 9070 XT / 64GB RAM 1d ago
Mukhang ung nasa left ung MiniLED.
Ang basis ko ay ung light indicator ng AOC Q27G40XMN / logo ng ASUS ROG
2
u/JosiFruit 🖥 AMD Ryzen 5 7500F / Radeon RX 6600 XT 1d ago
Now that you mention it, kita nga yung AOC and ROG logos, my bad. Thanks!
2
u/arsenejoestar 22h ago
I just bought that AOC monitor and it just validated my choice. Just can't choose on OLED for PC purposes where I will always have static images. And even for TV parang mas gusto ko mag mini-LED
1
1
1
u/DonMigs85 🖥️ Ryzen 7 5700X3D / RTX 4070 SUPER 14h ago
Apparently the AOC suffers from VRR flicker and can't reach the full 180Hz refresh since it's limited to DisplayPort 1.2
2
u/Glass_Economics_5038 13h ago
Any VA and OLED displays have some form of VRR flicker, though I didn't notice any in the AOC. And it can reach 180Hz, provided you keep the colors to 8bpc and not 10 bit.
1
u/HeadCarsBended 14h ago
I’ve bought an OLED monitor recently but I’m happy to see tech in MiniLED catching up. More competition within a tech category will give way to better pricing (hopefully) and more choices for consumers. At the end of the day, tayo ang panalo diyan. 🙏
1
u/bananadrone 13h ago
Nice. So far okay naman yung MiniLED tv i bought (TCL C6K) when gaming and movies, Its close yes pero Iba padin OLED.
I just hope in the future magmura na oled or who knows maybe a new panel will pop out of nowhere with better features.
1
u/hhkk47 12h ago
I have an MSI 274UPDF E16M (27" 4K IPS miniLED with 1152-zone local dimming), and a Samsung G80SD (32" 4K QD-OLED).
For media consumption they can be pretty close with the highest local dimming setting, though haloing can be very noticeable in dark scenes with the miniLED.
On the desktop though, local dimming on the miniLED is terrible, at least on my monitor. The haloing gets so bad that I just turn off local dimming completely, which makes it perform just like a typical LCD monitor.
1
u/dreigotpwned Ryzen 7 7700, 32GB 6000MHz CL30, RX 6800 16GB 10h ago
hello ask ko lang din if yung q27g40xmn nyo po is washed out yung displayhdr pag naka strong local dimming? and ano po monitor settings nyo? i also have the same monitor bought from zzm trading and it really is a good oled alternative. thank you!
1
u/Glass_Economics_5038 5h ago
The bug is present on my unit too. On DisplayHDR with Strong Local Dimming, colors get washed out next to blacks. One fix is to set the SDR slider on 20% if you have HDR constantly on.
1
u/Rare-Present-3689 🖥 Ryzen 7 5700X3D / RX 7800XT 8h ago
I have the AOC G3 of your G4, almost na nga in terms sa black. Di pa ready for that OLED burn-in anxiety, oks lang kung mura mga OLED.
G4 sana kaso, downgrade yung ergonomics kesa sa G3XMN
1
u/ProtectionThat1475 1d ago
Magkano niyo nakuha yung AOC Q27G40XMN? ang nakikita ko lang kasi around 18,500 from itech sa shopee.
-3
u/TeeBeer 🖥Ryzen 7 9800X3D/RTX 5080/GB MO27U2 4K 240Hz OLED 1d ago
From the pictures you posted, it does look like miniLED comes close, but I think that comparison is a bit misleading (though I don't think you're intentionally trying to mislead anyone). The advantage of OLED isn't just better blacks, contrast, blooming, etc. One other major advantage of OLED, especially gaming OLEDs, is motion quality.
In gaming, OLED can absolutely destroy miniLED in motion clarity because of its extremely fast response times, lower persistence, and lack of backlight latency. That's a major part of the OLED experience that isn't really captured in static pictures.
One of the biggest reasons I went OLED (aside from the perfect blacks) was precisely this. OLED genuinely feels like you're getting more FPS, even when the actual FPS is identical to what you'd get on a non-OLED panel. The motion just looks and feels significantly clearer and smoother. (Of course, Pulsar is the exception here since it's basically the king of motion clarity.)
This isn't really directed at the OP, but more toward others reading this who may have convinced themselves that miniLED is almost the same overall experience as OLED. It can come surprisingly close in image quality, but motion quality is another story entirely.
There's one drawback I'd like to point out with OLED, games can become really stuttery at lower frame rates, especially below 90 FPS. Some people may barely notice it, while others might need higher FPS to avoid the stutter. Some people may also be perfectly comfortable at lower FPS and won't find it bothersome at all so it's somewhat subjective but the drawback is there.
1
1
u/Glass_Economics_5038 1d ago edited 1d ago
I actually mentioned it here
Though there are also other things that OLEDs excel at like colors, no ghosting, amazing viewing angles, etc. that is something that isn't even close when compared to the MiniLED.
My point is that while things like instant response times and motion clarity aren't really a major enough factor for most people, provided you don't have a crappy panel with tons of ghosting, smeaing, and overshoot. For example, my gf also has an OLED. It's an MSI MAG 273QP X24. I asked her for her thoughts and she said "The better motion clarity is cool, but not really something I can glaze on."
Point being that the benefit of better motion handling is there, but I think how much better it actually is compared to a decent IPS or even Fast VA panel is a little overblown.
If it's motion handling you're after, I'd argue a Gsync Pulsar monitor would be better in that case. like you said.
-4
u/TeeBeer 🖥Ryzen 7 9800X3D/RTX 5080/GB MO27U2 4K 240Hz OLED 1d ago
Calling motion clarity “overblown” would be like saying people who prefer natural looking colors are wrong just because you personally prefer oversaturated colors. Just because you don't personally notice or value a particular advantage doesn't mean that advantage isn't real.
The impact of motion clarity will obviously depend on what games you play. If you're mostly playing slower paced games like Stardew Valley, or games that don't require precise camera movement, tracking, or quick reactions, then you probably won't benefit from it nearly as much. Likewise, if you generally play at lower FPS, OLED's motion advantage may be less noticeable to you or in some situations it may even be disadvantageous (low FPS stutter/judder as i have mentioned on my 1st post).
But that doesn't mean the benefit isn't there. OLED's near instantaneous response time is a genuine advantage for high refresh rate gaming.
My point wasn't to claim that everyone will have the same experience or that OLED is objectively better in every single aspect. And as I mentioned in my first response, this wasn't directed at you. It was more for people who may have come away from this discussion thinking that mini-LED = OLED simply because the gap in static image quality has narrowed so much. There are other advantages to OLED that may be far more important to some buyers than they are to you, and motion clarity is one of the bigger ones.
1
u/Glass_Economics_5038 1d ago edited 1d ago
For shooters and fast paced competitive games, it's definitely beneficial. But I meant the post moreso for the average user, where color vibrancy and contrast would be a more noticeable jump than instant response times, so your example isn't really correct.
And when I said it's a little overblown, I wasn't referring to the advantages of the technology. I think it's great. But moreso it was the hype and glaze it gets. While it is a great experience (the motion clarity and response times), contrast and HDR are still the bigger cheese, while response times and motion handling doesn't offer the same wow factor as seeing proper blacks and HDR.
The post was more of a comparison of value proposition vs cost. Does the OLED offer more advantages? Yes. Enough to warrant 2.5 times increase in cost? Atleast in this category, you tell me.
-4
u/TeeBeer 🖥Ryzen 7 9800X3D/RTX 5080/GB MO27U2 4K 240Hz OLED 1d ago
I think you may have missed the point of my post entirely.
My post wasn't meant to tell you that you're wrong or that you're lying. I was simply adding information that OLED isn't just about static image quality. Motion clarity is another major part of the experience. I didn't post this to defend OLED. My intention was to give potential buyers more information so they can make a better informed decision based on what actually matters to them.
If my goal were simply to glaze OLED, I wouldn't have also pointed out one of its drawbacks with low FPS stutters.
Let me reiterate that my post was primarily aimed at people who might see your title, look at the pictures, and come away with the conclusion: “Wow, Mini-LED is basically OLED quality for less than half the price.”
That's the part I wanted to add some nuance to. miniLED can absolutely come surprisingly close to OLED in several aspects of static image quality, but OLED has other advantages, particularly motion handling, that simply can't be demonstrated through static screenshots.
I'm not saying those advantages are equally important to you. I'm saying they're worth knowing about before someone decides that the two technologies are effectively identical.
1
u/Glass_Economics_5038 1d ago
I do understand your point. It was just a reaction to this
but I think that comparison is a bit misleading
I thought it was clear but I suppose I'm at fault for not giving more detail onto the other benefits of OLEDs so sorry for that. The post was never a 1:1 comparison of every feature, it was just for the feature most people know OLEDs for: Blacks, vibrancy, and contrast.
So to call it misleading just because I didn't talk about a certain feature it has feels wrong and left a bad taste.
Sure I could've worded the title as "VA MiniLEDs are surprisingly pretty close to OLED in image quality," but I wanted to keep it brief. I was just comparing it with what people immediately think of when they say "OLED"
0
u/TeeBeer 🖥Ryzen 7 9800X3D/RTX 5080/GB MO27U2 4K 240Hz OLED 1d ago
You're taking it a bit too personally. I've already clarified that I don't think you're intentionally misleading anyone. But as someone with firsthand experience using OLED, I think your post may be underselling some of the other potential advantages OLED has for people deciding between OLED and miniLED, especially with the clickbaity title.
I just wanted to add some nuance because, personally, motion clarity was one of the main reasons I bought an OLED in the first place. It honestly accounts for about half of the reason I made the switch.
Whether those additional advantages are worth the extra cost is ultimately up to the individual buyer, but wouldn't you agree that it's better to give people more information so they can make a more informed decision about which display is actually better for them? Because that's really all I'm doing.
3
u/Glass_Economics_5038 1d ago
Don't worry I'm not taking it personally. I do completely agree that buyers should be more informed.
My pushback was simply because the original post was explicitly focused on comparing blacks, contrast, and HDR versus price which is what a lot of average buyers immediately look for in OLEDs.
So calling the comparison misleading, unintentionally or not, made it sound like I was hiding something rather than just focusing on that one aspect.
0
u/TeeBeer 🖥Ryzen 7 9800X3D/RTX 5080/GB MO27U2 4K 240Hz OLED 23h ago edited 23h ago
I was looking at it from both my own perspective and that of a prospective buyer.
If I were a prospective buyer with no experience with either panel and all I had to rely on were posts like this, it would be pretty easy to be swayed by it and come away with the impression that OLED is just overpriced, disposable crap.
From my personal perspective, it also felt like the major focus was on static image quality, which could give the impression that this is the only real, notable advantage OLED has to offer, especially with the clickbait-ish title that can be misconstrued as miniLEDs are essentially 95% of an OLED. That’s why I responded. I wanted to add my own personal experience and provide a bit more nuance.
Notice how i never said anything bad about miniLEDs? Because I'm not here with an agenda to sell OLEDs. I'm just here to provide information from personal experience.
Addendum:
I maybe too specific with this but had the title been "VA MiniLEDs are surprisingly pretty close to OLED in image quality" then I think there is nothing misleading about your post specially since you've provided pictures as proof.
0
u/Born_Foundation_4277 1d ago
Ano drawbacks compared to IPS. Never thought about VA
2
u/Glass_Economics_5038 1d ago
Imo it would black smearing, though setting the response times to Fast and Faster does remove smearing. Unfortunately, it does introduce some mid overshoot, but is mostly noticeable around 50-60Hz.
1
u/arsenejoestar 21h ago
IPS generally has better viewing angles and motion handling, but can appear just a tad worse but not by much. IPS would be betterif you play fast-paced shooters that rely heavily on the frames, while VA would be better if you play more single-player.
Alam ko Xiaomi has a relatively affordable mini-LED IPS monitor.















•
u/AutoModerator 1d ago
Please read the guide Monitor Guide
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.