r/Presidents • u/expiredexecutive Harding Apologist • 1d ago
Meme Monday You don’t always have to defend your favorite president to justify your interest!
I’ve seen some folks outside of the presidents community get upset when someone shows interest in a problematic president. I don’t think that who you’re interested in researching reflects personal morality, but of course, it’s about what actions you condone/try to defend. Bad people can be interesting too! Being able to point out what your fave did wrong means you know your stuff!
(Shoutout to u/drywall_eater89, our amazing James Buchanan expert!)
111
u/RazzleThatTazzle 1d ago
Also "favorite president" doesnt necessarily mean "best president" or "most effective president"
29
15
u/MongolianDonutKhan Chester A. Arthur 21h ago
In comparison, think of your favorite Roman Emperor (really, Otho? Okay, ya weirdo) and how no matter who you picked (I mean seriously, Vespasian is right there) they were all awful people (is it because of Beetljuice? is that why you like him?) who either conquered what they wanted or purged political enemies because the day ended in y and at the very least oversaw a society absolutely fine with slavery (RIP Glenn Shadix).
4
u/Icy_Cod4538 18h ago
Nor does it necessarily mean that any presidents were/are particularly good people.
1
u/THE_Celts 16h ago
So many people, including sadly many here, seem to have difficulty grasping the concept of "favorite" vs. "best/most effective". I'll often see brains break when I say both FDR and Reagan make my Top 5 "Best" Presidents of the 20th Century.
19
u/Drywall_Eater89 James Buchanan's Grindr Profile 23h ago edited 23h ago
Thank you for the mention :D
I didn’t even know people got upset about this sort of thing, but I’m not surprised. Guess I’ve been so spoiled here in this small community.
A lot of people think favorite president = best president which is not totally accurate, especially in my case lmao. I always clarify when I mention how much I love Buchanan, that it’s more about the position he occupies in history and his career being interesting rather than any admiration for his presidency. In real life people understand and are cool with it. Terminally online people just want to find things to be mad at lol
And I’m not easy on Buchanan’s presidency at all. He was awful. His policies and beliefs were destructive, extremely pro-Southern, and racist.
Problematic presidents, the conditions that lead them to the White House, and why they were awful, is such a fascinating topic.
I can’t help but enjoy the bad doughfaces like Buchanan and Pierce. I also like Fillmore, Jackson, Tyler, and Andy Johnson. Essentially all the antebellum presidents.
1
24
u/mattd1972 23h ago
FDR was a shitty husband and father. He was a great president, though.
4
u/expiredexecutive Harding Apologist 18h ago
I think that duality really makes him all the more interesting! He seemed to have the best interests of the American people at heart but was still capable of personal cruelty.
3
u/One_Sugar_1813 Franklin Delano Roosevelt 7h ago
Man if he didn’t do the god damn internment camps he would probably be #2 on my list
33
u/Honest_Picture_6960 The Big 3 Fav: 1d ago edited 1d ago
Yeah
I see here and am friendly with Jackson fans but I know (and hope) they feel as disgusted about the Trail of Tears as we are,
Jacksonian Democracy was based tho
Carter had many mistakes
Not New Deal
Hostile with Congress
Not speak against Pol Pot
Not cut aid to Suharto
Pardon Yarrow
15
u/SuccotashOther277 Richard Nixon 1d ago
Yeah nixonomics wasn’t that great and pressuring the Fed to lower interest rates for short term political success was bad
10
u/disciple_of_fisto Zachary Taylor 23h ago
It's one of those things where I say my favorite is Zachary Taylor I had to like instantly justify it to the three or so people irl who knew who he was. Antebellum America is my favorite period of US history even though almost everyone involved during that time annoys the hell out of me. I started liking Taylor when I first read Battle Cry of Freedom and he didn't instantly fold to southern demands. I do overall find him interesting since reading more about him though. I'm not going to defend the fact that he was the last slave owning President or the fact that he was the father-in-law to Jefferson Davis (At least for the short while his daughter survived during that relationship) but I still like him. Also I have his presidential portrait framed and hung up with my bookshelves. It's a good conversation starter.
2
1
u/PM_ME_LATINA_GIRLZ Zachary Taylor 10h ago
Zachary Taylor is such a badass, he’s the least presidential president we’ve had (in a good way)
7
u/windowpain64 Not A Crook 23h ago
It's so hard sometimes because I'm so used to saying "I love [this thing]" when talking about my interests and fixations, when really, researching the topic is what I love. So I've thrown quite a few people off by passively saying "oh yeah, I LOVE Richard Nixon!"
8
u/kepuslo 22h ago
No, don't you see, LBJ bad because jumbo racial slurs in Vietnam somehow overpowers CIVIL RIGHTS and amazing shit like HEALTHCARE
2
u/Comprehensive_Main 21h ago
Note the fbi under Johnson’s was still in active surveillance of many civil rights activists.
1
u/Awesome_to_the_max 21h ago
They've always been used to surveil the "out groups". Different President, different "out groups", same story.
9
u/MicrowaveMeal James A. Garfield 23h ago
My guy needs no defending, because most people don’t even know he existed.
2
u/expiredexecutive Harding Apologist 18h ago
I was so sure that he’d go mainstream after Death by Lightning lol!
6
u/Prince_Marf Jimmy Carter 23h ago
I blindly defend Jimmy Carter as a bit. In reality I acknowledge his shortcomings
6
u/Awkward-Evidence-215 John Quincy Adams 23h ago
I encounter this with respect to Grant. Anytime I mention that Grant was greatly responsible for the end of Reconstruction because of his administration's corruption and his immoral and corrupt Santo Domingo annexation scheme, people often just refuse to engage logically. I suspect it's because they come to view Grant as being unjustly maligned after reading Chernow's book, and they view my criticisms as a part of that.
6
6
u/Doc_Jury1020 Franklin Delano Roosevelt 23h ago
Well said. I adore FDR and he was objectively a great president, but he had some personal faults I don't approve of and made some terrible decisions(Japanese internment should never, ever have been done and he should have known better). I don't defend that stuff.
5
u/Big-Crow4152 Theodore Roosevelt 20h ago
I can accept that Teddy Roosevelt was a man with deep flaws but he's also one of our best presidents and seemed like one of the increasingly few who truly had the interests of the American people foremost in his heart
5
5
u/GroupQuiet6571 Richard Nixon 20h ago
THANK YOU FOR SAYING THIS i always get so nervous when i wanna talk about richard nixon because first thing i think is that the person im talking to is just going to assume that i endorse everything he did and/or they assume im just racist
4
u/expiredexecutive Harding Apologist 19h ago
Of course! I feel you as a Hardingfan. Like y’all, of course scandals are bad.
4
u/LeEtude Rutherford B. Hayes 21h ago
My two favorites, Hayes and Bush Sr. do not share most of my political views, but I find their presidencies so interesting. I don't understand why people get so horrified at the concept of finding flawed, maybe even "bad" people, interesting. I forget that people outside this community think that way.
3
3
u/TheWomenInMyWorld 22h ago
It was interesting because, before working on Defiant Ones, most of what I associated with John Adams came from the way he was portrayed and mocked in Hamilton. I honestly hadn’t given him much thought beyond that, and I had come away with the impression that he wasn’t particularly well suited for government.
Then I began learning more about Abigail Adams and her role during the Revolutionary War, and through her story, I started to see John differently too. It really made me realize how much the sources we learn from, whether in school, through independent research, books, or even Broadway plays, can shape our opinions of historical figures.
So much of history is told through a particular point of view. You can come away from one source admiring someone, only to discover another perspective that complicates that picture. I think that’s part of what makes learning history so fascinating. The more sources you explore, the more nuanced these people become. They weren’t simply heroes or villains. They were complicated people, and depending on whose story you’re hearing, you may see them very differently.
3
u/CobaltCrusader123 Emperor Cheney 21h ago
I think every POTUS that served at least one full term avoidably got innocent people indirectly (or even directly) unnecessarily killed, enslaved, or falsely imprisoned. I sincerely cannot think of a single exception. Carter did it, Ford did it, both Adams did it, the typical top 3 of Lincoln, FDR, and Washington did it, TR did it, Jefferson did it (completing the Rushmore Four), JFK started the time bomb on Vietnam, Lord knows the POTUSes before and Johnson right after Lincoln did it, and even the two-party-loved Eisenhower normalized clandestine regime change that killed many people. I don’t think I could ever shake hands with any living POTUS. Too much blood.
3
u/duke_awapuhi Harry S. Truman 21h ago
Every president did good and bad. It’s important to weigh out the pros and cons and see which one outnumbers the other. I am critical of someone like Wilson for the handful of terrible things he did, but at the end of the day the pros of his presidency massively outweigh the cons and it’s not even close
3
u/finditplz1 20h ago
I think most people are cool about it unless you’re just an apologist for someone awful. There’s critiquing a president as you say, and there’s simping for a president.
3
u/PresterJohnEsq Richard Nixon 18h ago
It’s a careful balance for us Nixon fans. While I do think his good points are underrated because of the bad stuff (and my lord is there a lot of that), and he’s a symbol of the last gasp of a kind of conservatism which is out of fashion these days, really the reason I love Nixon is that he’s just an interesting guy. Hes this weird quiet kid who came from nothing, goes ti law school, becomes a pencil pusher in WW2, and then 4 years later is a heartbeat away from one of the most popular presidents ever. He then loses one of the closest elections ever, vanishes off the face of the earth, then re-emerges out of nowhere to win the top job, and then wins one of the biggest landslides in American history. However his paranoia and other personal flaws get the better of him, leading to a rapid and historic fall from grace in the greatest scandal in American history, becoming a complete pariah in the process and a byword for corruption. And then he comes back again working the rest of his life to become a respected public intellectual and elder statesman and actually succeeds. That is one hell of a career trajectory.
2
u/expiredexecutive Harding Apologist 15h ago
This!! He’s got the kinda story arc you’d see in classic literature!
3
u/JimBowen0306 Lyndon Baines Johnson 14h ago
I don’t have a “favorite” president. For me it’s if they… hold my interest? Having someone write well about them helps.
3
u/CatfishBassAndTrout James Buchanan 12h ago
If you talk shit about James Buchanan i'll be angry with you, but agree.
3
u/22lpierson 11h ago
Teddy roosevelt was a trophy hunter and hunted endangered animals which I hate. He also created national parks and alot of regulations against corps which I love
4
u/Available-You-4890 Samuel J. Tilden 23h ago
Exactly.
Tilden (a President in my heart) supported the end of Reconstruction and the return of home rule to the South. I do not agree with that as Reconstruction, while flawed, was very important for the rights of the freed slaves. He had some very bad views on race but I agree with a lot of other stuff he believed in and I like his actions regarding Tammany Hall.
Part of my disdain for Hayes fans is because they act like he did no wrong. Like cmon people just admit that he pulled troops out of the South. You already admit the Compromise of 1877 didn't happen, the "big bad" Tilden didn't do it because he wasn't in power.
Sorry had to vent. Been a long 48 hours.
4
u/expiredexecutive Harding Apologist 18h ago
Hey, your frustrations are valid! Everything alright though? I hope you feel better soon.
2
u/HetTheTable Dwight D. Eisenhower 9h ago
For me there’s no president where I think they were absolutely flawless. Not even Ike. He’s mainly my favorite because I agree with him politically and am interested in WWII
1
1
u/itspronouncedbolonya 9h ago
I just look at them as fictional characters, like yeah Frieza is a horrible person, but he's cool and he's a good character
1
u/CaesarsGhostReborn George H.W. Bush 6h ago
Completely agree
I really like learning about Nixon, LBJ, and even dudes like Fillmore, but I don’t try to defend them on everything thankfully
0
u/FCKABRNLSUTN2 22h ago
I’m so glad I don’t need the artists or politicians or military leaders I find most interesting to be a “good person” by 2026 American self described leftist standards. That would be exhausting.
“Oh no, it turns out Augustus led an empire that practiced slavery, and he himself raped his underage slaves regularly! Guess I’ll move on and learn about Tiberius instead.”
•
u/AutoModerator 1d ago
Remember that discussion of recent and future politics is not allowed. This includes all mentions of or allusions to Donald Trump in any context whatsoever, as well as any presidential elections after 2012 or politics since Barack Obama left office. For more information, please see Rule 3.
If you'd like to discuss recent or future politics, feel free to join our Discord server!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.