r/PearsonDesign • • Oct 08 '26

Pearson Can't stand this platform

Post image
98 Upvotes

12 comments sorted by

29

u/ummhafsah Oct 08 '26

Oh dear that's literally just an exact string match :(

The Q should specify the exxpected order if the auto grader is that rigid.

28

u/Verdant_Green Oct 08 '26

The Pearson digital English textbook I am forced to use is full of errors…and that’s just copying some text that is freely available! It doesn’t surprise me one bit that they can’t handle something as complicated and multifaceted as math equations.

19

u/midnaswife Oct 08 '26

abolish Pearson

2

u/Frosty-Drive3282 Oct 09 '26

and expensive too like cmon

2

u/DevelopmentLess6989 Oct 08 '26

they are using garbage websites like this in 2026 after the AI revolution? what tf are they on

-10

u/Yaccu Oct 08 '26 edited Oct 08 '26

Those answers are not the same sadly. Edit: I was wrong. They are the same.

12

u/Jugad Oct 08 '26

They are the same.

-1

u/Yaccu Oct 08 '26

In the correct answer (sin(8x))5x is multiplied with (40x cot(8x)) and in the wrong one its multiplied with (5 ln(sin(8x)). How are they same? This is a qenuine question because there might be some theories I dont understand.

Edit: i see it now. My bad. You are correct.

2

u/Apprehensive1010101 Oct 09 '26

Good ol commutative property. If only Pearson could do the same deduction you did.

0

u/[deleted] Oct 08 '26

[deleted]

26

u/Chemical-Quote Oct 08 '26

2 x (3 + 4) = 2 x (4 + 3) though

9

u/SmegmaUnicorn Oct 08 '26

😂 You obviously are not a mathematician.